Impact of gestational age on the management of acute appendicitis during pregnancy: A nationwide observational study.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Shunya Sugai, Yusuke Sasabuchi, Hideo Yasunaga, Shotaro Aso, Hiroki Matsui, Kiyohide Fushimi, Kosuke Yoshihara, Koji Nishijima
{"title":"Impact of gestational age on the management of acute appendicitis during pregnancy: A nationwide observational study.","authors":"Shunya Sugai, Yusuke Sasabuchi, Hideo Yasunaga, Shotaro Aso, Hiroki Matsui, Kiyohide Fushimi, Kosuke Yoshihara, Koji Nishijima","doi":"10.1002/ijgo.15953","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare conservative management and appendectomy for acute appendicitis during pregnancy by trimester.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study used data from a national inpatient database from July 2010 to March 2022. Pregnant women diagnosed with acute appendicitis were included. Multivariable analysis using generalized estimating equations was performed to compare outcomes between conservative management and appendectomy across trimesters. The main outcomes were preterm labor, preterm delivery, or abortion; antepartum hemorrhage; duration of hospitalization; and duration of antibiotic use.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 3158 individuals from 632 acute-care hospitals were eligible. The proportion of conservative management versus appendectomy by trimester were 507 (49.1%) versus 525 (50.9%) in the first, 690 (44.6%) versus 856 (55.4%) in the second, and 337 (58.1%) versus 243 (41.9%) in the third. In the second trimester, appendectomy was associated with a higher rate of preterm delivery, preterm labor, or abortion (odds ratio [OR], 2.91 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.62-5.25]). Antepartum hemorrhage occurred more frequently for appendectomy in the first (OR, 2.12 [95% CI, 1.31-3.43]) and third (OR, 2.43 [95% CI, 1.79-3.31]) trimesters. Appendectomy was associated with a longer duration of hospitalization in the second (2.15 days; 95% CI, 1.14-3.17 days) and third (3.97 days; 95% CI, 2.22-5.71 days) trimesters. Antibiotic use duration was shorter for appendectomy in the first (-1.20 days [95% CI -1.51 to -0.90 days]) and second (-0.61 days [95% CI -0.90 to -0.32 days]) trimesters.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Clinical outcomes of acute appendicitis during pregnancy vary by trimester. Considering the appendectomy risks, conservative management may be viable depending on the clinical context and trimester.</p>","PeriodicalId":14164,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.15953","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To compare conservative management and appendectomy for acute appendicitis during pregnancy by trimester.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study used data from a national inpatient database from July 2010 to March 2022. Pregnant women diagnosed with acute appendicitis were included. Multivariable analysis using generalized estimating equations was performed to compare outcomes between conservative management and appendectomy across trimesters. The main outcomes were preterm labor, preterm delivery, or abortion; antepartum hemorrhage; duration of hospitalization; and duration of antibiotic use.

Results: A total of 3158 individuals from 632 acute-care hospitals were eligible. The proportion of conservative management versus appendectomy by trimester were 507 (49.1%) versus 525 (50.9%) in the first, 690 (44.6%) versus 856 (55.4%) in the second, and 337 (58.1%) versus 243 (41.9%) in the third. In the second trimester, appendectomy was associated with a higher rate of preterm delivery, preterm labor, or abortion (odds ratio [OR], 2.91 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.62-5.25]). Antepartum hemorrhage occurred more frequently for appendectomy in the first (OR, 2.12 [95% CI, 1.31-3.43]) and third (OR, 2.43 [95% CI, 1.79-3.31]) trimesters. Appendectomy was associated with a longer duration of hospitalization in the second (2.15 days; 95% CI, 1.14-3.17 days) and third (3.97 days; 95% CI, 2.22-5.71 days) trimesters. Antibiotic use duration was shorter for appendectomy in the first (-1.20 days [95% CI -1.51 to -0.90 days]) and second (-0.61 days [95% CI -0.90 to -0.32 days]) trimesters.

Conclusions: Clinical outcomes of acute appendicitis during pregnancy vary by trimester. Considering the appendectomy risks, conservative management may be viable depending on the clinical context and trimester.

孕龄对妊娠期急性阑尾炎治疗的影响:一项全国性观察研究。
目的:比较孕期急性阑尾炎的保守治疗和阑尾切除术:比较妊娠期急性阑尾炎的保守治疗和阑尾切除术(按孕期划分):这项回顾性队列研究使用的数据来自 2010 年 7 月至 2022 年 3 月的全国住院患者数据库。研究纳入了确诊为急性阑尾炎的孕妇。使用广义估计方程进行多变量分析,比较保守治疗和阑尾切除术在不同孕期的治疗效果。主要结果包括早产、早产或流产;产前出血;住院时间;使用抗生素的时间:共有来自 632 家急诊医院的 3158 人符合条件。各孕期保守治疗与阑尾切除术的比例分别为:第一孕期 507 例(49.1%)对 525 例(50.9%),第二孕期 690 例(44.6%)对 856 例(55.4%),第三孕期 337 例(58.1%)对 243 例(41.9%)。在第二个孕期,阑尾切除术与较高的早产、早产或流产率相关(几率比 [OR],2.91 [95% 置信区间 (CI),1.62-5.25])。第一(OR,2.12 [95% CI,1.31-3.43])和第三(OR,2.43 [95% CI,1.79-3.31])个月进行阑尾切除术时,产前出血发生率较高。阑尾切除术与第二孕期(2.15 天;95% CI,1.14-3.17 天)和第三孕期(3.97 天;95% CI,2.22-5.71 天)住院时间较长有关。第一孕期(-1.20 天 [95% CI -1.51 到 -0.90 天])和第二孕期(-0.61 天 [95% CI -0.90 到 -0.32 天])阑尾切除术的抗生素使用时间较短:结论:妊娠期急性阑尾炎的临床结果因孕期而异。考虑到阑尾切除术的风险,保守治疗可能是可行的,这取决于临床情况和妊娠期。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
2.60%
发文量
493
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics publishes articles on all aspects of basic and clinical research in the fields of obstetrics and gynecology and related subjects, with emphasis on matters of worldwide interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信