Drivers of Wolf Activity in a Human-Dominated Landscape and Its Individual Variability Toward Anthropogenic Disturbance

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Iago Ferreiro-Arias, Emilio José García, Vicente Palacios, Víctor Sazatornil, Alejandro Rodríguez, José Vicente López-Bao, Luis Llaneza
{"title":"Drivers of Wolf Activity in a Human-Dominated Landscape and Its Individual Variability Toward Anthropogenic Disturbance","authors":"Iago Ferreiro-Arias,&nbsp;Emilio José García,&nbsp;Vicente Palacios,&nbsp;Víctor Sazatornil,&nbsp;Alejandro Rodríguez,&nbsp;José Vicente López-Bao,&nbsp;Luis Llaneza","doi":"10.1002/ece3.70397","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Wolves (<i>Canis lupus)</i> exhibit contrasted activity patterns along their distribution range. The shift from diurnal to nocturnal habits within and among populations appears to be primarily driven by localized levels of human activity, with ambivalent responses toward such disturbance reported among populations. Yet, the drivers and the underlying individual variability of temporal avoidance patterns toward human remains unexplored. We equipped 26 wolves with GPS–GSM collars, obtaining 54,721 locations. We used step lengths, turning angles, and accelerometer data from recorded locations to infer activity through hidden Markov models (Conners, M. G., T. Michelot, E. I. Heywood, et al. 2021. “Hidden Markov Models Identify Major Movement Modes in Accelerometer and Magnetometer Data From Four Albatross Species.” <i>Movement Ecology</i> 9, no. 1: 1–16.). We further explored the probability of activity as a function of a set of proxies of anthropogenic disturbance at different spatial scales and its interaction with different periods of the day by fitting population-level and individual-based hidden Markov models. Wolves were predominantly active during dusk and night, yet variations in activity emerged among individuals across day periods. We did not find clear population-level effects of anthropogenic disturbance predictors, as these were masked by a wide range of individual-specific responses, which varied from positive to negative, with inter-individual variability in responses changing according to different predictors and periods of the day. Our results suggest a non-uniform strategy of wolves in adapting their behavior to human-dominated environments, further underscoring the role of vegetation patches acting as functional refuge cover for buffering the effects of anthropogenic disturbance and boosting the persistence of the species in human-dominated landscapes. This study, for the first time, reveals the individual variability in wolf responses to human disturbance. By fitting hidden Markov models to data from GPS–GSM collars deployed on 26 wolves, we found significant variation between individuals in their responses to different levels of anthropogenic pressure and across different times of day, highlighting a non-uniform strategy for coping with perturbations in human-dominated landscapes. Our findings underscore the diverse behavioral adjustments employed by wolves to persist in these environments and highlight the critical importance of vegetation patches serving as refuge cover.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11494153/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ece3.70397","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Wolves (Canis lupus) exhibit contrasted activity patterns along their distribution range. The shift from diurnal to nocturnal habits within and among populations appears to be primarily driven by localized levels of human activity, with ambivalent responses toward such disturbance reported among populations. Yet, the drivers and the underlying individual variability of temporal avoidance patterns toward human remains unexplored. We equipped 26 wolves with GPS–GSM collars, obtaining 54,721 locations. We used step lengths, turning angles, and accelerometer data from recorded locations to infer activity through hidden Markov models (Conners, M. G., T. Michelot, E. I. Heywood, et al. 2021. “Hidden Markov Models Identify Major Movement Modes in Accelerometer and Magnetometer Data From Four Albatross Species.” Movement Ecology 9, no. 1: 1–16.). We further explored the probability of activity as a function of a set of proxies of anthropogenic disturbance at different spatial scales and its interaction with different periods of the day by fitting population-level and individual-based hidden Markov models. Wolves were predominantly active during dusk and night, yet variations in activity emerged among individuals across day periods. We did not find clear population-level effects of anthropogenic disturbance predictors, as these were masked by a wide range of individual-specific responses, which varied from positive to negative, with inter-individual variability in responses changing according to different predictors and periods of the day. Our results suggest a non-uniform strategy of wolves in adapting their behavior to human-dominated environments, further underscoring the role of vegetation patches acting as functional refuge cover for buffering the effects of anthropogenic disturbance and boosting the persistence of the species in human-dominated landscapes. This study, for the first time, reveals the individual variability in wolf responses to human disturbance. By fitting hidden Markov models to data from GPS–GSM collars deployed on 26 wolves, we found significant variation between individuals in their responses to different levels of anthropogenic pressure and across different times of day, highlighting a non-uniform strategy for coping with perturbations in human-dominated landscapes. Our findings underscore the diverse behavioral adjustments employed by wolves to persist in these environments and highlight the critical importance of vegetation patches serving as refuge cover.

Abstract Image

狼在人类占主导地位的景观中活动的驱动因素及其对人为干扰的个体差异性。
狼(Canis lupus)在其分布范围内表现出截然不同的活动模式。种群内部和种群之间从昼伏夜出到夜行习性的转变似乎主要是受局部人类活动水平的影响,据报道,种群之间对这种干扰的反应是矛盾的。然而,对人类的时间回避模式的驱动因素和潜在的个体差异仍有待探索。我们为 26 只狼配备了 GPS-GSM 项圈,获得了 54,721 个位置。我们使用记录位置的步长、转弯角度和加速度计数据,通过隐马尔可夫模型推断狼的活动(康纳斯、M. G.、T. 米歇尔特、E. I. 海伍德等,2021 年。"Hidden Markov Models Identify Major Movement Modes in Accelerometer and Magnetometer Data from Four Albatross Species." 运动生态学 9, no.运动生态学》第 9 期:1-16)。通过拟合种群水平和基于个体的隐马尔可夫模型,我们进一步探讨了活动概率与不同空间尺度上人为干扰的一组代用指标的函数关系,以及其与一天中不同时段的相互作用。狼群主要在黄昏和夜晚活动,但不同个体在不同时段的活动也有差异。我们没有发现人为干扰预测因子对种群水平的明显影响,因为这些影响被个体的广泛反应所掩盖,个体的反应从积极到消极不等,个体间的反应差异随不同的预测因子和一天中的不同时段而变化。我们的研究结果表明,狼在适应人类占主导地位的环境时采取了一种非统一的策略,这进一步强调了植被斑块作为功能性避难覆盖物在缓冲人为干扰影响和促进物种在人类占主导地位的景观中持续存在方面的作用。这项研究首次揭示了狼对人类干扰反应的个体差异性。通过对部署在26只狼身上的GPS-GSM项圈的数据进行隐马尔可夫模型拟合,我们发现不同个体对不同程度的人为压力和一天中不同时间段的反应存在显著差异,这凸显了狼在人类占主导地位的景观中应对干扰的非统一策略。我们的发现强调了狼为在这些环境中生存而采取的各种行为调整,并突出了植被斑块作为避难所的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信