Defaunation impacts on the carbon balance of tropical forests.

IF 5.2 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Jedediah F Brodie, Carolina Bello, Carine Emer, Mauro Galetti, Matthew S Luskin, Anand Osuri, Carlos A Peres, Annina Stoll, Nacho Villar, Ana-Benítez López
{"title":"Defaunation impacts on the carbon balance of tropical forests.","authors":"Jedediah F Brodie, Carolina Bello, Carine Emer, Mauro Galetti, Matthew S Luskin, Anand Osuri, Carlos A Peres, Annina Stoll, Nacho Villar, Ana-Benítez López","doi":"10.1111/cobi.14414","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The urgent need to mitigate and adapt to climate change necessitates a comprehensive understanding of carbon cycling dynamics. Traditionally, global carbon cycle models have focused on vegetation, but recent research suggests that animals can play a significant role in carbon dynamics under some circumstances, potentially enhancing the effectiveness of nature-based solutions to mitigate climate change. However, links between animals, plants, and carbon remain unclear. We explored the complex interactions between defaunation and ecosystem carbon in Earth's most biodiverse and carbon-rich biome, tropical rainforests. Defaunation can change patterns of seed dispersal, granivory, and herbivory in ways that alter tree species composition and, therefore, forest carbon above- and belowground. Most studies we reviewed show that defaunation reduces carbon storage 0-26% in the Neo- and Afrotropics, primarily via population declines in large-seeded, animal-dispersed trees. However, Asian forests are not predicted to experience changes because their high-carbon trees are wind dispersed. Extrapolating these local effects to entire ecosystems implies losses of ∼1.6 Pg CO<sub>2</sub> equivalent across the Brazilian Atlantic Forest and 4-9.2 Pg across the Amazon over 100 years and of ∼14.7-26.3 Pg across the Congo basin over 250 years. In addition to being hard to quantify with precision, the effects of defaunation on ecosystem carbon are highly context dependent; outcomes varied based on the balance between antagonist and mutualist species interactions, abiotic conditions, human pressure, and numerous other factors. A combination of experiments, large-scale comparative studies, and mechanistic models could help disentangle the effects of defaunation from other anthropogenic forces in the face of the incredible complexity of tropical forest systems. Overall, our synthesis emphasizes the importance of-and inconsistent results when-integrating animal dynamics into carbon cycle models, which is crucial for developing climate change mitigation strategies and effective policies.</p>","PeriodicalId":10689,"journal":{"name":"Conservation Biology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Conservation Biology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.14414","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The urgent need to mitigate and adapt to climate change necessitates a comprehensive understanding of carbon cycling dynamics. Traditionally, global carbon cycle models have focused on vegetation, but recent research suggests that animals can play a significant role in carbon dynamics under some circumstances, potentially enhancing the effectiveness of nature-based solutions to mitigate climate change. However, links between animals, plants, and carbon remain unclear. We explored the complex interactions between defaunation and ecosystem carbon in Earth's most biodiverse and carbon-rich biome, tropical rainforests. Defaunation can change patterns of seed dispersal, granivory, and herbivory in ways that alter tree species composition and, therefore, forest carbon above- and belowground. Most studies we reviewed show that defaunation reduces carbon storage 0-26% in the Neo- and Afrotropics, primarily via population declines in large-seeded, animal-dispersed trees. However, Asian forests are not predicted to experience changes because their high-carbon trees are wind dispersed. Extrapolating these local effects to entire ecosystems implies losses of ∼1.6 Pg CO2 equivalent across the Brazilian Atlantic Forest and 4-9.2 Pg across the Amazon over 100 years and of ∼14.7-26.3 Pg across the Congo basin over 250 years. In addition to being hard to quantify with precision, the effects of defaunation on ecosystem carbon are highly context dependent; outcomes varied based on the balance between antagonist and mutualist species interactions, abiotic conditions, human pressure, and numerous other factors. A combination of experiments, large-scale comparative studies, and mechanistic models could help disentangle the effects of defaunation from other anthropogenic forces in the face of the incredible complexity of tropical forest systems. Overall, our synthesis emphasizes the importance of-and inconsistent results when-integrating animal dynamics into carbon cycle models, which is crucial for developing climate change mitigation strategies and effective policies.

荒漠化对热带森林碳平衡的影响。
减缓和适应气候变化的迫切需要要求全面了解碳循环动态。传统上,全球碳循环模型主要关注植被,但最近的研究表明,在某些情况下,动物在碳动力学中也能发挥重要作用,从而有可能提高基于自然的减缓气候变化解决方案的有效性。然而,动物、植物和碳之间的联系仍不清楚。我们探索了地球上生物多样性最丰富、碳含量最高的生物群落--热带雨林--中脱肥与生态系统碳之间复杂的相互作用。落叶现象会改变种子传播、食粒和食草模式,从而改变树种组成,进而改变森林地上和地下的碳。我们查阅的大多数研究表明,在新热带和非洲热带地区,落叶使碳储量减少了 0-26%,主要原因是大种子、动物散播树木的数量减少。然而,预计亚洲森林不会发生变化,因为它们的高碳树是随风分散的。将这些局部影响推断到整个生态系统,意味着巴西大西洋森林在 100 年内将损失 1.6 Pg CO2 当量,亚马逊森林在 100 年内将损失 4-9.2 Pg CO2 当量,刚果盆地在 250 年内将损失 14.7-26.3 Pg CO2 当量。除了难以精确量化之外,缺氧对生态系统碳的影响还高度依赖于具体环境;结果因拮抗物种和互惠物种之间的相互作用平衡、非生物条件、人类压力和许多其他因素而异。面对热带森林系统令人难以置信的复杂性,将实验、大规模比较研究和机理模型结合起来,有助于将碳脱失的影响与其他人为因素区分开来。总之,我们的综述强调了将动物动力学纳入碳循环模型的重要性和不一致的结果,这对制定气候变化减缓战略和有效政策至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Conservation Biology
Conservation Biology 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
3.20%
发文量
175
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Conservation Biology welcomes submissions that address the science and practice of conserving Earth's biological diversity. We encourage submissions that emphasize issues germane to any of Earth''s ecosystems or geographic regions and that apply diverse approaches to analyses and problem solving. Nevertheless, manuscripts with relevance to conservation that transcend the particular ecosystem, species, or situation described will be prioritized for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信