Temporal Trends in Thyroid Nodule Size on Ultrasonography: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 6 1区 医学 Q1 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Hayley Mann, Natalia Arroyo, Vivian Hsiao, Franklin Tessler, Lori Mankowski Gettle, Yanchen Zhang, Abdullah Adil, Mary Hitchcock, Elian Massoud, Catherine Jensen, Oguzhan Alagoz, Louise Davies, Sara Fernandes-Taylor, David O Francis
{"title":"Temporal Trends in Thyroid Nodule Size on Ultrasonography: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Hayley Mann, Natalia Arroyo, Vivian Hsiao, Franklin Tessler, Lori Mankowski Gettle, Yanchen Zhang, Abdullah Adil, Mary Hitchcock, Elian Massoud, Catherine Jensen, Oguzhan Alagoz, Louise Davies, Sara Fernandes-Taylor, David O Francis","doi":"10.1001/jamaoto.2024.3623","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>In recent years, concern has grown around the overdetection of thyroid cancer. Changes to thyroid nodule risk stratification systems and guidelines were made to improve diagnostic yield. It is not known how these advancements have affected the size of thyroid nodules reported on ultrasonography over time.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate change in reported nodule size since 1990, particularly between studies of thyroid ultrasonography obtained for diagnostic vs screening purposes.</p><p><strong>Study selection: </strong>The systematic review included original research studies that reported thyroid nodule size in adults undergoing their first thyroid ultrasonography. Excluded studies were those that included patients with known thyroid disease, prior thyroid ultrasonography, nodules identified through other imaging modalities, and/or that had constraints on nodule size and/or characteristics.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>PubMed, SCOPUS, CENTRAL, and CINAHL were reviewed from January 1990 to March 2021. Study characteristics, patient demographic characteristics, nodule size, and ultrasonography techniques were independently extracted by multiple observers.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The size of thyroid nodules reported via ultrasonography over time. Mixed-effects meta-regression models were used to evaluate mean nodule size (1) overall, (2) in studies that used ultrasonography diagnostically, and (3) in studies that used ultrasonography for screening.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 11 963 patients were included; the mean (SD) age was 47.6 (5.2) years. A total of 1097 studies were identified; of these, 395 full-text articles were assessed, and 18 studies met inclusion criteria. All were done at academic institutions. Altogether, these studies had 11 963 patients who underwent a first thyroid ultrasonography. Reported mean nodule size increased 0.52 mm each year from 1990 to 2021 (95% CI, 0.2-0.81). Diagnostic subgroup mean nodule size increased 0.57 mm each year from 1990 to 2021 (95% CI, 0.21-0.93). Screening subgroup mean nodule size decreased by 0.23 mm each year up to 2012 (95% CI, -0.40 to -0.07).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results of this systematic review and meta-analysis suggest that thyroid nodule size reported on diagnostic ultrasonography has increased over time in conjunction with changes in risk stratification systems, nodule guidelines, and radiology practice patterns. Conversely, a decrease in size reported in asymptomatic, ultrasonography-screened populations was observed. Findings from screening studies show that subcentimeter nodules are prevalent and easily identified with ultrasonography, but clinical relevance is questionable. Altogether, these results may provide insight into how ultrasonography guidelines and practice patterns have changed thyroid nodule reporting over time and can inform future guidelines and policies associated with thyroid nodule management.</p>","PeriodicalId":14632,"journal":{"name":"JAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoto.2024.3623","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: In recent years, concern has grown around the overdetection of thyroid cancer. Changes to thyroid nodule risk stratification systems and guidelines were made to improve diagnostic yield. It is not known how these advancements have affected the size of thyroid nodules reported on ultrasonography over time.

Objective: To evaluate change in reported nodule size since 1990, particularly between studies of thyroid ultrasonography obtained for diagnostic vs screening purposes.

Study selection: The systematic review included original research studies that reported thyroid nodule size in adults undergoing their first thyroid ultrasonography. Excluded studies were those that included patients with known thyroid disease, prior thyroid ultrasonography, nodules identified through other imaging modalities, and/or that had constraints on nodule size and/or characteristics.

Data sources: PubMed, SCOPUS, CENTRAL, and CINAHL were reviewed from January 1990 to March 2021. Study characteristics, patient demographic characteristics, nodule size, and ultrasonography techniques were independently extracted by multiple observers.

Main outcomes and measures: The size of thyroid nodules reported via ultrasonography over time. Mixed-effects meta-regression models were used to evaluate mean nodule size (1) overall, (2) in studies that used ultrasonography diagnostically, and (3) in studies that used ultrasonography for screening.

Results: A total of 11 963 patients were included; the mean (SD) age was 47.6 (5.2) years. A total of 1097 studies were identified; of these, 395 full-text articles were assessed, and 18 studies met inclusion criteria. All were done at academic institutions. Altogether, these studies had 11 963 patients who underwent a first thyroid ultrasonography. Reported mean nodule size increased 0.52 mm each year from 1990 to 2021 (95% CI, 0.2-0.81). Diagnostic subgroup mean nodule size increased 0.57 mm each year from 1990 to 2021 (95% CI, 0.21-0.93). Screening subgroup mean nodule size decreased by 0.23 mm each year up to 2012 (95% CI, -0.40 to -0.07).

Conclusions: The results of this systematic review and meta-analysis suggest that thyroid nodule size reported on diagnostic ultrasonography has increased over time in conjunction with changes in risk stratification systems, nodule guidelines, and radiology practice patterns. Conversely, a decrease in size reported in asymptomatic, ultrasonography-screened populations was observed. Findings from screening studies show that subcentimeter nodules are prevalent and easily identified with ultrasonography, but clinical relevance is questionable. Altogether, these results may provide insight into how ultrasonography guidelines and practice patterns have changed thyroid nodule reporting over time and can inform future guidelines and policies associated with thyroid nodule management.

超声波检查甲状腺结节大小的时间趋势:系统回顾与元分析》。
重要性:近年来,人们越来越关注甲状腺癌的过度检测。为了提高诊断率,对甲状腺结节风险分层系统和指南进行了修改。目前尚不清楚随着时间的推移,这些进步对超声波检查报告的甲状腺结节大小有何影响:目的:评估自 1990 年以来报告的结节大小的变化,尤其是以诊断和筛查为目的的甲状腺超声造影研究之间的变化:系统综述包括报告首次接受甲状腺超声波检查的成人甲状腺结节大小的原始研究。查阅了1990年1月至2021年3月期间的PubMed、SCOPUS、CENTRAL和CINAHL。研究特征、患者人口统计学特征、结节大小和超声造影技术由多名观察者独立提取:主要结果和测量指标:随着时间的推移,通过超声波检查报告的甲状腺结节的大小。混合效应元回归模型用于评估(1)总体、(2)使用超声造影诊断的研究和(3)使用超声造影筛查的研究中的平均结节大小:共纳入 11 963 名患者;平均(标清)年龄为 47.6 (5.2) 岁。共确定了 1097 项研究;对其中 395 篇全文进行了评估,18 项研究符合纳入标准。所有研究均由学术机构完成。这些研究共有11 963名患者接受了首次甲状腺超声检查。从1990年到2021年,报告的平均结节大小每年增加0.52毫米(95% CI,0.2-0.81)。诊断亚组的平均结节大小从 1990 年到 2021 年每年增加 0.57 毫米(95% CI,0.21-0.93)。筛查亚组的平均结节大小在2012年之前每年减少0.23毫米(95% CI,-0.40至-0.07):本系统综述和荟萃分析的结果表明,随着风险分层系统、结节指南和放射学实践模式的变化,超声诊断报告的甲状腺结节大小也随之增加。相反,在无症状的超声筛查人群中,报告的结节大小却有所减小。筛查研究结果表明,亚厘米结节很普遍,而且很容易通过超声波检查发现,但其临床相关性值得怀疑。总之,这些结果可以让人们深入了解随着时间的推移,超声造影指南和实践模式是如何改变甲状腺结节报告的,并为未来甲状腺结节管理的相关指南和政策提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
5.10%
发文量
230
期刊介绍: JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery is a globally recognized and peer-reviewed medical journal dedicated to providing up-to-date information on diseases affecting the head and neck. It originated in 1925 as Archives of Otolaryngology and currently serves as the official publication for the American Head and Neck Society. As part of the prestigious JAMA Network, a collection of reputable general medical and specialty publications, it ensures the highest standards of research and expertise. Physicians and scientists worldwide rely on JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery for invaluable insights in this specialized field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信