Association between adjunctive rifampin and gentamicin use and outcomes for patients with staphylococcal prosthetic valve endocarditis: a propensity-score adjusted retrospective cohort study.
Hiroyuki Suzuki, Abhishek Pandya, Shinya Hasegawa, Joseph Tholany
{"title":"Association between adjunctive rifampin and gentamicin use and outcomes for patients with staphylococcal prosthetic valve endocarditis: a propensity-score adjusted retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Hiroyuki Suzuki, Abhishek Pandya, Shinya Hasegawa, Joseph Tholany","doi":"10.1007/s15010-024-02421-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Although guidelines recommend adjunctive rifampin and gentamicin use for patients with staphylococcal prosthetic valve endocarditis (PVE), evidence behind the recommendation is limited and conflicting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective cohort study of all patients with staphylococcal PVE within the Veterans Health Administration during 2003-2021. Patients were identified with diagnostic codes for prosthetic valves and positive blood cultures for Staphylococcus species and confirmed via manual chart reviews. The primary outcome was the composite of all-cause mortality or recurrence of staphylococcal PVE within one year from diagnosis. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to estimate the probability of individuals receiving rifampin using propensity scores. IPTW-adjusted multivariable Cox regression analysis was used to compare outcomes between patients who received rifampin and gentamicin, and those did not.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 373 patients with staphylococcal PVE, 275 (73.7%) and 225 (60.3%) received at least one dose of rifampin and gentamicin, respectively. The incidence of staphylococcal PVE increased from 0.47 (2003-11) to 0.77 (2012-21) per 10,000 hospitalizations. Gentamicin use declined over time (70.1% in 2003-2011 to 54.8% in 2012-2021, p = 0.04) while rifampin use did not change significantly (76.1% in 2003-2011 to 72.4% in 2012-2021, p = 0.43). The composite outcome was observed in 209 (56.0%). Neither rifampin use (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.77, 95% CI 0.48-1.24) and gentamicin use (adjusted HR 1.11, 95% CI 0.71-1.74) was associated with the composite outcome.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>No significant association was observed between adjunctive rifampin or gentamicin use and improved outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":13600,"journal":{"name":"Infection","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infection","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s15010-024-02421-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Although guidelines recommend adjunctive rifampin and gentamicin use for patients with staphylococcal prosthetic valve endocarditis (PVE), evidence behind the recommendation is limited and conflicting.
Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of all patients with staphylococcal PVE within the Veterans Health Administration during 2003-2021. Patients were identified with diagnostic codes for prosthetic valves and positive blood cultures for Staphylococcus species and confirmed via manual chart reviews. The primary outcome was the composite of all-cause mortality or recurrence of staphylococcal PVE within one year from diagnosis. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to estimate the probability of individuals receiving rifampin using propensity scores. IPTW-adjusted multivariable Cox regression analysis was used to compare outcomes between patients who received rifampin and gentamicin, and those did not.
Results: Among 373 patients with staphylococcal PVE, 275 (73.7%) and 225 (60.3%) received at least one dose of rifampin and gentamicin, respectively. The incidence of staphylococcal PVE increased from 0.47 (2003-11) to 0.77 (2012-21) per 10,000 hospitalizations. Gentamicin use declined over time (70.1% in 2003-2011 to 54.8% in 2012-2021, p = 0.04) while rifampin use did not change significantly (76.1% in 2003-2011 to 72.4% in 2012-2021, p = 0.43). The composite outcome was observed in 209 (56.0%). Neither rifampin use (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.77, 95% CI 0.48-1.24) and gentamicin use (adjusted HR 1.11, 95% CI 0.71-1.74) was associated with the composite outcome.
Conclusion: No significant association was observed between adjunctive rifampin or gentamicin use and improved outcomes.
期刊介绍:
Infection is a journal dedicated to serving as a global forum for the presentation and discussion of clinically relevant information on infectious diseases. Its primary goal is to engage readers and contributors from various regions around the world in the exchange of knowledge about the etiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment of infectious diseases, both in outpatient and inpatient settings.
The journal covers a wide range of topics, including:
Etiology: The study of the causes of infectious diseases.
Pathogenesis: The process by which an infectious agent causes disease.
Diagnosis: The methods and techniques used to identify infectious diseases.
Treatment: The medical interventions and strategies employed to treat infectious diseases.
Public Health: Issues of local, regional, or international significance related to infectious diseases, including prevention, control, and management strategies.
Hospital Epidemiology: The study of the spread of infectious diseases within healthcare settings and the measures to prevent nosocomial infections.
In addition to these, Infection also includes a specialized "Images" section, which focuses on high-quality visual content, such as images, photographs, and microscopic slides, accompanied by brief abstracts. This section is designed to highlight the clinical and diagnostic value of visual aids in the field of infectious diseases, as many conditions present with characteristic clinical signs that can be diagnosed through inspection, and imaging and microscopy are crucial for accurate diagnosis. The journal's comprehensive approach ensures that it remains a valuable resource for healthcare professionals and researchers in the field of infectious diseases.