Sociodemographic differences in low back pain: which subgroups of workers are most vulnerable?

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Johannes Beller, Stefanie Sperlich, Jelena Epping, Batoul Safieddine, Janice Hegewald, Juliane Tetzlaff
{"title":"Sociodemographic differences in low back pain: which subgroups of workers are most vulnerable?","authors":"Johannes Beller, Stefanie Sperlich, Jelena Epping, Batoul Safieddine, Janice Hegewald, Juliane Tetzlaff","doi":"10.1186/s12891-024-07970-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Low back pain (LBP) is a common health problem in workers that contributes to work disability and reduces quality of life. However, studies examining vulnerable groups in relation to sociodemographic differences in LBP remain scarce. Therefore, the current study investigates which sociodemographic groups of workers are most affected by LBP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from the 2018 BIBB/BAuA employment survey were used (N = 16252). Age, education, occupational group, income, working hours, atypical working time, relationship status, and having children were used as sociodemographic predictors. Gender-stratified logistic regression analyses and intersectional classification tree analyses were conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A higher prevalence of LBP was observed for women compared to men. Significant differences in LBP emerged for age, working hours, atypical working time, occupational group and education, with some gender differences in the importance of predictors: Age was a significant predictor mostly in men as compared to women, atypical working hours had a slightly greater effect in women, whereas differences in LBP according to the occupational group were more pronounced for men. Vulnerable groups were found to be women who work in occupations other than professionals or managers, work atypical hours and have an intermediate or low educational level as well as men who work as skilled agricultural workers, craft workers, machine operators, or elementary occupations and are between 35 and 64 years old.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Thus, workers with certain occupations and lower levels of education, middle-aged men and women with unfavourable working time characteristics are most affected by low back pain. These groups should be focused on to potentially increase healthy working life and prevent work disability.</p>","PeriodicalId":9189,"journal":{"name":"BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11515217/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-024-07970-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Low back pain (LBP) is a common health problem in workers that contributes to work disability and reduces quality of life. However, studies examining vulnerable groups in relation to sociodemographic differences in LBP remain scarce. Therefore, the current study investigates which sociodemographic groups of workers are most affected by LBP.

Methods: Data from the 2018 BIBB/BAuA employment survey were used (N = 16252). Age, education, occupational group, income, working hours, atypical working time, relationship status, and having children were used as sociodemographic predictors. Gender-stratified logistic regression analyses and intersectional classification tree analyses were conducted.

Results: A higher prevalence of LBP was observed for women compared to men. Significant differences in LBP emerged for age, working hours, atypical working time, occupational group and education, with some gender differences in the importance of predictors: Age was a significant predictor mostly in men as compared to women, atypical working hours had a slightly greater effect in women, whereas differences in LBP according to the occupational group were more pronounced for men. Vulnerable groups were found to be women who work in occupations other than professionals or managers, work atypical hours and have an intermediate or low educational level as well as men who work as skilled agricultural workers, craft workers, machine operators, or elementary occupations and are between 35 and 64 years old.

Conclusions: Thus, workers with certain occupations and lower levels of education, middle-aged men and women with unfavourable working time characteristics are most affected by low back pain. These groups should be focused on to potentially increase healthy working life and prevent work disability.

腰背痛的社会人口学差异:哪些工人亚群最易受伤害?
背景:腰背痛(LBP)是工人常见的健康问题,会导致工作残疾并降低生活质量。然而,针对腰背痛与社会人口学差异相关的弱势群体的研究仍然很少。因此,本研究调查了哪些工人社会人口群体受枸杞多糖症的影响最大:研究使用了 2018 年 BIBB/BAuA 就业调查的数据(N = 16252)。年龄、教育程度、职业类别、收入、工作时间、非典型工作时间、关系状况和有无子女作为社会人口学预测因素。研究人员进行了性别分层逻辑回归分析和交叉分类树分析:结果:与男性相比,女性的枸杞多糖症发病率更高。在年龄、工作时间、非典型工作时间、职业类别和教育程度方面,枸杞多糖症出现了显著差异,在预测因素的重要性方面也存在一些性别差异:与女性相比,年龄对男性来说是一个重要的预测因素,非典型工作时间对女性的影响稍大,而职业组别对男性枸杞痛的影响则更为明显。研究发现,从事专业人员或管理人员以外的职业、非典型工作时间、中等或低教育水平的女性,以及从事熟练农业工人、手工业工人、机械操作员或初级职业、年龄在 35 岁至 64 岁之间的男性是枸杞痛的易感人群:因此,从事某些职业和教育水平较低的工人、中年男子和工作时间特点不利的妇女受腰背痛的影响最大。应重点关注这些群体,以提高他们的健康工作生活水平并预防工作残疾。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 医学-风湿病学
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
8.70%
发文量
1017
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of musculoskeletal disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology. The scope of the Journal covers research into rheumatic diseases where the primary focus relates specifically to a component(s) of the musculoskeletal system.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信