Basketball self-evaluation matrix: discrepancy between self-confidence and decision-making performance on psychological profiling of players.

IF 2.3 Q2 SPORT SCIENCES
Frontiers in Sports and Active Living Pub Date : 2024-10-09 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fspor.2024.1404701
Mengru Liu, Anthony Kong, Newman Lau, Zeping Feng, Xi Liu
{"title":"Basketball self-evaluation matrix: discrepancy between self-confidence and decision-making performance on psychological profiling of players.","authors":"Mengru Liu, Anthony Kong, Newman Lau, Zeping Feng, Xi Liu","doi":"10.3389/fspor.2024.1404701","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In basketball training, self-evaluation plays a crucial role in the decision-making and execution of movements of players. The self-evaluation of players is influenced by their perception of own basketball ability and self-confidence state. This study aimed to explore potential discrepancies between self-confidence levels of players and their decision-making performance, while also characterizing different types of players.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Data was collected from 20 youth basketball players who participated in a decision-making video task and a self-confidence assessment. Based on data from their self-confidence and decision-making awareness assessment, the K-means cluster analysis was used to categorize the players into different groups. Then, ANOVA and <i>post hoc</i> Scheffe test were conducted to compare these clusters.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The cluster analysis identified four distinct profiles of players and the results of the ANOVA and <i>post hoc</i> Scheffe tests revealed significant differences between the four clusters. The \"High Self-confidence & Low Decision-making Awareness\" players might display an overconfident mindset, while the \"High Self-confidence & High Decision-making Awareness\" players potentially demonstrated the better performance and maintained a consistent and confident attitude. The \"Low Self-confidence & High Decision-making Awareness\" players appeared to lack confidence and needed to foster greater faith in their abilities. Finally, the \"Low Self-confidence & Low Decision-making Awareness\" players required a long-term and comprehensive training program to improve their skills.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>These preliminary findings informed the development of a self-evaluation matrix, designed to help coaches better understand player profiles and design tailored interventions. Moreover, this study contributes on sport calibration and enhances understanding of the behavioral and psychological states of players.</p>","PeriodicalId":12716,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Sports and Active Living","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11496061/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Sports and Active Living","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2024.1404701","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In basketball training, self-evaluation plays a crucial role in the decision-making and execution of movements of players. The self-evaluation of players is influenced by their perception of own basketball ability and self-confidence state. This study aimed to explore potential discrepancies between self-confidence levels of players and their decision-making performance, while also characterizing different types of players.

Method: Data was collected from 20 youth basketball players who participated in a decision-making video task and a self-confidence assessment. Based on data from their self-confidence and decision-making awareness assessment, the K-means cluster analysis was used to categorize the players into different groups. Then, ANOVA and post hoc Scheffe test were conducted to compare these clusters.

Results: The cluster analysis identified four distinct profiles of players and the results of the ANOVA and post hoc Scheffe tests revealed significant differences between the four clusters. The "High Self-confidence & Low Decision-making Awareness" players might display an overconfident mindset, while the "High Self-confidence & High Decision-making Awareness" players potentially demonstrated the better performance and maintained a consistent and confident attitude. The "Low Self-confidence & High Decision-making Awareness" players appeared to lack confidence and needed to foster greater faith in their abilities. Finally, the "Low Self-confidence & Low Decision-making Awareness" players required a long-term and comprehensive training program to improve their skills.

Discussion: These preliminary findings informed the development of a self-evaluation matrix, designed to help coaches better understand player profiles and design tailored interventions. Moreover, this study contributes on sport calibration and enhances understanding of the behavioral and psychological states of players.

篮球自我评价矩阵:球员心理分析中自信心与决策表现之间的差异。
背景:在篮球训练中,自我评价对球员的决策和动作执行起着至关重要的作用。球员的自我评价受其对自身篮球能力的认知和自信心状态的影响。本研究旨在探讨球员的自信心水平与其决策表现之间的潜在差异,同时了解不同类型球员的特点:方法:收集了 20 名青少年篮球运动员的数据,他们参与了决策视频任务和自信心评估。根据自信心和决策意识评估的数据,采用 K-means 聚类分析法将球员分为不同的组别。然后,通过方差分析和事后 Scheffe 检验对这些聚类进行比较:结果:聚类分析确定了四种不同的球员特征,方差分析和事后 Scheffe 检验的结果显示,四个聚类之间存在显著差异。高自信心和低决策意识 "的球员可能表现出过度自信的心态,而 "高自信心和高决策意识 "的球员则可能表现出更好的表现,并保持一贯的自信态度。低自信心和高决策意识 "选手似乎缺乏自信,需要对自己的能力抱有更大的信心。最后,"低自信心和低决策意识 "球员需要长期和全面的训练计划来提高他们的技能:这些初步研究结果为制定自我评估矩阵提供了依据,旨在帮助教练员更好地了解球员的情况并设计有针对性的干预措施。此外,这项研究还有助于体育校准,并增进对球员行为和心理状态的了解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
7.40%
发文量
459
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信