Cost-Effectiveness of GaitSmart and an Artificial Intelligence Solution for Rehabilitation of Patients Undergoing Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) and Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) in Older Population in the United Kingdom.

IF 2.1 Q3 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Fernando Zanghelini, Aisling Ponzo, Georgios Xydopoulos, Richard Fordham, Saval Khanal
{"title":"Cost-Effectiveness of GaitSmart and an Artificial Intelligence Solution for Rehabilitation of Patients Undergoing Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) and Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) in Older Population in the United Kingdom.","authors":"Fernando Zanghelini, Aisling Ponzo, Georgios Xydopoulos, Richard Fordham, Saval Khanal","doi":"10.3390/geriatrics9050129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>GaitSmart (GS) is a sensor-based digital medical device that can be used with the integrated app vGym to provide a personalised rehabilitation programme for older people undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) or total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This study aimed to determine whether the GS intervention used in the rehabilitation of older people undergoing THA or TKA is potentially cost-effective compared to the current standard of care (SoC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Decision-analytic modelling was conducted to estimate the cost-effectiveness over a seventeen-week time horizon from an NHS perspective. UK clinical and cost data from the GaitSmart randomised clinical trial was used to obtain the input parameters, and a sensitivity analysis was performed to address uncertainties.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over a seventeen-week time horizon, GS incurred cost savings of GBP 450.56 and a 0.02 gain in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) compared to the SoC. These results indicate that GS is the dominant intervention because the device demonstrated greater effectiveness and lower costs. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses confirm the robustness of our results.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>GS appears to offer short-term efficiency benefits and demonstrates cost-effectiveness for the improvement in gait in people undergoing THA or TKA, compared to the SoC.</p>","PeriodicalId":12653,"journal":{"name":"Geriatrics","volume":"9 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11508099/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geriatrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/geriatrics9050129","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: GaitSmart (GS) is a sensor-based digital medical device that can be used with the integrated app vGym to provide a personalised rehabilitation programme for older people undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) or total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This study aimed to determine whether the GS intervention used in the rehabilitation of older people undergoing THA or TKA is potentially cost-effective compared to the current standard of care (SoC).

Methods: Decision-analytic modelling was conducted to estimate the cost-effectiveness over a seventeen-week time horizon from an NHS perspective. UK clinical and cost data from the GaitSmart randomised clinical trial was used to obtain the input parameters, and a sensitivity analysis was performed to address uncertainties.

Results: Over a seventeen-week time horizon, GS incurred cost savings of GBP 450.56 and a 0.02 gain in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) compared to the SoC. These results indicate that GS is the dominant intervention because the device demonstrated greater effectiveness and lower costs. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses confirm the robustness of our results.

Conclusions: GS appears to offer short-term efficiency benefits and demonstrates cost-effectiveness for the improvement in gait in people undergoing THA or TKA, compared to the SoC.

英国老年人群中接受全髋关节置换术 (THA) 和全膝关节置换术 (TKA) 患者康复治疗的 GaitSmart 和人工智能解决方案的成本效益。
背景介绍步态智能(GS)是一种基于传感器的数字医疗设备,可与集成应用程序vGym一起使用,为接受全髋关节置换术(THA)或全膝关节置换术(TKA)的老年人提供个性化康复计划。本研究旨在确定在接受全髋关节置换术(THA)或全膝关节置换术(TKA)的老年人康复过程中使用的 GS 干预方案与当前的标准护理方案(SoC)相比是否具有潜在的成本效益:方法:从英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)的角度出发,建立决策分析模型来估算 17 周时间跨度内的成本效益。英国 GaitSmart 随机临床试验的临床和成本数据用于获取输入参数,并进行了敏感性分析以解决不确定性:在 17 周的时间跨度内,与 SoC 相比,GS 可节约成本 450.56 英镑,质量调整生命年(QALYs)增加 0.02。这些结果表明,GS 是最主要的干预措施,因为该设备显示出更高的有效性和更低的成本。概率敏感性分析证实了我们结果的稳健性:与SoC相比,GS在改善接受THA或TKA手术者的步态方面似乎具有短期效益和成本效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Geriatrics
Geriatrics 医学-老年医学
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
115
审稿时长
20.03 days
期刊介绍: • Geriatric biology • Geriatric health services research • Geriatric medicine research • Geriatric neurology, stroke, cognition and oncology • Geriatric surgery • Geriatric physical functioning, physical health and activity • Geriatric psychiatry and psychology • Geriatric nutrition • Geriatric epidemiology • Geriatric rehabilitation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信