Comparison of laparoscopic-assisted flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy with percutaneous nephrolithotripsy and flexible ureteroscopy lithotripsy: a case-control study and meta-analysis.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
International Urology and Nephrology Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-23 DOI:10.1007/s11255-024-04250-y
Jia Wei He, Yan Feng Su
{"title":"Comparison of laparoscopic-assisted flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy with percutaneous nephrolithotripsy and flexible ureteroscopy lithotripsy: a case-control study and meta-analysis.","authors":"Jia Wei He, Yan Feng Su","doi":"10.1007/s11255-024-04250-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aims to compare the differences in stone clearance rate, infection rate, and bleeding risk among laparoscopic-assisted flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy (LAFUL), percutaneous nephrolithotripsy (PCNL), and flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy (FUL) through case-control studies and meta-analysis, to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of LAFUL.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>1. Through systematic literature search, clinical studies related to LAFUL, PCNL, and FUL were screened, and data on stone clearance rate, infection rate, and bleeding events were collected and analyzed for three groups of patients, followed by meta-analysis. 2. Data of patients who met the single center inclusion criteria and received LAFUL (40 cases), PCNL (40 cases, FUL), and FUL (40 cases) treatments for kidney stones from January 2021 to December 2023 were collected. Using a case-control study method, relevant clinical data were analyzed using SPSS 26.0 software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 31 studies involving 2974 patients were included. The results of case-control analysis showed the stone clearance rate in the LAFUL group (F = 225.19, P < 0.001) and the positive rate of postoperative urine bacterial culture (X<sup>2</sup> = 4.558, P = 0.033). The results of meta-analysis showed the stone clearance rate (rate = 0.986, 95% CI 0.964-0.999) and blood transfusion rate (rate = 0, 95% CI 0-0.012) in the LAFUL group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>LAFUL shows potential in improving the stone clearance rate and reducing the risk of postoperative infection and bleeding, suggesting it may have certain advantages in the treatment of renal calculi.</p>","PeriodicalId":14454,"journal":{"name":"International Urology and Nephrology","volume":" ","pages":"741-751"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Urology and Nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-024-04250-y","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study aims to compare the differences in stone clearance rate, infection rate, and bleeding risk among laparoscopic-assisted flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy (LAFUL), percutaneous nephrolithotripsy (PCNL), and flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy (FUL) through case-control studies and meta-analysis, to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of LAFUL.

Methods: 1. Through systematic literature search, clinical studies related to LAFUL, PCNL, and FUL were screened, and data on stone clearance rate, infection rate, and bleeding events were collected and analyzed for three groups of patients, followed by meta-analysis. 2. Data of patients who met the single center inclusion criteria and received LAFUL (40 cases), PCNL (40 cases, FUL), and FUL (40 cases) treatments for kidney stones from January 2021 to December 2023 were collected. Using a case-control study method, relevant clinical data were analyzed using SPSS 26.0 software.

Results: A total of 31 studies involving 2974 patients were included. The results of case-control analysis showed the stone clearance rate in the LAFUL group (F = 225.19, P < 0.001) and the positive rate of postoperative urine bacterial culture (X2 = 4.558, P = 0.033). The results of meta-analysis showed the stone clearance rate (rate = 0.986, 95% CI 0.964-0.999) and blood transfusion rate (rate = 0, 95% CI 0-0.012) in the LAFUL group.

Conclusion: LAFUL shows potential in improving the stone clearance rate and reducing the risk of postoperative infection and bleeding, suggesting it may have certain advantages in the treatment of renal calculi.

腹腔镜辅助柔性输尿管镜碎石术与经皮肾镜碎石术和柔性输尿管镜碎石术的比较:病例对照研究和荟萃分析。
研究背景本研究旨在通过病例对照研究和荟萃分析,比较腹腔镜辅助柔性输尿管镜碎石术(LAFUL)、经皮肾镜碎石术(PCNL)和柔性输尿管镜碎石术(FUL)在结石清除率、感染率和出血风险方面的差异,以评价LAFUL的安全性和有效性。方法:1.通过系统文献检索,筛选与LAFUL、PCNL和FUL相关的临床研究,收集并分析三组患者的结石清除率、感染率和出血事件等数据,然后进行荟萃分析。2.收集2021年1月至2023年12月期间符合单中心纳入标准并接受LAFUL(40例)、PCNL(40例、FUL)和FUL(40例)治疗的肾结石患者数据。采用病例对照研究方法,使用 SPSS 26.0 软件对相关临床数据进行分析:结果:共纳入 31 项研究,涉及 2974 名患者。病例对照分析结果显示,LAFUL 组结石清除率更高(F = 225.19,P 2 = 4.558,P = 0.033)。荟萃分析结果显示,LAFUL组结石清除率(率=0.986,95% CI 0.964-0.999)和输血率(率=0,95% CI 0-0.012):LAFUL在提高结石清除率、降低术后感染和出血风险方面具有潜力,这表明它在治疗肾结石方面可能具有一定的优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Urology and Nephrology
International Urology and Nephrology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.00%
发文量
329
审稿时长
1.7 months
期刊介绍: International Urology and Nephrology publishes original papers on a broad range of topics in urology, nephrology and andrology. The journal integrates papers originating from clinical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信