Population monitoring and conservation implications of intra- and interspecific nest occupation rates in swallows

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
José L. Tella, Cristina B. Sánchez-Prieto, Pedro Romero-Vidal, David Serrano, Guillermo Blanco
{"title":"Population monitoring and conservation implications of intra- and interspecific nest occupation rates in swallows","authors":"José L. Tella,&nbsp;Cristina B. Sánchez-Prieto,&nbsp;Pedro Romero-Vidal,&nbsp;David Serrano,&nbsp;Guillermo Blanco","doi":"10.1002/ece3.70205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>With the exception of a few groups of birds, such as large raptors and colonial seabirds, direct counts of nests cannot be conducted over very large areas for most of the abundant and widely distributed species, and thus indirect methods are used to estimate their relative abundances and population sizes. However, many species of the Family Hirundinidae (swallows and martins) build their mud nests in discrete, predictable and accessible sites, which are reused across years. Therefore, the direct count of active nests could constitute a reliable method for estimating breeding population sizes and their changes at large spatial and temporal scales. We illustrate the feasibility of this monitoring approach through a single year survey of &gt;2700 nests of three coexisting Old-World species, the barn swallow (<i>Hirundo rustica</i>), the red-rumped swallow (<i>Cecropis daurica</i>), and the crag martin (<i>Ptyonoprogne rupestris</i>), distributed across Portugal and Spain. Our results revealed changes in the use of nesting substrates and increases in interspecific nest usurpation rates over recent decades. While 56% of the nests of <i>C. daurica</i> were located in rocks five decades ago, almost 100% are nowadays located in anthropogenic substrates such as bridges, road culverts, and abandoned buildings, which could have favored the range expansion of this species. Nest occupation rates were surprisingly low (12% in <i>C. daurica</i>, 21% in <i>H. rustica</i>, and 37% in <i>P. rupestris</i>), and the proportion of abandoned nesting sites was very high (65% in <i>C. daurica</i>, 50% in <i>H. rustica</i>, and 27% in <i>P. rupestris</i>). Abandonment rates reflect the population decline reported for <i>H. rustica</i>. Notably, the usurpation of nests of <i>C. daurica</i> by house sparrows <i>Passer domesticus,</i> which is the main cause of breeding failure, has increased from 2.4% in 1976–1979 to 34.7% of the nests nowadays. The long-term monitoring of nests may constitute a reliable and affordable method, with the help of citizen science, for assessing changes in breeding population sizes and conservation threats of these and other mud-nest building hirundines worldwide.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11494152/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ece3.70205","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With the exception of a few groups of birds, such as large raptors and colonial seabirds, direct counts of nests cannot be conducted over very large areas for most of the abundant and widely distributed species, and thus indirect methods are used to estimate their relative abundances and population sizes. However, many species of the Family Hirundinidae (swallows and martins) build their mud nests in discrete, predictable and accessible sites, which are reused across years. Therefore, the direct count of active nests could constitute a reliable method for estimating breeding population sizes and their changes at large spatial and temporal scales. We illustrate the feasibility of this monitoring approach through a single year survey of >2700 nests of three coexisting Old-World species, the barn swallow (Hirundo rustica), the red-rumped swallow (Cecropis daurica), and the crag martin (Ptyonoprogne rupestris), distributed across Portugal and Spain. Our results revealed changes in the use of nesting substrates and increases in interspecific nest usurpation rates over recent decades. While 56% of the nests of C. daurica were located in rocks five decades ago, almost 100% are nowadays located in anthropogenic substrates such as bridges, road culverts, and abandoned buildings, which could have favored the range expansion of this species. Nest occupation rates were surprisingly low (12% in C. daurica, 21% in H. rustica, and 37% in P. rupestris), and the proportion of abandoned nesting sites was very high (65% in C. daurica, 50% in H. rustica, and 27% in P. rupestris). Abandonment rates reflect the population decline reported for H. rustica. Notably, the usurpation of nests of C. daurica by house sparrows Passer domesticus, which is the main cause of breeding failure, has increased from 2.4% in 1976–1979 to 34.7% of the nests nowadays. The long-term monitoring of nests may constitute a reliable and affordable method, with the help of citizen science, for assessing changes in breeding population sizes and conservation threats of these and other mud-nest building hirundines worldwide.

Abstract Image

燕子种内和种间巢占据率的种群监测和保护意义。
除大型猛禽和群居海鸟等少数鸟类外,对于大多数数量丰富且分布广泛的物种来说,无法在非常大的区域内对巢进行直接计数,因此只能采用间接方法来估算其相对数量和种群规模。然而,燕科(燕子和貂)的许多物种都在离散、可预测和可到达的地点筑泥巢,这些巢在不同年份重复使用。因此,直接计数活动巢穴是估算繁殖种群数量及其大时空尺度变化的可靠方法。我们通过对分布在葡萄牙和西班牙的谷仓燕(Hirundo rustica)、红腰燕(Cecropis daurica)和峭岩燕(Ptyonoprogne rupestris)这三种共存的旧大陆鸟类超过 2700 个巢进行一年的调查,说明了这种监测方法的可行性。我们的研究结果表明,近几十年来,筑巢基质的使用发生了变化,种间巢穴侵占率上升。五十年前,56%的C. daurica巢位于岩石中,而现在几乎100%的C. daurica巢位于人为基质中,如桥梁、道路涵洞和废弃建筑物,这可能有利于该物种的分布范围扩大。巢的占用率出奇地低(C. daurica为12%,H. rustica为21%,P. rupestris为37%),而弃巢的比例却非常高(C. daurica为65%,H. rustica为50%,P. rupestris为27%)。弃巢率反映了 H. rustica 的种群数量下降。值得注意的是,家雀侵占 C. daurica 的巢是繁殖失败的主要原因,侵占率从 1976-1979 年的 2.4% 上升到现在的 34.7%。在公民科学的帮助下,对巢穴的长期监测可能会成为一种可靠且经济实惠的方法,用于评估这些鸟类和世界上其他筑泥巢的鹭科鸟类繁殖种群数量的变化和面临的保护威胁。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信