The Effects of Different Nursing Positions During Preterm Infants Feeding on Gastric Residual Volume and Emptying Rate: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Amal Mohamed Elhusein, Hammad Ali Fadlalmola
{"title":"The Effects of Different Nursing Positions During Preterm Infants Feeding on Gastric Residual Volume and Emptying Rate: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Amal Mohamed Elhusein, Hammad Ali Fadlalmola","doi":"10.1111/ijn.13309","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Preterm infants need nutritional support due to their premature digestive system, undeveloped anatomy and functional limitations. Neonatal positioning in the proper position is one of the nurses' main principles that affect the residual volume. We performed our systematic review and network meta-analysis to determine the best feeding position for preterm infants in reducing gastric residual volume and increasing the rate of gastric emptying.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We systematically searched PubMed, Cochrane, CINHAL, Scopus and Web of Science from their inception to August 2023. We included studies that assess the effect of different feeding positions for preterm infants on gastric residuals. The Cochrane risk of bias tool (ROB2) appraised the included clinical trials. Cohort studies were assessed by the NIH tool and quasi-experimental studies by the relevant items from (Downs and Black) checklist. RevMan Version 5.4 was used for analysing the pooled data. Our study included a frequentist network meta-analysis of the aggregate data to obtain network estimates for the outcomes of interest. Network meta-analysis was done using R software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 16 studies with 1139 premature infants, comparing six preterm feeding positions. The pooled MD and 95% CI for GRV at 30 min for right lateral, prone, right anterior oblique and left lateral compared to supine position were as follows: (-12.08 [-20.09, -4.07]), (-11.14 [-18.26, -4.01]), (-9.02 [-21.66, 3.61]) and (-0.18 [-7.87, 7.5]), respectively. Moreover, the pooled MD and 95% CI for GRV at 180 min for right lateral, prone and left lateral compared to supine position were as follows: (-0.69 [-1.29, -0.09]), (-0.56 [-1.22, 0.1]) and (0.09 [-0.63, 0.81]), respectively. Nevertheless, the pooled MD and 95% CI for GRV at 120 min for right anterior oblique, prone, right lateral and left lateral compared to supine position were as follows: (-6.09 [-11.33, -0.86]), (-5.07 [-7.71, -2.43]), (-3.08 [-5.89, -0.27]) and (-0.44 [-3.41, 2.53]), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We concluded that the best nursing position after preterm infants feeding for lower gastric residuals and higher gastric emptying rate is the right lateral position after 30 and 180 min post-feeding. Also, the right anterior oblique was the best after 120 min. Although the prone position can lower the GRV better than the left lateral and supine positions, it is not advisable to use this position because it raises the SIDS risk. Our results could help healthcare professionals to provide the appropriate positioning of preterm infants.</p>","PeriodicalId":14223,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Nursing Practice","volume":" ","pages":"e13309"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Nursing Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ijn.13309","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Preterm infants need nutritional support due to their premature digestive system, undeveloped anatomy and functional limitations. Neonatal positioning in the proper position is one of the nurses' main principles that affect the residual volume. We performed our systematic review and network meta-analysis to determine the best feeding position for preterm infants in reducing gastric residual volume and increasing the rate of gastric emptying.

Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Cochrane, CINHAL, Scopus and Web of Science from their inception to August 2023. We included studies that assess the effect of different feeding positions for preterm infants on gastric residuals. The Cochrane risk of bias tool (ROB2) appraised the included clinical trials. Cohort studies were assessed by the NIH tool and quasi-experimental studies by the relevant items from (Downs and Black) checklist. RevMan Version 5.4 was used for analysing the pooled data. Our study included a frequentist network meta-analysis of the aggregate data to obtain network estimates for the outcomes of interest. Network meta-analysis was done using R software.

Results: We included 16 studies with 1139 premature infants, comparing six preterm feeding positions. The pooled MD and 95% CI for GRV at 30 min for right lateral, prone, right anterior oblique and left lateral compared to supine position were as follows: (-12.08 [-20.09, -4.07]), (-11.14 [-18.26, -4.01]), (-9.02 [-21.66, 3.61]) and (-0.18 [-7.87, 7.5]), respectively. Moreover, the pooled MD and 95% CI for GRV at 180 min for right lateral, prone and left lateral compared to supine position were as follows: (-0.69 [-1.29, -0.09]), (-0.56 [-1.22, 0.1]) and (0.09 [-0.63, 0.81]), respectively. Nevertheless, the pooled MD and 95% CI for GRV at 120 min for right anterior oblique, prone, right lateral and left lateral compared to supine position were as follows: (-6.09 [-11.33, -0.86]), (-5.07 [-7.71, -2.43]), (-3.08 [-5.89, -0.27]) and (-0.44 [-3.41, 2.53]), respectively.

Conclusion: We concluded that the best nursing position after preterm infants feeding for lower gastric residuals and higher gastric emptying rate is the right lateral position after 30 and 180 min post-feeding. Also, the right anterior oblique was the best after 120 min. Although the prone position can lower the GRV better than the left lateral and supine positions, it is not advisable to use this position because it raises the SIDS risk. Our results could help healthcare professionals to provide the appropriate positioning of preterm infants.

早产儿喂养期间不同哺乳姿势对胃剩余容积和排空率的影响:系统回顾与网络元分析》。
背景和目的:早产儿由于消化系统发育不成熟、解剖结构不完善以及功能限制,需要营养支持。将新生儿安置在合适的位置是护士的主要原则之一,会影响残余量。我们进行了系统综述和网络荟萃分析,以确定早产儿的最佳喂养姿势,从而减少胃残余容积,提高胃排空率:我们系统地检索了 PubMed、Cochrane、CINHAL、Scopus 和 Web of Science 从开始到 2023 年 8 月的内容。我们纳入了评估早产儿不同喂养姿势对胃剩余物影响的研究。科克伦偏倚风险工具(ROB2)对纳入的临床试验进行了评估。队列研究采用 NIH 工具进行评估,准实验研究采用(Downs 和 Black)核对表中的相关项目进行评估。RevMan 5.4 版用于分析汇总数据。我们的研究包括对汇总数据进行频数网络荟萃分析,以获得相关结果的网络估计值。网络荟萃分析使用 R 软件完成:我们纳入了 16 项研究,对 1139 名早产儿的六种早产儿喂养姿势进行了比较。与仰卧位相比,右侧卧位、俯卧位、右前斜卧位和左侧卧位在 30 分钟内的 GRV 的汇总 MD 和 95% CI 如下:(分别为(-12.08 [-20.09, -4.07])、(-11.14 [-18.26, -4.01])、(-9.02 [-21.66, 3.61])和(-0.18 [-7.87, 7.5])。此外,与仰卧位相比,右侧卧位、俯卧位和左侧卧位在 180 分钟时的 GRV 的汇总 MD 和 95% CI 如下:(分别为(-0.69 [-1.29, -0.09])、(-0.56 [-1.22, 0.1])和(0.09 [-0.63, 0.81])。然而,与仰卧位相比,120 分钟时右前斜位、俯卧位、右外侧位和左外侧位 GRV 的汇总 MD 和 95% CI 如下(分别为(-6.09 [-11.33, -0.86])、(-5.07 [-7.71, -2.43])、(-3.08 [-5.89, -0.27])和(-0.44 [-3.41, 2.53]):我们得出的结论是,早产儿喂奶后 30 分钟和 180 分钟后的右侧卧位是降低胃残余物和提高胃排空率的最佳哺乳姿势。此外,右前斜位也是 120 分钟后的最佳姿势。虽然俯卧位比左侧卧位和仰卧位能更好地降低胃残留率,但由于俯卧位会增加婴儿猝死综合症的风险,因此不建议使用这种体位。我们的研究结果有助于医护人员为早产儿提供合适的体位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
85
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: International Journal of Nursing Practice is a fully refereed journal that publishes original scholarly work that advances the international understanding and development of nursing, both as a profession and as an academic discipline. The Journal focuses on research papers and professional discussion papers that have a sound scientific, theoretical or philosophical base. Preference is given to high-quality papers written in a way that renders them accessible to a wide audience without compromising quality. The primary criteria for acceptance are excellence, relevance and clarity. All articles are peer-reviewed by at least two researchers expert in the field of the submitted paper.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信