Behaviour of motorcyclists and bicyclists before and after a road safety campaign, China.

IF 8.4 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Bulletin of the World Health Organization Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-25 DOI:10.2471/BLT.24.291524
Peishan Ning, Ruisha Peng, Huiying Zong, David C Schwebel, Cifu Xie, Jieyi He, Peixia Cheng, Li Li, Zhenzhen Rao, Guoqing Hu
{"title":"Behaviour of motorcyclists and bicyclists before and after a road safety campaign, China.","authors":"Peishan Ning, Ruisha Peng, Huiying Zong, David C Schwebel, Cifu Xie, Jieyi He, Peixia Cheng, Li Li, Zhenzhen Rao, Guoqing Hu","doi":"10.2471/BLT.24.291524","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine changes in red-light running and distracted riding among motorcyclists and cyclists before and after the 2020 implementation of the One Helmet, One Seatbelt campaign in China.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We obtained 192 hours of film before (2019) and after (2021) implementation of the campaign in eight road intersections in Changsha. We calculated percentages and ratios of red-light running and distracted riding. To assess the associations between these traffic behaviours and the campaign, we used multivariable logistic regression models to calculate adjusted odds ratios (aOR).</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>We filmed 5256 motorcyclists and cyclists in 2019 and 6269 in 2021. Red-light running decreased from 45.1% to 41.5% during this period (ratio: 0.92; 95% confidence interval, CI: 0.88-0.96), while distracted riding increased from 3.5% to 5.0% (ratio: 1.42; 95% CI: 1.19-1.69). After adjusting for covariates, male riders were more likely to run a red light compared to female riders (aOR: 1.28; 95% CI: 1.06-1.55). Red-light running was also more likely among electric bicycle riders (aOR: 1.46; 95% CI: 1.10-1.95) and motorcyclists (aOR: 1.47; 95% CI: 1.13-1.90) compared to traditional cyclists. All types of riders were less prone to run a red light during peak hours than off-peak hours (aOR: 0.85; 95% CI: 0.73-0.99). Distracted riding was more common on weekends compared to weekdays (aOR: 3.01; 95% CI: 2.02-4.49).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>China's national road safety campaign, which focuses on helmet and seatbelt use, was associated with reduced red-light running. Strict enforcement and targeted modifications could improve the campaign's effectiveness.</p>","PeriodicalId":9465,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of the World Health Organization","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11500252/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of the World Health Organization","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.24.291524","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To examine changes in red-light running and distracted riding among motorcyclists and cyclists before and after the 2020 implementation of the One Helmet, One Seatbelt campaign in China.

Methods: We obtained 192 hours of film before (2019) and after (2021) implementation of the campaign in eight road intersections in Changsha. We calculated percentages and ratios of red-light running and distracted riding. To assess the associations between these traffic behaviours and the campaign, we used multivariable logistic regression models to calculate adjusted odds ratios (aOR).

Findings: We filmed 5256 motorcyclists and cyclists in 2019 and 6269 in 2021. Red-light running decreased from 45.1% to 41.5% during this period (ratio: 0.92; 95% confidence interval, CI: 0.88-0.96), while distracted riding increased from 3.5% to 5.0% (ratio: 1.42; 95% CI: 1.19-1.69). After adjusting for covariates, male riders were more likely to run a red light compared to female riders (aOR: 1.28; 95% CI: 1.06-1.55). Red-light running was also more likely among electric bicycle riders (aOR: 1.46; 95% CI: 1.10-1.95) and motorcyclists (aOR: 1.47; 95% CI: 1.13-1.90) compared to traditional cyclists. All types of riders were less prone to run a red light during peak hours than off-peak hours (aOR: 0.85; 95% CI: 0.73-0.99). Distracted riding was more common on weekends compared to weekdays (aOR: 3.01; 95% CI: 2.02-4.49).

Conclusion: China's national road safety campaign, which focuses on helmet and seatbelt use, was associated with reduced red-light running. Strict enforcement and targeted modifications could improve the campaign's effectiveness.

中国道路安全运动前后摩托车手和自行车手的行为。
目的研究中国在 2020 年实施 "一个头盔,一条安全带 "运动前后,摩托车驾驶员和自行车驾驶员闯红灯和分心骑行的变化情况:方法:我们在长沙的八个路口获得了 192 个小时的影片,分别记录了活动实施前(2019 年)和实施后(2021 年)的情况。我们计算了闯红灯和分心骑行的百分比和比率。为了评估这些交通行为与宣传活动之间的关联,我们使用了多变量逻辑回归模型来计算调整后的几率比(aOR):我们在 2019 年拍摄了 5256 名摩托车手和自行车手,在 2021 年拍摄了 6269 名。在此期间,闯红灯的比例从 45.1%降至 41.5%(比率:0.92;95% 置信区间:0.88-0.96),而分心骑行的比例从 3.5%增至 5.0%(比率:1.42;95% 置信区间:1.19-1.69)。在对协变量进行调整后,男性骑行者比女性骑行者更容易闯红灯(aOR:1.28;95% CI:1.06-1.55)。与传统自行车骑行者相比,电动自行车骑行者(aOR:1.46;95% CI:1.10-1.95)和摩托车骑行者(aOR:1.47;95% CI:1.13-1.90)也更容易闯红灯。与非高峰时段相比,所有类型的骑行者在高峰时段闯红灯的概率都较低(aOR:0.85;95% CI:0.73-0.99)。与工作日相比,周末分心骑行的情况更为普遍(aOR:3.01;95% CI:2.02-4.49):结论:中国的全国道路安全运动侧重于头盔和安全带的使用,这与闯红灯现象的减少有关。严格执法和有针对性的修改可以提高活动的效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Bulletin of the World Health Organization
Bulletin of the World Health Organization 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
11.50
自引率
0.90%
发文量
317
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Bulletin of the World Health Organization Journal Overview: Leading public health journal Peer-reviewed monthly journal Special focus on developing countries Global scope and authority Top public and environmental health journal Impact factor of 6.818 (2018), according to Web of Science ranking Audience: Essential reading for public health decision-makers and researchers Provides blend of research, well-informed opinion, and news
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信