Differentiation of pathological subtypes and Ki-67 and TTF-1 expression by dual-energy CT (DECT) volumetric quantitative analysis in non-small cell lung cancer.

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Yuting Wu, Jingxu Li, Li Ding, Jianbin Huang, Mingwang Chen, Xiaomei Li, Xiang Qin, Lisheng Huang, Zhao Chen, Yikai Xu, Chenggong Yan
{"title":"Differentiation of pathological subtypes and Ki-67 and TTF-1 expression by dual-energy CT (DECT) volumetric quantitative analysis in non-small cell lung cancer.","authors":"Yuting Wu, Jingxu Li, Li Ding, Jianbin Huang, Mingwang Chen, Xiaomei Li, Xiang Qin, Lisheng Huang, Zhao Chen, Yikai Xu, Chenggong Yan","doi":"10.1186/s40644-024-00793-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To explore the value of dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) in differentiating pathological subtypes and the expression of immunohistochemical markers Ki-67 and thyroid transcription factor 1 (TTF-1) in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between July 2022 and May 2024, patients suspected of lung cancer who underwent two-phase contrast-enhanced DECT were prospectively recruited. Whole-tumor volumetric and conventional spectral analysis were utilized to measure DECT parameters in the arterial and venous phase. The DECT parameters model, clinical-CT radiological features model, and combined prediction model were developed to discriminate pathological subtypes and predict Ki-67 or TTF-1 expression. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify independent predictors. The diagnostic efficacy was assessed by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and compared using DeLong's test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study included 119 patients (92 males and 27 females; mean age, 63.0 ± 9.4 years) who was diagnosed with NSCLC. When applying the DECT parameters model to differentiate between adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma, ROC curve analysis indicated superior diagnostic performance for conventional spectral analysis over volumetric spectral analysis (AUC, 0.801 vs. 0.709). Volumetric spectral analysis exhibited higher diagnostic efficacy in predicting immunohistochemical markers compared to conventional spectral analysis (both P < 0.05). For Ki-67 and TTF-1 expression, the combined prediction model demonstrated optimal diagnostic performance with AUC of 0.943 and 0.967, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The combined predictive model based on volumetric quantitative analysis in DECT offers valuable information to discriminate immunohistochemical expression status, facilitating clinical decision-making for patients with NSCLC.</p>","PeriodicalId":9548,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Imaging","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11515807/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40644-024-00793-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: To explore the value of dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) in differentiating pathological subtypes and the expression of immunohistochemical markers Ki-67 and thyroid transcription factor 1 (TTF-1) in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods: Between July 2022 and May 2024, patients suspected of lung cancer who underwent two-phase contrast-enhanced DECT were prospectively recruited. Whole-tumor volumetric and conventional spectral analysis were utilized to measure DECT parameters in the arterial and venous phase. The DECT parameters model, clinical-CT radiological features model, and combined prediction model were developed to discriminate pathological subtypes and predict Ki-67 or TTF-1 expression. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify independent predictors. The diagnostic efficacy was assessed by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and compared using DeLong's test.

Results: This study included 119 patients (92 males and 27 females; mean age, 63.0 ± 9.4 years) who was diagnosed with NSCLC. When applying the DECT parameters model to differentiate between adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma, ROC curve analysis indicated superior diagnostic performance for conventional spectral analysis over volumetric spectral analysis (AUC, 0.801 vs. 0.709). Volumetric spectral analysis exhibited higher diagnostic efficacy in predicting immunohistochemical markers compared to conventional spectral analysis (both P < 0.05). For Ki-67 and TTF-1 expression, the combined prediction model demonstrated optimal diagnostic performance with AUC of 0.943 and 0.967, respectively.

Conclusions: The combined predictive model based on volumetric quantitative analysis in DECT offers valuable information to discriminate immunohistochemical expression status, facilitating clinical decision-making for patients with NSCLC.

通过双能 CT(DECT)容积定量分析区分非小细胞肺癌的病理亚型及 Ki-67 和 TTF-1 表达。
研究背景目的:探讨双能计算机断层扫描(DECT)在区分非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者病理亚型以及免疫组化标志物Ki-67和甲状腺转录因子1(TTF-1)表达方面的价值:在2022年7月至2024年5月期间,前瞻性地招募了接受两相对比增强DECT检查的肺癌疑似患者。利用全肿瘤容积分析和常规频谱分析测量动脉期和静脉期的 DECT 参数。建立了DECT参数模型、临床-CT放射学特征模型和综合预测模型,以区分病理亚型并预测Ki-67或TTF-1的表达。多变量逻辑回归分析用于确定独立的预测因素。诊断效果通过接收者操作特征曲线下面积(AUC)进行评估,并使用 DeLong 检验进行比较:本研究共纳入 119 名确诊为 NSCLC 的患者(男性 92 人,女性 27 人;平均年龄(63.0±9.4)岁)。当应用 DECT 参数模型区分腺癌和鳞癌时,ROC 曲线分析表明传统光谱分析的诊断性能优于容积光谱分析(AUC,0.801 对 0.709)。与传统光谱分析相比,容积光谱分析在预测免疫组化标记物方面表现出更高的诊断效果(均为 P 结论):基于 DECT 容量定量分析的联合预测模型为鉴别免疫组化表达状态提供了有价值的信息,有助于 NSCLC 患者的临床决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cancer Imaging
Cancer Imaging ONCOLOGY-RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
66
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Cancer Imaging is an open access, peer-reviewed journal publishing original articles, reviews and editorials written by expert international radiologists working in oncology. The journal encompasses CT, MR, PET, ultrasound, radionuclide and multimodal imaging in all kinds of malignant tumours, plus new developments, techniques and innovations. Topics of interest include: Breast Imaging Chest Complications of treatment Ear, Nose & Throat Gastrointestinal Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Imaging biomarkers Interventional Lymphoma Measurement of tumour response Molecular functional imaging Musculoskeletal Neuro oncology Nuclear Medicine Paediatric.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信