Clinical characteristics and outcomes of orbital fractures: a sex-based cohort analysis.

IF 3.3 4区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Jobanpreet Dhillon, Iman Yusuf, Judy Gaffar, Zukhra Turakulova, Harrish Nithianandan, Matthew Kondoff, Michael Ross, Edsel Ing, Jean Deschenes, Georges Nassrallah
{"title":"Clinical characteristics and outcomes of orbital fractures: a sex-based cohort analysis.","authors":"Jobanpreet Dhillon, Iman Yusuf, Judy Gaffar, Zukhra Turakulova, Harrish Nithianandan, Matthew Kondoff, Michael Ross, Edsel Ing, Jean Deschenes, Georges Nassrallah","doi":"10.1016/j.jcjo.2024.10.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aims to identify clinical similarities and differences between males and females presenting with orbital fracture.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patient charts of adult orbital fracture cases diagnosed via computed tomography and referred by a level 1 trauma center to the McGill University Health Centre between August 2015 to January 2018 were examined and analyzed. Clinical parameters included age, sex, mechanism of injury, morphology of orbital fracture, symptoms and examination features, and rates of ocular pathology. Comparative analyses were performed via Student's t-test and chi-square to assess for sex-related differences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 176 males (mean age: 46.2 years) and 68 females (mean age: 58.5 years). The most common etiology of orbital fracture was assault among males (32%) and fall from own or standing height among females (38%). Males had a higher prevalence of bilateral fractures than females (17% vs 6%; p = 0.02) and had more orbital walls fractured per orbit than females (2.0 vs 1.5; p < 0.01). Males were more likely to have their orbital roof fractured (28% vs 15%; p = 0.03) and were more likely to be intubated after their trauma (22% vs 7%; p = 0.004). Post-traumatic ocular pathology occurred in 11% of males versus 9% of females (p = 0.56).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In our cohort of adult orbital fractures, males were more prevalent, more likely to have bilateral fractures, more extensive fracture per orbit, and higher prevalence of orbital roof fractures and intubation. Despite these differences, rates of ocular pathology did not differ significantly between males and females, highlighting the importance of a careful assessment in both groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":9606,"journal":{"name":"Canadian journal of ophthalmology. Journal canadien d'ophtalmologie","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian journal of ophthalmology. Journal canadien d'ophtalmologie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcjo.2024.10.004","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to identify clinical similarities and differences between males and females presenting with orbital fracture.

Methods: Patient charts of adult orbital fracture cases diagnosed via computed tomography and referred by a level 1 trauma center to the McGill University Health Centre between August 2015 to January 2018 were examined and analyzed. Clinical parameters included age, sex, mechanism of injury, morphology of orbital fracture, symptoms and examination features, and rates of ocular pathology. Comparative analyses were performed via Student's t-test and chi-square to assess for sex-related differences.

Results: The study included 176 males (mean age: 46.2 years) and 68 females (mean age: 58.5 years). The most common etiology of orbital fracture was assault among males (32%) and fall from own or standing height among females (38%). Males had a higher prevalence of bilateral fractures than females (17% vs 6%; p = 0.02) and had more orbital walls fractured per orbit than females (2.0 vs 1.5; p < 0.01). Males were more likely to have their orbital roof fractured (28% vs 15%; p = 0.03) and were more likely to be intubated after their trauma (22% vs 7%; p = 0.004). Post-traumatic ocular pathology occurred in 11% of males versus 9% of females (p = 0.56).

Conclusion: In our cohort of adult orbital fractures, males were more prevalent, more likely to have bilateral fractures, more extensive fracture per orbit, and higher prevalence of orbital roof fractures and intubation. Despite these differences, rates of ocular pathology did not differ significantly between males and females, highlighting the importance of a careful assessment in both groups.

眼眶骨折的临床特征和预后:基于性别的队列分析。
目的:本研究旨在确定男性和女性眼眶骨折患者的临床异同:研究人员对2015年8月至2018年1月期间通过计算机断层扫描确诊并由一级创伤中心转诊至麦吉尔大学健康中心的成人眼眶骨折病例的病历进行了检查和分析。临床参数包括年龄、性别、受伤机制、眼眶骨折形态、症状和检查特征以及眼部病变发生率。通过学生 t 检验和卡方检验进行比较分析,以评估与性别有关的差异:研究包括 176 名男性(平均年龄 46.2 岁)和 68 名女性(平均年龄 58.5 岁)。男性最常见的眼眶骨折病因是袭击(32%),女性则是从自身或站立高度跌落(38%)。与女性相比,男性双侧骨折的发生率更高(17% 对 6%;P = 0.02),每个眼眶骨折的眶壁也比女性多(2.0 对 1.5;P < 0.01)。男性眶顶骨折的几率更高(28% 对 15%;P = 0.03),外伤后插管的几率更高(22% 对 7%;P = 0.004)。11%的男性和9%的女性在创伤后出现眼部病变(P = 0.56):结论:在我们的成人眼眶骨折队列中,男性发病率更高,双侧骨折的可能性更大,每个眼眶的骨折范围更广,眶顶骨折和插管的发生率更高。尽管存在这些差异,但男性和女性的眼部病变发生率并无明显不同,这突出表明了对这两组患者进行仔细评估的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
4.80%
发文量
223
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Official journal of the Canadian Ophthalmological Society. The Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology (CJO) is the official journal of the Canadian Ophthalmological Society and is committed to timely publication of original, peer-reviewed ophthalmology and vision science articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信