A multi-center, randomized, open label, two-arm study to evaluate safety & efficacy of nutraceutical tablet as adjuvant when compared with standard of care in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia

IF 1.7 Q3 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE
Suresh B. Patankar , Anupama Patankar , Sagar Patankar , Rajesh Raje , Chandu Devanpally , Pranjal Ausekar , GauravPatil , Shraddha Chitale
{"title":"A multi-center, randomized, open label, two-arm study to evaluate safety & efficacy of nutraceutical tablet as adjuvant when compared with standard of care in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia","authors":"Suresh B. Patankar ,&nbsp;Anupama Patankar ,&nbsp;Sagar Patankar ,&nbsp;Rajesh Raje ,&nbsp;Chandu Devanpally ,&nbsp;Pranjal Ausekar ,&nbsp;GauravPatil ,&nbsp;Shraddha Chitale","doi":"10.1016/j.jaim.2024.100971","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Benign Prostrate Hyperplasia (BPH) is a progressive disease of ageing men that may be associated with enlargement of the prostate and lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). Herbal/Nutraceutical formulations in addition to standard of care (SOC) could alleviate the symptoms, and thus improve the quality of life of patients.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To evaluate safety &amp; efficacy of nutraceutical tablet as an adjuvant with SOC.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><div>This was a prospective, randomized two-arm study aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of Herbal/Nutraceutical Formulation (IP) + SOC versus only SOC, in BPH patients. The primary efficacy endpoint was the change in international prostate symptom score (IPSS) within and between two arms. The safety was evaluated in terms of adverse events and change in prostate specific antigen (PSA) levels.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>140 eligible patients (70 / arm) were evaluated for efficacy and safety endpoints. The baseline characteristics of patients in two arms differed nonsignificantly. The change in IPSS-storage, voiding and QoL scores, from day 1 to 90 were statistically significant in both the arms (p &lt; 0.0001). However, by day 90, the change in these scores in SOC+IP arm were significantly higher than that of SOC arm. Further, the change in International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) scores was significant in SOC+IP arm (p &lt; 0.05), while non-significant in SOC arm. The adverse events non-significantly differed between two arms.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The herbal/nutraceutical formulation combined with SOC are safe and effective for the treatment of BPH. The combination therapy was effective in reducing urine-related symptoms and improving the QoL of BPH patients.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15150,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ayurveda and Integrative Medicine","volume":"15 5","pages":"Article 100971"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ayurveda and Integrative Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S097594762400086X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Benign Prostrate Hyperplasia (BPH) is a progressive disease of ageing men that may be associated with enlargement of the prostate and lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). Herbal/Nutraceutical formulations in addition to standard of care (SOC) could alleviate the symptoms, and thus improve the quality of life of patients.

Objectives

To evaluate safety & efficacy of nutraceutical tablet as an adjuvant with SOC.

Materials and Methods

This was a prospective, randomized two-arm study aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of Herbal/Nutraceutical Formulation (IP) + SOC versus only SOC, in BPH patients. The primary efficacy endpoint was the change in international prostate symptom score (IPSS) within and between two arms. The safety was evaluated in terms of adverse events and change in prostate specific antigen (PSA) levels.

Results

140 eligible patients (70 / arm) were evaluated for efficacy and safety endpoints. The baseline characteristics of patients in two arms differed nonsignificantly. The change in IPSS-storage, voiding and QoL scores, from day 1 to 90 were statistically significant in both the arms (p < 0.0001). However, by day 90, the change in these scores in SOC+IP arm were significantly higher than that of SOC arm. Further, the change in International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) scores was significant in SOC+IP arm (p < 0.05), while non-significant in SOC arm. The adverse events non-significantly differed between two arms.

Conclusion

The herbal/nutraceutical formulation combined with SOC are safe and effective for the treatment of BPH. The combination therapy was effective in reducing urine-related symptoms and improving the QoL of BPH patients.
这是一项多中心、随机、开放标签、双臂研究,旨在评估良性前列腺增生患者将营养保健品片剂作为辅助治疗与标准治疗相比的安全性和有效性。
背景:良性前列腺增生症(BPH)是一种渐进性老年男性疾病,可能与前列腺增生和下尿路症状(LUTS)有关。除标准治疗(SOC)外,草药/保健品配方可减轻症状,从而改善患者的生活质量:材料与方法:这是一项前瞻性随机对照研究:这是一项前瞻性随机双臂研究,旨在评估前列腺增生症患者服用草药/保健品制剂(IP)+SOC 与仅服用 SOC 的安全性和有效性。主要疗效终点是两组患者体内和两组之间国际前列腺症状评分(IPSS)的变化。安全性则根据不良事件和前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)水平的变化进行评估:对 140 名符合条件的患者(70 人/组)进行了疗效和安全性终点评估。两组患者的基线特征差异不大。从第 1 天到第 90 天,两组患者的 IPSS-储尿、排尿和 QoL 评分的变化均有统计学意义(P < 0.0001)。然而,到第 90 天,SOC+IP 治疗组的这些评分变化明显高于 SOC 治疗组。此外,国际勃起功能指数(IIEF)评分的变化在 SOC+IP 组显著(p < 0.05),而在 SOC 组不显著。两组的不良反应差异不显著:结论:草药/保健品配方与SOC联合治疗良性前列腺增生症安全有效。联合疗法能有效减轻良性前列腺增生患者的尿相关症状,改善其生活质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Ayurveda and Integrative Medicine
Journal of Ayurveda and Integrative Medicine INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
12.50%
发文量
136
审稿时长
30 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信