Deciphering the Cape Gooseberry Fruits Mycobiome for Further Safety Improvement Postharvest.

IF 4.7 2区 农林科学 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Foods Pub Date : 2024-10-12 DOI:10.3390/foods13203248
Gabriela N Tenea, Diana Molina
{"title":"Deciphering the Cape Gooseberry Fruits Mycobiome for Further Safety Improvement Postharvest.","authors":"Gabriela N Tenea, Diana Molina","doi":"10.3390/foods13203248","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cape gooseberries are exquisitely flavored fruits; their rapid deterioration reduces their shelf life. Understanding the unique mycobiome of fruit peels is an essential step in identifying the taxa causing postharvest loss. The current study proposes to analyze the fungal communities of cape gooseberry peels collected from an organic orchard at unripe and ripe stages and purchased from open-air market sites, using the ITS2 region metabarcoding. According to the Kruskal-Wallis test, there were no statistically significant differences found in either the phylogenetic or non-phylogenetic alpha diversity indices. Significant differences in fungal communities were observed between the market and orchard groups based on beta diversity results. <i>Ascomycota</i> (85.72-96.76%), <i>Basidiomycota</i> (3.21-13.91%), and <i>Chytridiomycota</i> (0.07-9.35%) were the most common fungal phyla, their abundance varying with the ripening stage and origin. <i>Dothideomycetes</i> in the orchard group and <i>Saccharomycetes</i> in the market group were the two most prevalent classes. Furthermore, we investigate which taxa showed a significant difference in abundance between the two conditions (market vs. orchard) using the analysis of compositions of microbiomes with bias correction (ANCOM-BC) test. Regardless of the phase, the orchard samples exhibited a notable increase in the mean absolute abundance of various beneficial fungal taxa, including <i>Tilletiopsis washingtonensis</i> and <i>Articulospora proliferata</i>, whereas the market samples demonstrated a high abundance of harmful yeasts and molds such as <i>Meyerozyma guilliermondii, Candida railenensis</i>, and <i>Botrytis caroliniana</i>. Although it is unclear how these microorganisms augment at the market sites and might impact the fruit quality after harvest, from a fruit safety perspective, it is essential to comprehend the diversity and variation of the mycobiome composition at different ripening stages to further develop strategies to improve food safety postharvest.</p>","PeriodicalId":12386,"journal":{"name":"Foods","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11506962/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foods","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13203248","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cape gooseberries are exquisitely flavored fruits; their rapid deterioration reduces their shelf life. Understanding the unique mycobiome of fruit peels is an essential step in identifying the taxa causing postharvest loss. The current study proposes to analyze the fungal communities of cape gooseberry peels collected from an organic orchard at unripe and ripe stages and purchased from open-air market sites, using the ITS2 region metabarcoding. According to the Kruskal-Wallis test, there were no statistically significant differences found in either the phylogenetic or non-phylogenetic alpha diversity indices. Significant differences in fungal communities were observed between the market and orchard groups based on beta diversity results. Ascomycota (85.72-96.76%), Basidiomycota (3.21-13.91%), and Chytridiomycota (0.07-9.35%) were the most common fungal phyla, their abundance varying with the ripening stage and origin. Dothideomycetes in the orchard group and Saccharomycetes in the market group were the two most prevalent classes. Furthermore, we investigate which taxa showed a significant difference in abundance between the two conditions (market vs. orchard) using the analysis of compositions of microbiomes with bias correction (ANCOM-BC) test. Regardless of the phase, the orchard samples exhibited a notable increase in the mean absolute abundance of various beneficial fungal taxa, including Tilletiopsis washingtonensis and Articulospora proliferata, whereas the market samples demonstrated a high abundance of harmful yeasts and molds such as Meyerozyma guilliermondii, Candida railenensis, and Botrytis caroliniana. Although it is unclear how these microorganisms augment at the market sites and might impact the fruit quality after harvest, from a fruit safety perspective, it is essential to comprehend the diversity and variation of the mycobiome composition at different ripening stages to further develop strategies to improve food safety postharvest.

解密鹅莓果霉菌生物群,进一步提高收获后的安全性。
开普鹅莓是风味独特的水果,其快速变质缩短了保质期。了解果皮中独特的真菌生物群是确定造成采后损失的类群的重要一步。目前的研究拟采用 ITS2 区域代谢编码,分析从有机果园收集的未熟和成熟阶段的岬鹅莓果皮以及从露天市场购买的岬鹅莓果皮的真菌群落。根据 Kruskal-Wallis 检验,系统发育或非系统发育阿尔法多样性指数均未发现显著的统计学差异。根据贝塔多样性结果,市场组和果园组之间的真菌群落存在显著差异。子囊菌门(85.72%-96.76%)、担子菌门(3.21%-13.91%)和糜烂菌门(0.07%-9.35%)是最常见的真菌门,它们的丰度随成熟阶段和产地而变化。果园组中的齿孢菌纲和市场组中的酵母菌纲是最常见的两类真菌。此外,我们还利用带偏差校正的微生物组成分分析(ANCOM-BC)检验法研究了哪些类群在两种条件下(市场与果园)的丰度有显著差异。无论在哪个阶段,果园样本中各种有益真菌类群(包括 Tilletiopsis washingtonensis 和 Articulospora proliferata)的平均绝对丰度都有明显增加,而市场样本中有害酵母菌和霉菌(如 Meyerozyma guilliermondii、Candida railenensis 和 Botrytis caroliniana)的丰度较高。虽然目前还不清楚这些微生物如何在市场上增加并可能影响采收后的水果质量,但从水果安全的角度来看,了解不同成熟阶段真菌生物群组成的多样性和变化对进一步制定改善采后食品安全的策略至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Foods
Foods Immunology and Microbiology-Microbiology
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
15.40%
发文量
3516
审稿时长
15.83 days
期刊介绍: Foods (ISSN 2304-8158) is an international, peer-reviewed scientific open access journal which provides an advanced forum for studies related to all aspects of food research. It publishes reviews, regular research papers and short communications. Our aim is to encourage scientists, researchers, and other food professionals to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible or share their knowledge with as much readers unlimitedly as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. There are, in addition, unique features of this journal: Ÿ manuscripts regarding research proposals and research ideas will be particularly welcomed Ÿ electronic files or software regarding the full details of the calculation and experimental procedure, if unable to be published in a normal way, can be deposited as supplementary material Ÿ we also accept manuscripts communicating to a broader audience with regard to research projects financed with public funds
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信