[Physician-led healthcare structures for patients in out-of-hospital intensive care nursing: a cross-sectional survey by the German Society for Out-of-Hospital Ventilation].

IF 0.6 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Donatha Hornemann, Bernd Schucher, Hakim Bayarassou, Christoph Jaschke, Georg Fabritius, Thomas Platz, Tobias Schmidt-Wilcke, Marcus Pohl, Martin Groß
{"title":"[Physician-led healthcare structures for patients in out-of-hospital intensive care nursing: a cross-sectional survey by the German Society for Out-of-Hospital Ventilation].","authors":"Donatha Hornemann, Bernd Schucher, Hakim Bayarassou, Christoph Jaschke, Georg Fabritius, Thomas Platz, Tobias Schmidt-Wilcke, Marcus Pohl, Martin Groß","doi":"10.1055/a-2415-8477","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients in out-of-hospital intensive care are usually provided with a tracheal cannula and often additionally receive mechanical ventilation. Less frequently, they receive non-invasive ventilation. Their potential to be weaned from the ventilator and to have their tracheostomy tubes removed must be evaluated twice per year from January 1, 2025 on. If there is a potential for weaning from mechanical ventilation or removal of the tracheostomy tube, referral to a specialized facility is required.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The study aimed at characterizing the specialized institutions which can evaluate the potential of patients to be weaned from the ventilator and to have their tracheostomy tubes removed, and which can perform these tasks as well.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Under the auspices of the German Interdisciplinary Society for Out-of-Hospital Ventilation (DIGAB) and with support from the Working group early neurological-neurosurgical rehabilitation (ENNR) a crosssectional online survey took place.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 18 participating institutions, 11 (61.1%) were certified by professional societies representing neurorehabilitation, respiratory medicine, anaesthesiology and intensive care or paraplegiology. Most leading physicians were specialists in neurology, followed by pulmonology, anaesthesiology and paediatrics. Many professions with a variety of qualifications worked in these institutions. According to n=10 (55.6%) of the participating instituions, regional treatment capacities for patients from out-of-hospital intensive care, who need hospital admission for weaning from mechanical ventilation or a tracheal cannula, were not sufficient. About one third of the institutions offered televisits.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Patients in out-of-hospital intensive care need interdisciplinary care, interconnecting out- and inpatient care structures due to medical complexity and participation restrictions. While interdisciplinary teams and a wide spectrum of diagnostic and therapeutic methods were provided in the participating institutions, their structure differed considerably.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Quality criteria should be established for centres evaluating the patients' potential to be weaned from the ventilator and to have their tracheostomy tubes removed and performing weaning from mechanical ventilation and tracheal cannulas. Further research is needed to specify those criteria, to quantify inpatient treatment capacities for patients from out-of-hospital intensive care to be weaned from mechanical ventilation or tracheal cannulas,to evaluate the feasibility of weaning from mechanical ventilation and tracheal cannulas in an out-of-hospital setting and to understand the role of telemedicine in the treatment of patients in out-of-hospital intensive care.</p>","PeriodicalId":12353,"journal":{"name":"Fortschritte Der Neurologie Psychiatrie","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fortschritte Der Neurologie Psychiatrie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2415-8477","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Patients in out-of-hospital intensive care are usually provided with a tracheal cannula and often additionally receive mechanical ventilation. Less frequently, they receive non-invasive ventilation. Their potential to be weaned from the ventilator and to have their tracheostomy tubes removed must be evaluated twice per year from January 1, 2025 on. If there is a potential for weaning from mechanical ventilation or removal of the tracheostomy tube, referral to a specialized facility is required.

Objective: The study aimed at characterizing the specialized institutions which can evaluate the potential of patients to be weaned from the ventilator and to have their tracheostomy tubes removed, and which can perform these tasks as well.

Methods: Under the auspices of the German Interdisciplinary Society for Out-of-Hospital Ventilation (DIGAB) and with support from the Working group early neurological-neurosurgical rehabilitation (ENNR) a crosssectional online survey took place.

Results: Of 18 participating institutions, 11 (61.1%) were certified by professional societies representing neurorehabilitation, respiratory medicine, anaesthesiology and intensive care or paraplegiology. Most leading physicians were specialists in neurology, followed by pulmonology, anaesthesiology and paediatrics. Many professions with a variety of qualifications worked in these institutions. According to n=10 (55.6%) of the participating instituions, regional treatment capacities for patients from out-of-hospital intensive care, who need hospital admission for weaning from mechanical ventilation or a tracheal cannula, were not sufficient. About one third of the institutions offered televisits.

Discussion: Patients in out-of-hospital intensive care need interdisciplinary care, interconnecting out- and inpatient care structures due to medical complexity and participation restrictions. While interdisciplinary teams and a wide spectrum of diagnostic and therapeutic methods were provided in the participating institutions, their structure differed considerably.

Conclusion: Quality criteria should be established for centres evaluating the patients' potential to be weaned from the ventilator and to have their tracheostomy tubes removed and performing weaning from mechanical ventilation and tracheal cannulas. Further research is needed to specify those criteria, to quantify inpatient treatment capacities for patients from out-of-hospital intensive care to be weaned from mechanical ventilation or tracheal cannulas,to evaluate the feasibility of weaning from mechanical ventilation and tracheal cannulas in an out-of-hospital setting and to understand the role of telemedicine in the treatment of patients in out-of-hospital intensive care.

[院外重症监护患者的医生主导医疗结构:德国院外通气协会的横断面调查]。
背景:院外重症监护室的患者通常都配有气管插管,而且通常还会接受机械通气。他们接受无创通气的情况较少。从 2025 年 1 月 1 日起,每年必须对患者断开呼吸机和拔除气管造口管的可能性进行两次评估。如果有可能脱离机械通气或拔除气管造口管,则必须转诊至专业机构:该研究旨在了解能够评估患者脱离呼吸机和拔除气管造口管的可能性,并能完成这些任务的专业机构的特点:在德国院外通气跨学科协会(DIGAB)的支持下,并在早期神经-神经外科康复工作组(ENNR)的支持下,进行了一次横断面在线调查:结果:在 18 家参与调查的机构中,有 11 家(61.1%)获得了神经康复、呼吸内科、麻醉科、重症监护或截瘫等专业协会的认证。大多数主要医生都是神经内科专家,其次是肺科、麻醉科和儿科。许多拥有各种资质的专业人员都在这些机构工作。据 10 家(55.6%)参与机构称,院外重症监护机构对需要入院断开机械通气或气管插管的患者的区域治疗能力不足。约有三分之一的机构提供了电视治疗:讨论:院外重症监护患者由于医疗复杂性和参与限制,需要跨学科护理,将院外和住院护理机构联系起来。虽然参与机构提供了跨学科团队和多种诊断与治疗方法,但其结构差异很大:结论:应该为评估患者是否有可能脱离呼吸机、拔除气管造口管、进行机械通气和气管插管断流的中心制定质量标准。我们需要进一步开展研究,以明确这些标准,量化院外重症监护患者断开机械通气或气管插管的住院治疗能力,评估在院外环境中断开机械通气和气管插管的可行性,并了解远程医疗在院外重症监护患者治疗中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
16.70%
发文量
139
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Fundiertes Wissen für den Berufsalltag Relevante Originalarbeiten Informative Übersichten zu wichtigen Themen Fortbildungsteil mit Zertifizierung – 36 CME-Punkte pro Jahr Interessante Kasuistiken Referiert & kommentiert: Internationale Studien Aktuelles zu Begutachtung und Neurobiologie International gelistet und häufig zitiert
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信