Microneedling With Topical Insulin Versus Microneedling With Placebo in the Treatment of Postacne Atrophic Scars: A Randomized Control Trial.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 DERMATOLOGY
Rania Mounir Abdelhay, Manar Saeed Ali, Leila Zeiad Gad, Nahla Maher Mahran
{"title":"Microneedling With Topical Insulin Versus Microneedling With Placebo in the Treatment of Postacne Atrophic Scars: A Randomized Control Trial.","authors":"Rania Mounir Abdelhay, Manar Saeed Ali, Leila Zeiad Gad, Nahla Maher Mahran","doi":"10.1097/DSS.0000000000004462","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Among the treatment modalities for post-acne scars, microneedling is considered a safe and effective method.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the efficacy and safety of combined microneedling with topical insulin versus microneedling with placebo (topical saline) in treating atrophic acne scars.</p><p><strong>Methods and materials: </strong>Twenty-one patients with atrophic post-acne scars were randomized and treated in a split face manner with 4 sessions at 3-week intervals of microneedling using dermapen, followed by application of insulin on one side of the face and saline (placebo) on the other side. Evaluation of response was done before the sessions and after 1 month of the last session using the Global Scarring Grading System of Goodman & Baron and Lipper & Perez scores, Patient reported acne scar improvement using a 4-point scale, patient satisfaction, and the facial acne scar quality of life tools.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both therapeutic modalities yielded a statistically significant improvement of atrophic acne scars. By comparing both modalities, there was no statistical significance regarding clinical improvement and side effects.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Using topical insulin combined with microneedling may have a value in improving atrophic acne scars, suggesting further evaluation using different delivery systems, insulin formulations, and assessment modalities.</p>","PeriodicalId":11289,"journal":{"name":"Dermatologic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dermatologic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/DSS.0000000000004462","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Among the treatment modalities for post-acne scars, microneedling is considered a safe and effective method.

Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of combined microneedling with topical insulin versus microneedling with placebo (topical saline) in treating atrophic acne scars.

Methods and materials: Twenty-one patients with atrophic post-acne scars were randomized and treated in a split face manner with 4 sessions at 3-week intervals of microneedling using dermapen, followed by application of insulin on one side of the face and saline (placebo) on the other side. Evaluation of response was done before the sessions and after 1 month of the last session using the Global Scarring Grading System of Goodman & Baron and Lipper & Perez scores, Patient reported acne scar improvement using a 4-point scale, patient satisfaction, and the facial acne scar quality of life tools.

Results: Both therapeutic modalities yielded a statistically significant improvement of atrophic acne scars. By comparing both modalities, there was no statistical significance regarding clinical improvement and side effects.

Conclusion: Using topical insulin combined with microneedling may have a value in improving atrophic acne scars, suggesting further evaluation using different delivery systems, insulin formulations, and assessment modalities.

治疗痤疮后萎缩性疤痕的局部胰岛素微针疗法与安慰剂微针疗法:随机对照试验。
背景:在治疗痤疮后疤痕的方法中,微针疗法被认为是一种安全有效的方法:比较微针联合外用胰岛素与微针联合安慰剂(外用生理盐水)治疗萎缩性痤疮疤痕的有效性和安全性:21名萎缩性痤疮后疤痕患者被随机分为两组,每组4次,每次间隔3周,使用皮肤针进行微针治疗,然后一侧面部涂抹胰岛素,另一侧面部涂抹生理盐水(安慰剂)。在疗程前和最后一次疗程结束 1 个月后,使用 Goodman & Baron 的全球瘢痕分级系统和 Lipper & Perez 的评分标准对疗效进行评估,并使用 4 点量表对患者报告的痤疮疤痕改善情况、患者满意度和面部痤疮疤痕生活质量工具进行评估:结果:两种治疗方法都能显著改善萎缩性痤疮疤痕。结果:两种治疗方法对萎缩性痤疮疤痕的改善均有统计学意义,但两种治疗方法在临床改善和副作用方面的比较无统计学意义:结论:外用胰岛素结合微针疗法可能对改善萎缩性痤疮疤痕有一定价值,建议使用不同的给药系统、胰岛素配方和评估方式进行进一步评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Dermatologic Surgery
Dermatologic Surgery 医学-皮肤病学
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
16.70%
发文量
547
期刊介绍: Exclusively devoted to dermatologic surgery, the Dermatologic Surgery journal publishes the most clinically comprehensive and up-to-date information in its field. This unique monthly journal provides today’s most expansive and in-depth coverage of cosmetic and reconstructive skin surgery and skin cancer through peer-reviewed original articles, extensive illustrations, case reports, ongoing features, literature reviews and correspondence. The journal provides information on the latest scientific information for all types of dermatologic surgery including: -Ambulatory phlebectomy- Blepharoplasty- Body contouring- Chemical peels- Cryosurgery- Curettage and desiccation- Dermabrasion- Excision and closure- Flap Surgery- Grafting- Hair restoration surgery- Injectable neuromodulators- Laser surgery- Liposuction- Microdermabrasion- Microlipoinjection- Micropigmentation- Mohs micrographic surgery- Nail surgery- Phlebology- Sclerotherapy- Skin cancer surgery- Skin resurfacing- Soft-tissue fillers. Dermatologists, dermatologic surgeons, plastic surgeons, oculoplastic surgeons and facial plastic surgeons consider this a must-read publication for anyone in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信