Safety and effectiveness of weighted blankets for symptom management in patients with mental disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

IF 4.3 3区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
Yanli Zhao , Qiushi Zhang , Zhihua Liu , Zhongjian Zhao , Qinghua Zhu
{"title":"Safety and effectiveness of weighted blankets for symptom management in patients with mental disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials","authors":"Yanli Zhao ,&nbsp;Qiushi Zhang ,&nbsp;Zhihua Liu ,&nbsp;Zhongjian Zhao ,&nbsp;Qinghua Zhu","doi":"10.1016/j.ctim.2024.103104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The current practice guideline regarding treatment for insomnia and sleep disturbances among children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) has been published and it suggests that the use of weighted blankets might not be an evidence-informed practice. However, limited guidance and evidence synthesis exist on the overall effectiveness of a weighted blanket for symptom management among patients with mental disorders, although it has been routinely recommended and prescribed for this population in many mental health care settings.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To systematically evaluate and synthesize existing data on the safety and effectiveness of weighted blankets for symptom management among patients with mental disorders.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Comprehensive retrieval of published, unpublished, or ongoing studies was carried out across a series of bibliographic databases, grey literature sources, and clinical trial registry platforms, along with manual screening of the reference lists of the included studies or relevant reviews. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included if they compared a weighted blanket intervention and a control condition among patients with mental disorders. Two reviewers independently extracted the data using a pre-specified form and assessed the methodological quality of the included studies with the revised Cochrane ‘Risk of Bias’ (RoB 2) tool. Review Manager (RevMan) 5.3 software was used to conduct the meta-analysis when possible. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses, where appropriate, were conducted to explore the robustness of the pooled effect estimates.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Eight studies involving a total of 426 patients were included in this review. Half of the included studies were rated as having a high risk of bias, primarily due to the failure to blind participants for participant-reported measures. No serious adverse events were reported with the application of weighted blankets. The meta-analysis of five studies revealed that the use of weighted blankets induced a small magnitude decrease (standardized mean difference within studies [SMD]= 0.40) in anxiety management. The pooled estimate of three studies reporting the effect of weighted blankets on insomnia revealed a nonsignificant difference between the two groups (mean difference [MD] = −1.92, 95 % confidence interval [CI] = −3.92–0.09, p = 0.06). However, the leave-one-out sensitivity analysis of the two remaining homogeneous studies revealed that patients who used weighted blankets had reduced insomnia severity index (ISI) scores (MD = −2.78, 95 % CI = −4.44 to −1.12, p = 0.001). Additionally, a study without available data for inclusion in the meta-analysis also reported a positive effect in reducing the ISI score. Due to the heterogeneity across studies, summary estimates for the effects of weighted blankets on fatigue and depression were not computed. However, primary studies reporting these two outcomes demonstrated that the application of weighted blankets had a positive effect.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Weighted blankets may be a safe and effective add-on treatment for managing common symptoms such as anxiety, insomnia, depression, and fatigue among psychiatric patients. However, these results need to be further confirmed due to the limited number of studies included in this review, the small sample size and the significant heterogeneity across these primary studies. To gain a better understanding of the effect and mechanism of weight blankets, future trials should preferably integrate more objective measures.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S096522992400092X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The current practice guideline regarding treatment for insomnia and sleep disturbances among children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) has been published and it suggests that the use of weighted blankets might not be an evidence-informed practice. However, limited guidance and evidence synthesis exist on the overall effectiveness of a weighted blanket for symptom management among patients with mental disorders, although it has been routinely recommended and prescribed for this population in many mental health care settings.

Objective

To systematically evaluate and synthesize existing data on the safety and effectiveness of weighted blankets for symptom management among patients with mental disorders.

Methods

Comprehensive retrieval of published, unpublished, or ongoing studies was carried out across a series of bibliographic databases, grey literature sources, and clinical trial registry platforms, along with manual screening of the reference lists of the included studies or relevant reviews. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included if they compared a weighted blanket intervention and a control condition among patients with mental disorders. Two reviewers independently extracted the data using a pre-specified form and assessed the methodological quality of the included studies with the revised Cochrane ‘Risk of Bias’ (RoB 2) tool. Review Manager (RevMan) 5.3 software was used to conduct the meta-analysis when possible. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses, where appropriate, were conducted to explore the robustness of the pooled effect estimates.

Results

Eight studies involving a total of 426 patients were included in this review. Half of the included studies were rated as having a high risk of bias, primarily due to the failure to blind participants for participant-reported measures. No serious adverse events were reported with the application of weighted blankets. The meta-analysis of five studies revealed that the use of weighted blankets induced a small magnitude decrease (standardized mean difference within studies [SMD]= 0.40) in anxiety management. The pooled estimate of three studies reporting the effect of weighted blankets on insomnia revealed a nonsignificant difference between the two groups (mean difference [MD] = −1.92, 95 % confidence interval [CI] = −3.92–0.09, p = 0.06). However, the leave-one-out sensitivity analysis of the two remaining homogeneous studies revealed that patients who used weighted blankets had reduced insomnia severity index (ISI) scores (MD = −2.78, 95 % CI = −4.44 to −1.12, p = 0.001). Additionally, a study without available data for inclusion in the meta-analysis also reported a positive effect in reducing the ISI score. Due to the heterogeneity across studies, summary estimates for the effects of weighted blankets on fatigue and depression were not computed. However, primary studies reporting these two outcomes demonstrated that the application of weighted blankets had a positive effect.

Conclusion

Weighted blankets may be a safe and effective add-on treatment for managing common symptoms such as anxiety, insomnia, depression, and fatigue among psychiatric patients. However, these results need to be further confirmed due to the limited number of studies included in this review, the small sample size and the significant heterogeneity across these primary studies. To gain a better understanding of the effect and mechanism of weight blankets, future trials should preferably integrate more objective measures.
用于精神障碍患者症状控制的负重毯的安全性和有效性:随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景:目前有关自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)儿童和青少年失眠和睡眠障碍治疗的实践指南已经发布,其中建议使用加重毯可能不是循证实践。然而,尽管在许多精神卫生保健机构中已对精神障碍患者常规推荐和处方使用负重毯,但关于负重毯对精神障碍患者症状控制的总体效果的指导和证据综述却很有限:系统评估并综合现有数据,说明在精神障碍患者中使用负重毯进行症状控制的安全性和有效性:在一系列书目数据库、灰色文献来源和临床试验登记平台上对已发表、未发表或正在进行的研究进行了全面检索,并对纳入研究或相关综述的参考文献列表进行了人工筛选。如果随机对照试验(RCT)对精神障碍患者中的加重毯干预措施和对照条件进行了比较,则纳入该试验。两名审稿人使用预先指定的表格独立提取数据,并使用修订版 Cochrane "偏倚风险"(RoB 2)工具评估纳入研究的方法学质量。在可能的情况下,使用 Review Manager (RevMan) 5.3 软件进行荟萃分析。在适当的情况下,还进行了分组分析和敏感性分析,以探讨汇总效应估计值的稳健性:本综述共纳入 8 项研究,涉及 426 名患者。所纳入的研究中有一半被评为偏倚风险较高,主要原因是未对参与者报告的测量结果设置盲法。没有关于使用负重毯发生严重不良事件的报告。对五项研究进行的荟萃分析表明,使用加权毯在焦虑管理方面有小幅下降(研究内标准化平均差 [SMD]= 0.40)。三项研究报告了负重毯对失眠症的影响,对这三项研究的汇总估计显示,两组之间的差异不显著(平均差 [MD] = -1.92, 95 % 置信区间 [CI] = -3.92-0.09,P = 0.06)。然而,对其余两项同质研究进行的剔除敏感性分析显示,使用加权毯的患者失眠严重程度指数(ISI)得分降低(MD = -2.78,95 % CI = -4.44 to -1.12,p = 0.001)。此外,一项没有数据可供纳入荟萃分析的研究也报告了降低 ISI 分数的积极效果。由于各研究之间存在异质性,因此没有计算加权毯对疲劳和抑郁影响的汇总估计值。不过,报告这两项结果的主要研究表明,使用负重毯具有积极的效果:结论:在控制精神病患者的焦虑、失眠、抑郁和疲劳等常见症状方面,负重毯可能是一种安全有效的附加治疗方法。然而,由于纳入本综述的研究数量有限、样本量较小以及这些主要研究之间存在显著的异质性,这些结果还需要进一步证实。为了更好地了解体重毯的效果和机制,未来的试验最好能纳入更多客观测量指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
567
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信