Oxygen Consumption In Vivo by Ultra-High Dose Rate Electron Irradiation Depends Upon Baseline Tissue Oxygenation.

IF 6.4 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Jacob P Sunnerberg, Armin D Tavakkoli, Arthur F Petusseau, Noah J Daniel, Austin M Sloop, Wilson A Schreiber, Jiang Gui, Rongxiao Zhang, Harold M Swartz, P Jack Hoopes, David J Gladstone, Sergei A Vinogradov, Brian W Pogue
{"title":"Oxygen Consumption In Vivo by Ultra-High Dose Rate Electron Irradiation Depends Upon Baseline Tissue Oxygenation.","authors":"Jacob P Sunnerberg, Armin D Tavakkoli, Arthur F Petusseau, Noah J Daniel, Austin M Sloop, Wilson A Schreiber, Jiang Gui, Rongxiao Zhang, Harold M Swartz, P Jack Hoopes, David J Gladstone, Sergei A Vinogradov, Brian W Pogue","doi":"10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.10.018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to assess the impact of tissue oxygen levels on transient oxygen consumption induced by ultra-high dose rate (UHDR) electron radiation in murine flank and to examine the effect of dose rate variations on this relationship.</p><p><strong>Methods and materials: </strong>Real-time oximetry using the phosphorescence quenching method and Oxyphor PdG4 molecular probe was employed. Continuous measurements were taken during radiation delivery on a UHDR-capable Mobetron linear accelerator. Oxyphor PdG4 was administered into the subcutaneous tissue of the flank skin 1 hour before irradiation. Skin oxygen tension (pO<sub>2</sub>) was manipulated by adjusting oxygen content in the inhaled gas mixture and/or by vasculature compression. A skin surface radiation dose of 19.8 ± 0.3 Gy was verified using a calibrated semiconductor diode dosimeter. Dose rate was varied across the UHDR range by changing linear accelerator cone length and pulse repetition frequency.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The decrease in pO<sub>2</sub> per unit dose during radiation delivery, termed oxygen consumption g-value (g<sub>O2</sub>, mmHg/Gy), was significantly influenced by tissue oxygen levels in the range 0 to 65 mmHg under UHDR conditions. Within the 0 to 20 mmHg range, g<sub>O2</sub> exhibited a sharp increase with rising baseline pO<sub>2</sub>, plateauing at 0.26 mmHg/Gy. Dose rate variations (mean values, 25-1170 Gy/s; per pulse doses of 2.5-9.8 Gy) were explored by varying both cone length and pulse repetition frequency (10-120 Hz) with no significant changes in g<sub>O2</sub>. Conventional dose rate irradiation resulted in no discernible changes in pO<sub>2</sub>.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results show significant differences in the radiation-chemical effects of UHDR radiation between hypoxic and well-oxygenated tissues. Similar trends between earlier published in vitro and in vivo experiments presented herein suggest the chemical mechanisms driving the dependencies of g<sub>O2</sub> on pO<sub>2</sub> are similar, potentially underpinning the FLASH effect. Importantly, significant variations in baseline pO<sub>2</sub> were observed in animals kept under identical conditions, underscoring the necessity to control and monitor tissue oxygen levels for preclinical investigations and future clinical applications of FLASH radiation therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":14215,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.10.018","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to assess the impact of tissue oxygen levels on transient oxygen consumption induced by ultra-high dose rate (UHDR) electron radiation in murine flank and to examine the effect of dose rate variations on this relationship.

Methods and materials: Real-time oximetry using the phosphorescence quenching method and Oxyphor PdG4 molecular probe was employed. Continuous measurements were taken during radiation delivery on a UHDR-capable Mobetron linear accelerator. Oxyphor PdG4 was administered into the subcutaneous tissue of the flank skin 1 hour before irradiation. Skin oxygen tension (pO2) was manipulated by adjusting oxygen content in the inhaled gas mixture and/or by vasculature compression. A skin surface radiation dose of 19.8 ± 0.3 Gy was verified using a calibrated semiconductor diode dosimeter. Dose rate was varied across the UHDR range by changing linear accelerator cone length and pulse repetition frequency.

Results: The decrease in pO2 per unit dose during radiation delivery, termed oxygen consumption g-value (gO2, mmHg/Gy), was significantly influenced by tissue oxygen levels in the range 0 to 65 mmHg under UHDR conditions. Within the 0 to 20 mmHg range, gO2 exhibited a sharp increase with rising baseline pO2, plateauing at 0.26 mmHg/Gy. Dose rate variations (mean values, 25-1170 Gy/s; per pulse doses of 2.5-9.8 Gy) were explored by varying both cone length and pulse repetition frequency (10-120 Hz) with no significant changes in gO2. Conventional dose rate irradiation resulted in no discernible changes in pO2.

Conclusions: The results show significant differences in the radiation-chemical effects of UHDR radiation between hypoxic and well-oxygenated tissues. Similar trends between earlier published in vitro and in vivo experiments presented herein suggest the chemical mechanisms driving the dependencies of gO2 on pO2 are similar, potentially underpinning the FLASH effect. Importantly, significant variations in baseline pO2 were observed in animals kept under identical conditions, underscoring the necessity to control and monitor tissue oxygen levels for preclinical investigations and future clinical applications of FLASH radiation therapy.

超高剂量率电子辐照的体内耗氧量取决于基线组织氧合。
目的:本研究旨在评估组织氧水平对超高剂量率(UHDR)电子辐射诱导的小鼠侧腹瞬时耗氧量的影响,并探讨剂量率变化对这种关系的影响:方法:采用磷光淬灭法和 Oxyphor PdG4 分子探针进行实时血氧测量。在具有超高剂量率能力的 Mobetron 直线加速器(linac)上进行放射治疗期间,对血氧仪进行连续测量。照射前一小时,将 Oxyphor PdG4 注入侧腹皮肤的皮下组织。皮肤氧张力(pO2)是通过调整吸入混合气体中的氧气含量和/或血管压缩来控制的。皮肤表面辐射剂量为 19.8±0.3Gy,使用校准半导体剂量计进行验证。通过改变直列加速器锥长和脉冲重复频率(PRF),在超高辐射剂量范围内改变剂量率:结果:在超高剂量条件下,在 0-65mmHg 范围内,放射过程中单位剂量 pO2 的降低(称为耗氧量 g 值(gO2,mmHg/Gy))受组织氧水平的显著影响。在 0-20mmHg 范围内,gO2 随基线 pO2 的升高而急剧增加,在 0.26mmHg/Gy 时趋于稳定。通过改变锥体长度和 PRF(10-120Hz)来探索剂量率变化(平均值为 25-1170Gy/s,每脉冲剂量为 2.5-9.8Gy),结果 gO2 没有发生显著变化。常规剂量率照射导致 pO2 没有明显变化:结论:研究结果表明,超高辐射对缺氧组织和氧合良好组织的辐射-化学效应存在明显差异。本文介绍的早先发表的体外和体内实验之间的相似趋势表明,驱动 gO2 与 pO2 依赖关系的化学机制是相似的,这可能是 FLASH 效应的基础。重要的是,在相同条件下饲养的动物基线 pO2 存在显著差异,这突出表明在临床前研究和未来 FLASH-RT 临床应用中控制和监测组织氧水平的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
7.10%
发文量
2538
审稿时长
6.6 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Radiation Oncology • Biology • Physics (IJROBP), known in the field as the Red Journal, publishes original laboratory and clinical investigations related to radiation oncology, radiation biology, medical physics, and both education and health policy as it relates to the field. This journal has a particular interest in original contributions of the following types: prospective clinical trials, outcomes research, and large database interrogation. In addition, it seeks reports of high-impact innovations in single or combined modality treatment, tumor sensitization, normal tissue protection (including both precision avoidance and pharmacologic means), brachytherapy, particle irradiation, and cancer imaging. Technical advances related to dosimetry and conformal radiation treatment planning are of interest, as are basic science studies investigating tumor physiology and the molecular biology underlying cancer and normal tissue radiation response.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信