Early adoption of triamcinolone acetonide suprachoroidal injection for uveitic macular edema: a physician survey.

IF 1.6 Q2 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Christopher R Henry, Scott D Walter, Peter Y Chang, David J Warrow, Parisa Emami Naeini, Kevin J Blinder, Teresa Brevetti, Mohamed Yassine, Mark S Dacey, David S Chu, Veena R Raiji, Lana M Rifkin, Milan Shah, Michael A Singer
{"title":"Early adoption of triamcinolone acetonide suprachoroidal injection for uveitic macular edema: a physician survey.","authors":"Christopher R Henry, Scott D Walter, Peter Y Chang, David J Warrow, Parisa Emami Naeini, Kevin J Blinder, Teresa Brevetti, Mohamed Yassine, Mark S Dacey, David S Chu, Veena R Raiji, Lana M Rifkin, Milan Shah, Michael A Singer","doi":"10.1186/s13104-024-06969-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To obtain physicians' \"real-world\" perspectives on early experiences with triamcinolone acetonide suprachoroidal injection (SCS-TA) for treatment of patients with uveitic macular edema (UME).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twelve retina/uveitis specialists in the United States were surveyed about SCS-TA injection procedure and patient outcomes. Survey participants administered ≥ 291 SCS-TA injections to 243 patients with UME with various disease characteristics (etiologies, chronicity, and anatomical subtypes). Commonly reported reasons for SCS-TA adoption included potential for lowering the risk of steroid-associated intraocular pressure elevations versus intravitreal injections or implants (100%), potential for longer duration of action versus intravitreal steroid injections or implants (92%), and desire to use a new delivery modality (83%). Nearly all participants (92%) found injection procedure relatively easy post-training, with most (75%) procedurally comfortable after completing 2-5 injections. 58% of participants indicated that their patients gained 2-3 lines of vision by first follow-up visit, and 92% reported having patients who experienced 100-150 μm or greater reduction in central subfield thickness. Overall, 92% of participants were satisfied with SCS-TA treatment outcomes. Findings from this survey of early adopters of SCS-TA indicate that the suprachoroidal injection technique was easy to learn and resulted in favorable patient outcomes consistent with clinical trial data.</p>","PeriodicalId":9234,"journal":{"name":"BMC Research Notes","volume":"17 1","pages":"317"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11515593/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Research Notes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-024-06969-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To obtain physicians' "real-world" perspectives on early experiences with triamcinolone acetonide suprachoroidal injection (SCS-TA) for treatment of patients with uveitic macular edema (UME).

Results: Twelve retina/uveitis specialists in the United States were surveyed about SCS-TA injection procedure and patient outcomes. Survey participants administered ≥ 291 SCS-TA injections to 243 patients with UME with various disease characteristics (etiologies, chronicity, and anatomical subtypes). Commonly reported reasons for SCS-TA adoption included potential for lowering the risk of steroid-associated intraocular pressure elevations versus intravitreal injections or implants (100%), potential for longer duration of action versus intravitreal steroid injections or implants (92%), and desire to use a new delivery modality (83%). Nearly all participants (92%) found injection procedure relatively easy post-training, with most (75%) procedurally comfortable after completing 2-5 injections. 58% of participants indicated that their patients gained 2-3 lines of vision by first follow-up visit, and 92% reported having patients who experienced 100-150 μm or greater reduction in central subfield thickness. Overall, 92% of participants were satisfied with SCS-TA treatment outcomes. Findings from this survey of early adopters of SCS-TA indicate that the suprachoroidal injection technique was easy to learn and resulted in favorable patient outcomes consistent with clinical trial data.

医生调查:早期采用曲安奈德类药物脉络膜上注射治疗葡萄膜炎性黄斑水肿。
目的了解医生对使用曲安奈德-醋酸曲安奈德脉络膜上注射液(SCS-TA)治疗葡萄膜炎性黄斑水肿(UME)患者的早期经验的 "真实世界 "观点:对美国的 12 位视网膜/葡萄膜炎专科医生进行了有关 SCS-TA 注射程序和患者疗效的调查。参与调查者为 243 名 UME 患者进行了≥ 291 次 SCS-TA 注射,这些患者的疾病特征(病因、慢性程度和解剖亚型)各不相同。采用 SCS-TA 的常见原因包括:与玻璃体内注射或植入相比,SCS-TA 有可能降低类固醇相关眼压升高的风险(100%);与玻璃体内类固醇注射或植入相比,SCS-TA 有可能延长作用时间(92%);以及希望使用一种新的给药方式(83%)。几乎所有参与者(92%)都认为培训后的注射过程相对简单,其中大多数人(75%)在完成 2-5 次注射后就能适应注射过程。58% 的参与者表示,他们的患者在首次复诊时视力提高了 2-3 行,92% 的参与者表示,他们的患者的中央视场下厚度减少了 100-150 μm 或更多。总体而言,92% 的参与者对 SCS-TA 的治疗效果表示满意。这项针对 SCS-TA 早期使用者的调查结果表明,脉络膜上腔注射技术简单易学,为患者带来的良好疗效与临床试验数据一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Research Notes
BMC Research Notes Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (all)
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
363
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Research Notes publishes scientifically valid research outputs that cannot be considered as full research or methodology articles. We support the research community across all scientific and clinical disciplines by providing an open access forum for sharing data and useful information; this includes, but is not limited to, updates to previous work, additions to established methods, short publications, null results, research proposals and data management plans.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信