Outcomes of orthopaedic surgery in Ehlers-Danlos syndromes: a scoping review.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Jane R Schubart, Susan E Mills, Scott A Rodeo, Clair A Francomano
{"title":"Outcomes of orthopaedic surgery in Ehlers-Danlos syndromes: a scoping review.","authors":"Jane R Schubart, Susan E Mills, Scott A Rodeo, Clair A Francomano","doi":"10.1186/s12891-024-07937-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with Ehlers-Danlos syndromes (EDS) often experience high rates of joint subluxations and dislocations, and associated pain that may require surgical interventions. Orthopaedic surgical management is challenging in this population, and patients will often undergo multiple unsuccessful surgeries. Outcomes data specific to patients with EDS are sparse in the orthopaedic surgery literature. We conducted a scoping review to evaluate the evidence and outcomes for orthopaedic surgery specifically for the EDS population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed MEDLINE, Embase, The Cochrane Library, Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials (CENTRAL), CINHL, and Scopus from their inception to February 28, 2024 for all studies that reported outcomes for orthopaedic surgery in patients with EDS. Two reviewers independently determined study eligibility, rated study quality, and extracted data. Methodology followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). The studies in this scoping review include Level III (retrospective cohort and case control) and Level IV (case series) evidence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The literature search yielded a total of 71 citations published between 1990 and 2023. All were primary studies. 38 were single case studies, 14 were case series, and 19 were retrospective cohort studies. No randomized clinical studies or systematic reviews were identified. Overall, the reported findings for the various anatomical sites and procedures indicated that surgery outcomes were inconsistent. Our review highlights the need for future research to determine whether currently established surgical approaches for various orthopaedic conditions offer long-term clinical benefit in patients with EDS. This is clearly a challenging diagnosis, and more rigorous clinical studies are required to identify optimal treatment approaches.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our review found little evidence-based research to guide optimal surgical treatment in EDS. Established surgical techniques that have been shown to be successful in the wider orthopaedic population should be studied to determine their efficacy in the EDS population.</p>","PeriodicalId":9189,"journal":{"name":"BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11515420/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-024-07937-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Patients with Ehlers-Danlos syndromes (EDS) often experience high rates of joint subluxations and dislocations, and associated pain that may require surgical interventions. Orthopaedic surgical management is challenging in this population, and patients will often undergo multiple unsuccessful surgeries. Outcomes data specific to patients with EDS are sparse in the orthopaedic surgery literature. We conducted a scoping review to evaluate the evidence and outcomes for orthopaedic surgery specifically for the EDS population.

Methods: PubMed MEDLINE, Embase, The Cochrane Library, Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials (CENTRAL), CINHL, and Scopus from their inception to February 28, 2024 for all studies that reported outcomes for orthopaedic surgery in patients with EDS. Two reviewers independently determined study eligibility, rated study quality, and extracted data. Methodology followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). The studies in this scoping review include Level III (retrospective cohort and case control) and Level IV (case series) evidence.

Results: The literature search yielded a total of 71 citations published between 1990 and 2023. All were primary studies. 38 were single case studies, 14 were case series, and 19 were retrospective cohort studies. No randomized clinical studies or systematic reviews were identified. Overall, the reported findings for the various anatomical sites and procedures indicated that surgery outcomes were inconsistent. Our review highlights the need for future research to determine whether currently established surgical approaches for various orthopaedic conditions offer long-term clinical benefit in patients with EDS. This is clearly a challenging diagnosis, and more rigorous clinical studies are required to identify optimal treatment approaches.

Conclusions: Our review found little evidence-based research to guide optimal surgical treatment in EDS. Established surgical techniques that have been shown to be successful in the wider orthopaedic population should be studied to determine their efficacy in the EDS population.

埃勒斯-丹洛斯综合征矫形手术的疗效:范围界定综述。
背景:埃勒斯-丹洛斯综合征(EDS)患者经常出现高比例的关节脱位和脱臼,并伴有疼痛,可能需要手术治疗。骨科手术治疗对这一人群来说具有挑战性,患者往往会经历多次不成功的手术。骨科手术文献中专门针对 EDS 患者的疗效数据非常稀少。我们进行了一项范围审查,以评估专门针对 EDS 患者的骨科手术的证据和结果:从 PubMed MEDLINE、Embase、Cochrane 图书馆、Cochrane 试验对照注册中心 (CENTRAL)、CINHL 和 Scopus 开始至 2024 年 2 月 28 日,对所有报告 EDS 患者矫形手术结果的研究进行检索。两名审稿人独立确定研究资格、评定研究质量并提取数据。研究方法遵循《系统综述和荟萃分析首选报告项目》(Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews,PRISMA-ScR)。本范围综述中的研究包括三级(回顾性队列和病例对照)和四级(病例系列)证据:文献检索结果显示,1990 年至 2023 年间共发表了 71 篇引文。所有文献均为主要研究。其中 38 篇为单一病例研究,14 篇为病例系列研究,19 篇为回顾性队列研究。未发现随机临床研究或系统综述。总体而言,针对不同解剖部位和手术方法的研究结果表明,手术结果并不一致。我们的综述强调了未来研究的必要性,以确定目前针对各种骨科疾病的既定手术方法是否能为 EDS 患者带来长期临床获益。这显然是一个具有挑战性的诊断,需要更严格的临床研究来确定最佳治疗方法:我们的综述发现,几乎没有循证研究可以指导 EDS 的最佳手术治疗。应研究已在更广泛的骨科人群中取得成功的成熟手术技术,以确定其在EDS人群中的疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 医学-风湿病学
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
8.70%
发文量
1017
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of musculoskeletal disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology. The scope of the Journal covers research into rheumatic diseases where the primary focus relates specifically to a component(s) of the musculoskeletal system.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信