Brooding, reflection, and anger rumination in late life suicidal behavior.

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Journal of affective disorders Pub Date : 2025-01-15 Epub Date: 2024-10-22 DOI:10.1016/j.jad.2024.10.093
Morgan Buerke, Alexandra Khani, Hanga Galfalvy, Meghan T Wong, Katalin Szanto
{"title":"Brooding, reflection, and anger rumination in late life suicidal behavior.","authors":"Morgan Buerke, Alexandra Khani, Hanga Galfalvy, Meghan T Wong, Katalin Szanto","doi":"10.1016/j.jad.2024.10.093","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Current literature on age-specific risk factors for suicide in older adulthood is lacking. One risk factor for younger-life suicide, rumination, has not been extensively studied in older adults, but from prior research, may be more relevant to late-life vs. early life suicide. The current study investigated how multiple subtypes of rumination (i.e., brooding, reflection, and anger rumination) relate to suicidal ideation and recent suicidal behavior in late life.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>378 participants aged 50-90 (mean age 63.4, SD 7.5) were recruited into a case-control study examining suicide in older adults. Participants were recruited into three groups: 1) depressed adults who had made a recent (past two years) suicide attempt, 2) those with depression but no suicide attempt, and 3) a healthy comparison group. Among depressed groups, we examined relationships between rumination types, trait anger, depression, and suicidal ideation. Then, we conducted logistic regression to test which variables were related to having made a suicide attempt in the past two years among those with current suicidal ideation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All forms of rumination were related to depression. Brooding was related to ideation severity, but only depression severity related to presence of ideation. Anger rumination and ideation severity each contributed unique variance in their prediction of recent suicide attempts.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>Our cross-section design does not allow for causal claims; future studies should consider using ecological momentary assessment approaches.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Treatments to decrease rumination without an intense cognitive component should be considered for late-life patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":14963,"journal":{"name":"Journal of affective disorders","volume":" ","pages":"963-969"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of affective disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2024.10.093","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Current literature on age-specific risk factors for suicide in older adulthood is lacking. One risk factor for younger-life suicide, rumination, has not been extensively studied in older adults, but from prior research, may be more relevant to late-life vs. early life suicide. The current study investigated how multiple subtypes of rumination (i.e., brooding, reflection, and anger rumination) relate to suicidal ideation and recent suicidal behavior in late life.

Methods: 378 participants aged 50-90 (mean age 63.4, SD 7.5) were recruited into a case-control study examining suicide in older adults. Participants were recruited into three groups: 1) depressed adults who had made a recent (past two years) suicide attempt, 2) those with depression but no suicide attempt, and 3) a healthy comparison group. Among depressed groups, we examined relationships between rumination types, trait anger, depression, and suicidal ideation. Then, we conducted logistic regression to test which variables were related to having made a suicide attempt in the past two years among those with current suicidal ideation.

Results: All forms of rumination were related to depression. Brooding was related to ideation severity, but only depression severity related to presence of ideation. Anger rumination and ideation severity each contributed unique variance in their prediction of recent suicide attempts.

Limitations: Our cross-section design does not allow for causal claims; future studies should consider using ecological momentary assessment approaches.

Conclusions: Treatments to decrease rumination without an intense cognitive component should be considered for late-life patients.

晚年自杀行为中的忧郁、反思和愤怒反刍。
背景:目前还缺乏有关老年人自杀风险因素年龄特异性的文献。年轻时自杀的一个风险因素--反刍,尚未在老年人中得到广泛研究,但从先前的研究来看,可能与晚年自杀和早年自杀更为相关。本研究调查了反刍的多种亚型(即沉思、反省和愤怒反刍)与晚年自杀意念和近期自杀行为之间的关系。受试者被分为三组:1)近期(过去两年)有自杀企图的抑郁症成人;2)有抑郁症但无自杀企图的人;3)健康对比组。在抑郁组中,我们研究了反刍类型、特质愤怒、抑郁和自杀意念之间的关系。然后,我们进行了逻辑回归,以检验哪些变量与目前有自杀意念的人在过去两年中试图自杀有关:所有形式的反刍都与抑郁有关。沉思与意念的严重程度有关,但只有抑郁的严重程度与意念的存在有关。愤怒反刍和意念严重程度在预测近期自杀未遂方面各有独特的差异:局限性:我们的横截面设计无法得出因果关系;未来的研究应考虑使用生态学瞬间评估方法:结论:对于晚期患者,应考虑采用治疗方法来减少反刍,但不包括强烈的认知成分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of affective disorders
Journal of affective disorders 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
6.10%
发文量
1319
审稿时长
9.3 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Affective Disorders publishes papers concerned with affective disorders in the widest sense: depression, mania, mood spectrum, emotions and personality, anxiety and stress. It is interdisciplinary and aims to bring together different approaches for a diverse readership. Top quality papers will be accepted dealing with any aspect of affective disorders, including neuroimaging, cognitive neurosciences, genetics, molecular biology, experimental and clinical neurosciences, pharmacology, neuroimmunoendocrinology, intervention and treatment trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信