Potential Prebiotic Effects of Artemisia capillaris-Derived Transglycosylated Product.

IF 4.7 2区 农林科学 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Foods Pub Date : 2024-10-14 DOI:10.3390/foods13203267
Heewon Moon, Keunsoo Kang, Misook Kim
{"title":"Potential Prebiotic Effects of <i>Artemisia capillaris</i>-Derived Transglycosylated Product.","authors":"Heewon Moon, Keunsoo Kang, Misook Kim","doi":"10.3390/foods13203267","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study investigated the impact of a transglycosylated product (ACOD) catalyzed by <i>Leuconostoc mesenteroides</i> MKSR dextransucrase using sucrose as a glucosyl donor and both maltose and <i>Artemisia capillaris</i> as acceptors on gut microbiota through fecal fermentation. ACOD promoted the growth of probiotics such as <i>Lactiplantibacillus plantarum</i>, <i>Lacticaseibacillus casei</i>, <i>Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus</i> GG, and <i>Leuconostoc mesenteroides</i> MKSR, while inhibiting the growth of pathogenic bacteria such as <i>Escherichia coli</i>, <i>E. coli</i> O157:H7, <i>Enterococcus faecalis</i>, <i>Listeria monocytogenes</i>, <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i>, <i>Shigella flexneri</i>, <i>Streptococcus mutans</i>, <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i>, and <i>Bacillus cereus</i> during independent cultivation. Fecal fermentation for 24 h revealed that ACOD significantly increased the production of short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) compared to the blank and fructoooligosaccharide (FOS) groups. Specifically, ACOD led to a 4.5-fold increase in acetic acid production compared to FOSs and a 3.3-fold increase in propionic acid production. Both the ACOD and FOS groups exhibited higher levels of butyric acid than the blank. Notably, ACOD significantly modulated the composition of the gut microbiota by increasing the relative abundances of <i>Lactobacillus</i> and decreasing <i>Escherichia/Shigella</i> and <i>Salmonella.</i> In contrast, FOSs remarkably promoted the growth of <i>Salmonella</i>. These findings suggest that ACOD is a potential candidate for prebiotics that improve the intestinal environment by being actively used by beneficial bacteria.</p>","PeriodicalId":12386,"journal":{"name":"Foods","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11507088/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foods","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13203267","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigated the impact of a transglycosylated product (ACOD) catalyzed by Leuconostoc mesenteroides MKSR dextransucrase using sucrose as a glucosyl donor and both maltose and Artemisia capillaris as acceptors on gut microbiota through fecal fermentation. ACOD promoted the growth of probiotics such as Lactiplantibacillus plantarum, Lacticaseibacillus casei, Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus GG, and Leuconostoc mesenteroides MKSR, while inhibiting the growth of pathogenic bacteria such as Escherichia coli, E. coli O157:H7, Enterococcus faecalis, Listeria monocytogenes, Staphylococcus aureus, Shigella flexneri, Streptococcus mutans, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Bacillus cereus during independent cultivation. Fecal fermentation for 24 h revealed that ACOD significantly increased the production of short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) compared to the blank and fructoooligosaccharide (FOS) groups. Specifically, ACOD led to a 4.5-fold increase in acetic acid production compared to FOSs and a 3.3-fold increase in propionic acid production. Both the ACOD and FOS groups exhibited higher levels of butyric acid than the blank. Notably, ACOD significantly modulated the composition of the gut microbiota by increasing the relative abundances of Lactobacillus and decreasing Escherichia/Shigella and Salmonella. In contrast, FOSs remarkably promoted the growth of Salmonella. These findings suggest that ACOD is a potential candidate for prebiotics that improve the intestinal environment by being actively used by beneficial bacteria.

茵陈蒿转糖基化产物的潜在益生作用
本研究通过粪便发酵,研究了由介尾亮珠菌 MKSR 右旋糖酐酶催化的、以蔗糖为葡萄糖基供体、麦芽糖和茵陈蒿为接受体的转糖基化产物(ACOD)对肠道微生物群的影响。ACOD 促进了益生菌如植物乳杆菌、壳寡糖乳杆菌、鼠李糖乳杆菌 GG 和介肠联念珠菌 MKSR 的生长,同时抑制了致病菌如大肠杆菌、大肠杆菌 O157:H7 和大肠杆菌 O157:H7 的生长。大肠杆菌 O157:H7、粪肠球菌、李斯特菌、金黄色葡萄球菌、柔性志贺氏菌、变异链球菌、铜绿假单胞菌和蜡样芽孢杆菌等致病菌的生长。粪便发酵 24 小时后发现,与空白组和果寡糖(FOS)组相比,ACOD 显著增加了短链脂肪酸(SCFA)的产生。具体来说,与 FOS 相比,ACOD 导致乙酸产量增加了 4.5 倍,丙酸产量增加了 3.3 倍。ACOD 组和 FOS 组的丁酸含量均高于空白组。值得注意的是,ACOD 通过提高乳酸杆菌的相对丰度和降低埃希氏菌/志贺氏菌和沙门氏菌的相对丰度,明显调节了肠道微生物群的组成。相比之下,果寡糖则明显促进了沙门氏菌的生长。这些研究结果表明,ACOD 是一种潜在的候选益生元,可通过被有益菌积极利用来改善肠道环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Foods
Foods Immunology and Microbiology-Microbiology
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
15.40%
发文量
3516
审稿时长
15.83 days
期刊介绍: Foods (ISSN 2304-8158) is an international, peer-reviewed scientific open access journal which provides an advanced forum for studies related to all aspects of food research. It publishes reviews, regular research papers and short communications. Our aim is to encourage scientists, researchers, and other food professionals to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible or share their knowledge with as much readers unlimitedly as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. There are, in addition, unique features of this journal: Ÿ manuscripts regarding research proposals and research ideas will be particularly welcomed Ÿ electronic files or software regarding the full details of the calculation and experimental procedure, if unable to be published in a normal way, can be deposited as supplementary material Ÿ we also accept manuscripts communicating to a broader audience with regard to research projects financed with public funds
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信