Diogo Pazzini Bomfim, Marco Alexandre Dias da Rocha, Adriana Sanudo, Edileia Bagatin
{"title":"A Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing Quality of Life in Adult Female Acne Treated with Azelaic Acid 15% Gel versus Oral Spironolactone.","authors":"Diogo Pazzini Bomfim, Marco Alexandre Dias da Rocha, Adriana Sanudo, Edileia Bagatin","doi":"10.2147/CCID.S463295","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In several countries, recent research has shown an increase in the prevalence of adult female acne (AFA), defined as the acne that appears in women aged over 25. This disease brings some particularities and challenges, such as a greater impact on quality of life (QoL) and chronicity. A negative impact on QoL has been observed, as well as anxiety, depression, anger, low self-esteem, and feelings of embarrassment and frustration.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To quantify AFA's impact on QoL and the influence of two dermatological treatments.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A prospective study including 40 women, aging from 25 to 44 years old, with mild-to-moderate acne was conducted. Participants underwent clinical, laboratory, and photographic evaluations. They were randomized into two treatment groups: group 1 - azelaic acid (AZA) 15% gel twice daily; group 2 - spironolactone (SPIRO) 100 mg/day and treated for 6 months. At baseline and at the end of treatments, a specific QoL questionnaire for acne, already translated and validated for Brazilian Portuguese (Acne-QoL-BR), was applied. It contains 19 questions allotted in four domains. Each item within a domain is scored from 0 to 6. The total score ranges from 0 to 114 and domains are distributed as follows: 0-30 (self-perception), 0-30 (role-emotional), 0-24 (role-social), 0-30 (acne-symptoms). Higher scores reflect better QoL.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age was 32.7 (SD: 5.42); 85% presented persistent acne. After treatment regardless of group, there was a significant improvement in total score and all domains' scores of acne QoL-BR (p < 0.001), with no difference between groups, despite one treatment being topical and the other systemic (p=0.918).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Acne-QoL-BR is a useful tool for quantifying the impact of acne and should be used as an efficacy parameter in clinical trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":10447,"journal":{"name":"Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11497079/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/CCID.S463295","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: In several countries, recent research has shown an increase in the prevalence of adult female acne (AFA), defined as the acne that appears in women aged over 25. This disease brings some particularities and challenges, such as a greater impact on quality of life (QoL) and chronicity. A negative impact on QoL has been observed, as well as anxiety, depression, anger, low self-esteem, and feelings of embarrassment and frustration.
Purpose: To quantify AFA's impact on QoL and the influence of two dermatological treatments.
Material and methods: A prospective study including 40 women, aging from 25 to 44 years old, with mild-to-moderate acne was conducted. Participants underwent clinical, laboratory, and photographic evaluations. They were randomized into two treatment groups: group 1 - azelaic acid (AZA) 15% gel twice daily; group 2 - spironolactone (SPIRO) 100 mg/day and treated for 6 months. At baseline and at the end of treatments, a specific QoL questionnaire for acne, already translated and validated for Brazilian Portuguese (Acne-QoL-BR), was applied. It contains 19 questions allotted in four domains. Each item within a domain is scored from 0 to 6. The total score ranges from 0 to 114 and domains are distributed as follows: 0-30 (self-perception), 0-30 (role-emotional), 0-24 (role-social), 0-30 (acne-symptoms). Higher scores reflect better QoL.
Results: The mean age was 32.7 (SD: 5.42); 85% presented persistent acne. After treatment regardless of group, there was a significant improvement in total score and all domains' scores of acne QoL-BR (p < 0.001), with no difference between groups, despite one treatment being topical and the other systemic (p=0.918).
Conclusion: Acne-QoL-BR is a useful tool for quantifying the impact of acne and should be used as an efficacy parameter in clinical trials.
期刊介绍：
Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal that focuses on the latest clinical and experimental research in all aspects of skin disease and cosmetic interventions. Normal and pathological processes in skin development and aging, their modification and treatment, as well as basic research into histology of dermal and dermal structures that provide clinical insights and potential treatment options are key topics for the journal.
Patient satisfaction, preference, quality of life, compliance, persistence and their role in developing new management options to optimize outcomes for target conditions constitute major areas of interest.
The journal is characterized by the rapid reporting of clinical studies, reviews and original research in skin research and skin care.
All areas of dermatology will be covered; contributions will be welcomed from all clinicians and basic science researchers globally.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
