Association between adjunctive rifampin and gentamicin use and outcomes for patients with staphylococcal prosthetic valve endocarditis: a propensity-score adjusted retrospective cohort study.

IF 5.4 2区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Hiroyuki Suzuki, Abhishek Pandya, Shinya Hasegawa, Joseph Tholany
{"title":"Association between adjunctive rifampin and gentamicin use and outcomes for patients with staphylococcal prosthetic valve endocarditis: a propensity-score adjusted retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Hiroyuki Suzuki, Abhishek Pandya, Shinya Hasegawa, Joseph Tholany","doi":"10.1007/s15010-024-02421-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Although guidelines recommend adjunctive rifampin and gentamicin use for patients with staphylococcal prosthetic valve endocarditis (PVE), evidence behind the recommendation is limited and conflicting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective cohort study of all patients with staphylococcal PVE within the Veterans Health Administration during 2003-2021. Patients were identified with diagnostic codes for prosthetic valves and positive blood cultures for Staphylococcus species and confirmed via manual chart reviews. The primary outcome was the composite of all-cause mortality or recurrence of staphylococcal PVE within one year from diagnosis. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to estimate the probability of individuals receiving rifampin using propensity scores. IPTW-adjusted multivariable Cox regression analysis was used to compare outcomes between patients who received rifampin and gentamicin, and those did not.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 373 patients with staphylococcal PVE, 275 (73.7%) and 225 (60.3%) received at least one dose of rifampin and gentamicin, respectively. The incidence of staphylococcal PVE increased from 0.47 (2003-11) to 0.77 (2012-21) per 10,000 hospitalizations. Gentamicin use declined over time (70.1% in 2003-2011 to 54.8% in 2012-2021, p = 0.04) while rifampin use did not change significantly (76.1% in 2003-2011 to 72.4% in 2012-2021, p = 0.43). The composite outcome was observed in 209 (56.0%). Neither rifampin use (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.77, 95% CI 0.48-1.24) and gentamicin use (adjusted HR 1.11, 95% CI 0.71-1.74) was associated with the composite outcome.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>No significant association was observed between adjunctive rifampin or gentamicin use and improved outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":13600,"journal":{"name":"Infection","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infection","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s15010-024-02421-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Although guidelines recommend adjunctive rifampin and gentamicin use for patients with staphylococcal prosthetic valve endocarditis (PVE), evidence behind the recommendation is limited and conflicting.

Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of all patients with staphylococcal PVE within the Veterans Health Administration during 2003-2021. Patients were identified with diagnostic codes for prosthetic valves and positive blood cultures for Staphylococcus species and confirmed via manual chart reviews. The primary outcome was the composite of all-cause mortality or recurrence of staphylococcal PVE within one year from diagnosis. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to estimate the probability of individuals receiving rifampin using propensity scores. IPTW-adjusted multivariable Cox regression analysis was used to compare outcomes between patients who received rifampin and gentamicin, and those did not.

Results: Among 373 patients with staphylococcal PVE, 275 (73.7%) and 225 (60.3%) received at least one dose of rifampin and gentamicin, respectively. The incidence of staphylococcal PVE increased from 0.47 (2003-11) to 0.77 (2012-21) per 10,000 hospitalizations. Gentamicin use declined over time (70.1% in 2003-2011 to 54.8% in 2012-2021, p = 0.04) while rifampin use did not change significantly (76.1% in 2003-2011 to 72.4% in 2012-2021, p = 0.43). The composite outcome was observed in 209 (56.0%). Neither rifampin use (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.77, 95% CI 0.48-1.24) and gentamicin use (adjusted HR 1.11, 95% CI 0.71-1.74) was associated with the composite outcome.

Conclusion: No significant association was observed between adjunctive rifampin or gentamicin use and improved outcomes.

葡萄球菌人工瓣膜心内膜炎患者辅助使用利福平和庆大霉素与预后之间的关系:一项倾向分数调整后的回顾性队列研究。
目的:尽管指南建议对葡萄球菌性人工瓣膜心内膜炎(PVE)患者辅助使用利福平和庆大霉素,但该建议背后的证据有限且相互矛盾:我们对退伍军人健康管理局 2003-2021 年间所有患有葡萄球菌 PVE 的患者进行了一项回顾性队列研究。通过人工瓣膜诊断代码和阳性葡萄球菌血液培养确定患者,并通过人工病历审查进行确认。主要结果是全因死亡率或确诊后一年内葡萄球菌性 PVE 复发的综合结果。使用倾向评分估算个体接受利福平治疗的概率时,采用了逆治疗概率加权法(IPTW)。使用IPTW调整后的多变量Cox回归分析比较了接受利福平和庆大霉素治疗的患者与未接受利福平和庆大霉素治疗的患者的治疗效果:在373例葡萄球菌PVE患者中,分别有275例(73.7%)和225例(60.3%)接受了至少一次利福平和庆大霉素治疗。每 10,000 例住院患者中葡萄球菌 PVE 的发病率从 0.47 例(2003-2011 年)上升至 0.77 例(2012-21 年)。随着时间的推移,庆大霉素的使用率有所下降(2003-2011 年为 70.1%,2012-2021 年为 54.8%,p = 0.04),而利福平的使用率变化不大(2003-2011 年为 76.1%,2012-2021 年为 72.4%,p = 0.43)。有 209 例(56.0%)观察到了综合结果。利福平(调整后危险比 [HR] 0.77,95% CI 0.48-1.24)和庆大霉素(调整后危险比 1.11,95% CI 0.71-1.74)的使用均与综合结果无关:结论:在辅助使用利福平或庆大霉素与改善预后之间未观察到明显关联。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Infection
Infection 医学-传染病学
CiteScore
12.50
自引率
1.30%
发文量
224
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Infection is a journal dedicated to serving as a global forum for the presentation and discussion of clinically relevant information on infectious diseases. Its primary goal is to engage readers and contributors from various regions around the world in the exchange of knowledge about the etiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment of infectious diseases, both in outpatient and inpatient settings. The journal covers a wide range of topics, including: Etiology: The study of the causes of infectious diseases. Pathogenesis: The process by which an infectious agent causes disease. Diagnosis: The methods and techniques used to identify infectious diseases. Treatment: The medical interventions and strategies employed to treat infectious diseases. Public Health: Issues of local, regional, or international significance related to infectious diseases, including prevention, control, and management strategies. Hospital Epidemiology: The study of the spread of infectious diseases within healthcare settings and the measures to prevent nosocomial infections. In addition to these, Infection also includes a specialized "Images" section, which focuses on high-quality visual content, such as images, photographs, and microscopic slides, accompanied by brief abstracts. This section is designed to highlight the clinical and diagnostic value of visual aids in the field of infectious diseases, as many conditions present with characteristic clinical signs that can be diagnosed through inspection, and imaging and microscopy are crucial for accurate diagnosis. The journal's comprehensive approach ensures that it remains a valuable resource for healthcare professionals and researchers in the field of infectious diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信