Assessment of Phosphine Resistance in Major Stored-Product Insects in Greece Using Two Diagnostic Protocols.

IF 2.7 2区 农林科学 Q1 ENTOMOLOGY
Insects Pub Date : 2024-10-14 DOI:10.3390/insects15100802
Paraskevi Agrafioti, Efstathios Kaloudis, Dimitrios Kateris, Christos G Athanassiou
{"title":"Assessment of Phosphine Resistance in Major Stored-Product Insects in Greece Using Two Diagnostic Protocols.","authors":"Paraskevi Agrafioti, Efstathios Kaloudis, Dimitrios Kateris, Christos G Athanassiou","doi":"10.3390/insects15100802","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Post-harvest losses due to insect infestation and spoilage by bacteria and molds pose significant challenges to global cereal production. This study investigates the prevalence of resistance to phosphine, a commonly used grain protection agent, in stored-grain insects. The research, conducted in various storage facilities across Greece, examined 53 populations of key stored-product insect species. Two assessment protocols, namely, dose-response (at 50-1000 ppm for 3 days exposure) and CORESTA (at 300 ppm for 6 days), were used herein to estimate phosphine resistance. The results showed that 13.3% of field populations were resistant, and mortality rates increased with higher phosphine concentrations. Specifically, according to the dose-response protocol, among the 53 field populations, 37.7% were found to be resistant to phosphine, namely, two populations of <i>O. surinamensis</i>, one of <i>S. oryzae</i>, seven of <i>T. confusum</i>, one of <i>C. ferrugineus</i>, one of <i>T. castaneum</i>, and all populations of <i>R. dominica</i>, whereas, according to the CORESTA protocol, all populations were found to be susceptible to phosphine. The observed resistance patterns differ from those reported in other regions of the world. The study highlights the importance of tailored fumigation strategies, considering insect species varying susceptibility to phosphine. It recommends the use of best management practices and rotational strategies, such as combining phosphine with other methods, to develop effective resistance management plans. The results provide valuable insights into the dynamic landscape of phosphine resistance in stored-product insects and suggest potential avenues for further research and control measures.</p>","PeriodicalId":13642,"journal":{"name":"Insects","volume":"15 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11508417/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Insects","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/insects15100802","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENTOMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Post-harvest losses due to insect infestation and spoilage by bacteria and molds pose significant challenges to global cereal production. This study investigates the prevalence of resistance to phosphine, a commonly used grain protection agent, in stored-grain insects. The research, conducted in various storage facilities across Greece, examined 53 populations of key stored-product insect species. Two assessment protocols, namely, dose-response (at 50-1000 ppm for 3 days exposure) and CORESTA (at 300 ppm for 6 days), were used herein to estimate phosphine resistance. The results showed that 13.3% of field populations were resistant, and mortality rates increased with higher phosphine concentrations. Specifically, according to the dose-response protocol, among the 53 field populations, 37.7% were found to be resistant to phosphine, namely, two populations of O. surinamensis, one of S. oryzae, seven of T. confusum, one of C. ferrugineus, one of T. castaneum, and all populations of R. dominica, whereas, according to the CORESTA protocol, all populations were found to be susceptible to phosphine. The observed resistance patterns differ from those reported in other regions of the world. The study highlights the importance of tailored fumigation strategies, considering insect species varying susceptibility to phosphine. It recommends the use of best management practices and rotational strategies, such as combining phosphine with other methods, to develop effective resistance management plans. The results provide valuable insights into the dynamic landscape of phosphine resistance in stored-product insects and suggest potential avenues for further research and control measures.

使用两种诊断方案评估希腊主要储藏产品昆虫对磷化氢的抗性。
虫害以及细菌和霉菌腐败造成的收获后损失对全球谷物生产构成了重大挑战。这项研究调查了储粮昆虫对常用谷物保护剂磷化氢的抗药性。这项研究在希腊各地的不同储藏设施中进行,考察了 53 种主要储藏产品昆虫种群。研究采用了两种评估方案,即剂量-反应(50-1000 ppm,接触 3 天)和 CORESTA(300 ppm,接触 6 天),来估算磷化氢的抗药性。结果表明,13.3% 的田间种群具有抗性,死亡率随着磷化氢浓度的升高而增加。具体而言,根据剂量反应方案,在 53 个田间种群中,37.7% 对磷化氢具有抗性,即 2 个 O. surinamensis 种群、1 个 S. oryzae 种群、7 个 T. confusum 种群、1 个 C. ferrugineus 种群、1 个 T. castaneum 种群和所有 R. dominica 种群。观察到的抗性模式与世界其他地区报告的抗性模式不同。这项研究强调,考虑到昆虫物种对磷化氢的敏感性各不相同,有针对性地制定熏蒸策略非常重要。研究建议采用最佳管理方法和轮换策略,如将磷化氢与其他方法相结合,以制定有效的抗性管理计划。研究结果为了解贮藏产品昆虫对磷化氢的抗性动态提供了宝贵的见解,并为进一步的研究和控制措施提出了潜在的途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Insects
Insects Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Insect Science
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
10.00%
发文量
1013
审稿时长
21.77 days
期刊介绍: Insects (ISSN 2075-4450) is an international, peer-reviewed open access journal of entomology published by MDPI online quarterly. It publishes reviews, research papers and communications related to the biology, physiology and the behavior of insects and arthropods. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Electronic files regarding the full details of the experimental procedure, if unable to be published in a normal way, can be deposited as supplementary material.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信