Development and validation of the sarcopenia disease risk perception scale for older adults.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Wenjuan Zhang, Ziyu Sun, Jiaqi Wang, Yuhong Wu
{"title":"Development and validation of the sarcopenia disease risk perception scale for older adults.","authors":"Wenjuan Zhang, Ziyu Sun, Jiaqi Wang, Yuhong Wu","doi":"10.1186/s12877-024-05487-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sarcopenia represents a constant threat to the health of older adults, and accurate risk perception is essential for disease prevention and control. However, current methodologies lack rigorously validated instruments to assess the perceived risk of sarcopenia among this group. Thus, this study aimed to develop and validate a sarcopenia disease risk perception scale for older adults.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>The study was conducted in two phases: development of the initial scale and its psychometric evaluation. A STROBE checklist was employed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Based on the two-factor model of risk perception theory and the health belief model, the initial draft of the scale was created through literature review, expert consultations, and a preliminary survey with a small sample. Then, we used a cross-sectional study methodology to conveniently select 438 Chinese older adults. Item analysis, exploratory factor analysis (EFA), and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) were used to refine and validate the scale items. Internal consistency and external consistency were assessed to confirm the scale's reliability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>These evaluations established the scale's framework: content validity, item analysis, and EFA. The two factors extracted from the initial analysis explained 62.250% of the observation variance. The CFA confirmed a good fit for the model, demonstrating the scale's robust reliability and validity. The finalized scale includes 15 items and two dimensions: perceived susceptibility (eight items) and perceived severity (seven items).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Sarcopenia Disease Risk Perception Scale for Older Adults is reliable and valid, making it appropriate for assessing the risk perception level in the target population.</p>","PeriodicalId":9056,"journal":{"name":"BMC Geriatrics","volume":"24 1","pages":"876"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11515350/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Geriatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-024-05487-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Sarcopenia represents a constant threat to the health of older adults, and accurate risk perception is essential for disease prevention and control. However, current methodologies lack rigorously validated instruments to assess the perceived risk of sarcopenia among this group. Thus, this study aimed to develop and validate a sarcopenia disease risk perception scale for older adults.

Design: The study was conducted in two phases: development of the initial scale and its psychometric evaluation. A STROBE checklist was employed.

Methods: Based on the two-factor model of risk perception theory and the health belief model, the initial draft of the scale was created through literature review, expert consultations, and a preliminary survey with a small sample. Then, we used a cross-sectional study methodology to conveniently select 438 Chinese older adults. Item analysis, exploratory factor analysis (EFA), and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) were used to refine and validate the scale items. Internal consistency and external consistency were assessed to confirm the scale's reliability.

Results: These evaluations established the scale's framework: content validity, item analysis, and EFA. The two factors extracted from the initial analysis explained 62.250% of the observation variance. The CFA confirmed a good fit for the model, demonstrating the scale's robust reliability and validity. The finalized scale includes 15 items and two dimensions: perceived susceptibility (eight items) and perceived severity (seven items).

Conclusion: The Sarcopenia Disease Risk Perception Scale for Older Adults is reliable and valid, making it appropriate for assessing the risk perception level in the target population.

开发并验证老年人肌肉疏松症疾病风险认知量表。
背景:肌肉疏松症对老年人的健康构成持续威胁,准确的风险认知对疾病预防和控制至关重要。然而,目前的方法缺乏经过严格验证的工具来评估该群体对肌肉疏松症的风险认知。因此,本研究旨在为老年人开发并验证肌肉疏松症疾病风险认知量表:研究分两个阶段进行:开发初始量表及其心理测量评估。方法:根据风险认知理论的双因素模型和健康信念模型,通过文献查阅、专家咨询和小样本初步调查,编制了量表初稿。然后,我们采用横断面研究方法,方便地选取了 438 名中国老年人。通过项目分析、探索性因子分析(EFA)和确认性因子分析(CFA)来完善和验证量表项目。对量表的内部一致性和外部一致性进行了评估,以确认量表的可靠性:这些评估确立了量表的框架:内容效度、项目分析和 EFA。初步分析提取的两个因子解释了 62.250% 的观察方差。CFA 证实了模型的良好拟合,证明了量表的可靠性和有效性。最终确定的量表包括 15 个项目和两个维度:感知易感性(8 个项目)和感知严重性(7 个项目):结论:《老年人肌肉疏松症疾病风险认知量表》具有可靠性和有效性,适合用于评估目标人群的风险认知水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Geriatrics
BMC Geriatrics GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
7.30%
发文量
873
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Geriatrics is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in all aspects of the health and healthcare of older people, including the effects of healthcare systems and policies. The journal also welcomes research focused on the aging process, including cellular, genetic, and physiological processes and cognitive modifications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信