The Relation of Diabetes Complications to a New Interpretation of Glycaemic Variability from Continuous Glucose Monitoring in People with Type 1 Diabetes.

IF 3.8 3区 医学 Q2 Medicine
Diabetes Therapy Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-23 DOI:10.1007/s13300-024-01648-w
Adrian H Heald, Mike Stedman, John Warner Levy, Lleyton Belston, Angela Paisley, Reena Patel, Alison White, Edward Jude, JMartin Gibson, Hellena Habte-Asres, Martin Whyte, Angus Forbes
{"title":"The Relation of Diabetes Complications to a New Interpretation of Glycaemic Variability from Continuous Glucose Monitoring in People with Type 1 Diabetes.","authors":"Adrian H Heald, Mike Stedman, John Warner Levy, Lleyton Belston, Angela Paisley, Reena Patel, Alison White, Edward Jude, JMartin Gibson, Hellena Habte-Asres, Martin Whyte, Angus Forbes","doi":"10.1007/s13300-024-01648-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Microvascular and macrovascular complications in type 1 diabetes (T1D) may be linked to endothelial stress due to glycaemic variability. Continuous glucose monitoring systems (CGMs) provide new opportunities to quantify this variability, utilising the amplitude of glucose change summated over time. The aim of this study was to examine whether this determination of glucose variability (GV) is associated with microvascular clinical sequelae.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Continuous glucose monitoring values were downloaded for 89 type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1D) individuals for up to 18 months from 2021 to 2023. Data for patient demographics was also taken from the patient record which included Sex, Date of Birth, and Date of Diagnosis. The recorded laboratory glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) test results were also recorded. The glucose management index (GMI) was calculated from average glucose readings for 18 months using the formula GMI (%) = (0.82-(Average glucose/100)). This was then adjusted to give GMI (mmol/mol) = 10.929 * (GMI (%) - 2.15). Average Glucose Fluctuation (AGF) was calculated by adding up the total absolute change value between all recorded results over 18 months and dividing by the number of results minus one. The % Above Critical Threshold (ACT) was calculated by summing the total number of occurrences for each result value. A cumulative 95% limit was then applied to identify the glucose value that only 5% of results exceeded in the overall population. Using this value, we estimated the percentage of total tests that were above the Critical Threshold (ACT).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results for the 89 individuals (44 men and 45 women) were analysed over 18 months. The mean age of participants was 43 years and the mean duration of diabetes was 18 years. A total of 3.22 million readings were analysed, giving an average of 10.3 mmol/L blood glucose. Those with the largest change in glucose from reading to reading, summated over time, showed the greatest change in eGFR of 3.12 ml/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup> (p = 0.007). People with a higher proportion of glucose readings > 18 mmol/L showed a fall in eGFR of 2.8 ml/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup> (p = 0.009) and experienced higher rates of sight-threatening retinopathy (44% of these individuals) (p = 0.01) as did 39% of individuals in the highest tertile of glucose levels (p = 0.008).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Those individuals with T1D in the highest tertile of reading-to-reading glucose change showed the greatest change in eGFR. Those with a higher proportion of glucose readings > 18 mmol/L also showed a fall in eGFR and experienced higher rates of sight-threatening retinopathy, as did people with higher mean glucose. Discussions with T1D individuals could reflect on how the percentage recorded glucose above a critical level and degree of change in glucose are important in avoiding future tissue complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":11192,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13300-024-01648-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Microvascular and macrovascular complications in type 1 diabetes (T1D) may be linked to endothelial stress due to glycaemic variability. Continuous glucose monitoring systems (CGMs) provide new opportunities to quantify this variability, utilising the amplitude of glucose change summated over time. The aim of this study was to examine whether this determination of glucose variability (GV) is associated with microvascular clinical sequelae.

Methods: Continuous glucose monitoring values were downloaded for 89 type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1D) individuals for up to 18 months from 2021 to 2023. Data for patient demographics was also taken from the patient record which included Sex, Date of Birth, and Date of Diagnosis. The recorded laboratory glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) test results were also recorded. The glucose management index (GMI) was calculated from average glucose readings for 18 months using the formula GMI (%) = (0.82-(Average glucose/100)). This was then adjusted to give GMI (mmol/mol) = 10.929 * (GMI (%) - 2.15). Average Glucose Fluctuation (AGF) was calculated by adding up the total absolute change value between all recorded results over 18 months and dividing by the number of results minus one. The % Above Critical Threshold (ACT) was calculated by summing the total number of occurrences for each result value. A cumulative 95% limit was then applied to identify the glucose value that only 5% of results exceeded in the overall population. Using this value, we estimated the percentage of total tests that were above the Critical Threshold (ACT).

Results: Results for the 89 individuals (44 men and 45 women) were analysed over 18 months. The mean age of participants was 43 years and the mean duration of diabetes was 18 years. A total of 3.22 million readings were analysed, giving an average of 10.3 mmol/L blood glucose. Those with the largest change in glucose from reading to reading, summated over time, showed the greatest change in eGFR of 3.12 ml/min/1.73 m2 (p = 0.007). People with a higher proportion of glucose readings > 18 mmol/L showed a fall in eGFR of 2.8 ml/min/1.73 m2 (p = 0.009) and experienced higher rates of sight-threatening retinopathy (44% of these individuals) (p = 0.01) as did 39% of individuals in the highest tertile of glucose levels (p = 0.008).

Conclusion: Those individuals with T1D in the highest tertile of reading-to-reading glucose change showed the greatest change in eGFR. Those with a higher proportion of glucose readings > 18 mmol/L also showed a fall in eGFR and experienced higher rates of sight-threatening retinopathy, as did people with higher mean glucose. Discussions with T1D individuals could reflect on how the percentage recorded glucose above a critical level and degree of change in glucose are important in avoiding future tissue complications.

糖尿病并发症与 1 型糖尿病患者连续血糖监测血糖变异性新解释的关系。
导言:1 型糖尿病(T1D)的微血管和大血管并发症可能与血糖变化引起的内皮压力有关。连续血糖监测系统(CGM)利用随时间累加的血糖变化幅度,为量化这种变异性提供了新的机会。本研究的目的是探讨这种葡萄糖变异性(GV)的测定是否与微血管临床后遗症有关:下载了 89 名 1 型糖尿病患者在 2021 年至 2023 年期间长达 18 个月的连续血糖监测值。患者人口统计学数据也来自患者记录,包括性别、出生日期和诊断日期。此外,还记录了实验室糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)检测结果。葡萄糖管理指数(GMI)是根据 18 个月的平均血糖读数计算得出的,计算公式为 GMI (%) = (0.82-(Average glucose/100)) 。然后进行调整,得出 GMI (mmol/mol) = 10.929 * (GMI (%) - 2.15)。平均血糖波动(AGF)的计算方法是将 18 个月内所有记录结果的绝对变化值相加,然后除以结果数减去 1。高于临界阈值百分比(ACT)的计算方法是将每个结果值的总出现次数相加。然后应用累计 95% 的限制来确定在总体中只有 5% 的结果超过的葡萄糖值。利用该值,我们估算出高于临界阈值(ACT)的检测结果占总检测结果的百分比:对 89 人(44 名男性和 45 名女性)18 个月的结果进行了分析。参与者的平均年龄为 43 岁,平均糖尿病病程为 18 年。共分析了 322 万个读数,平均血糖值为 10.3 mmol/L。血糖变化最大的人的 eGFR 变化最大,为 3.12 毫升/分钟/1.73 平方米(p = 0.007)。血糖读数大于 18 mmol/L 的患者比例较高,其 eGFR 下降了 2.8 毫升/分钟/1.73 平方米(p = 0.009),发生视力危及性视网膜病变的比例较高(占这些患者的 44%)(p = 0.01),血糖水平最高的三等分组中也有 39% 的患者发生了视力危及性视网膜病变(p = 0.008):结论:血糖读数变化最高的 T1D 患者的 eGFR 变化最大。血糖读数大于 18 毫摩尔/升的比例较高的 T1D 患者的 eGFR 也有所下降,发生危及视力的视网膜病变的比例也较高,平均血糖较高的患者也是如此。在与 T1D 患者进行讨论时,可以反思血糖记录超过临界水平的百分比和血糖变化程度对于避免未来组织并发症的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Diabetes Therapy
Diabetes Therapy Medicine-Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
7.90%
发文量
130
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Diabetes Therapy is an international, peer reviewed, rapid-publication (peer review in 2 weeks, published 3–4 weeks from acceptance) journal dedicated to the publication of high-quality clinical (all phases), observational, real-world, and health outcomes research around the discovery, development, and use of therapeutics and interventions (including devices) across all areas of diabetes. Studies relating to diagnostics and diagnosis, pharmacoeconomics, public health, epidemiology, quality of life, and patient care, management, and education are also encouraged. The journal is of interest to a broad audience of healthcare professionals and publishes original research, reviews, communications and letters. The journal is read by a global audience and receives submissions from all over the world. Diabetes Therapy will consider all scientifically sound research be it positive, confirmatory or negative data. Submissions are welcomed whether they relate to an international and/or a country-specific audience, something that is crucially important when researchers are trying to target more specific patient populations. This inclusive approach allows the journal to assist in the dissemination of all scientifically and ethically sound research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信