An assessment of adequate quality antenatal care and its determinants in India.

IF 2.8 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Saif Nihal, Chander Shekhar
{"title":"An assessment of adequate quality antenatal care and its determinants in India.","authors":"Saif Nihal, Chander Shekhar","doi":"10.1186/s12884-024-06806-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Antenatal care (ANC) is an important component in the continuum of care. Providing adequate quality ANC is necessary to prevent maternal and newborn mortality. The coverage of ANC has increased significantly in the last decade in India, but a mere increase in coverage is insufficient if the issue of quality is not simultaneously addressed. This study examines the change in each component of quality ANC between 2015-16 and 2019-21, highlights the factors associated with adequate quality ANC, and observes the state- and district-level distribution of adequate quality ANC during 2019-21.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study is based on data from the two most recent rounds of the National Family Health Survey (NFHS), the Indian equivalent of the Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS). These rounds were conducted in 2015-16 and 2019-21 in selected households of India with a total of 190,797 and 176,843 sampled births, respectively. The dependent variable was quality antenatal care, a composite variable consisting of skilled healthcare providers, timeliness, sufficiency, and appropriateness of content. The independent variables were mother's age, education, wealth quintile, birth order, mass media exposure, health insurance coverage, relationship with the head of household, facility exposure, intended pregnancy, history of adverse pregnancy outcomes, and other socio-demographic variables. Change in each component and dimension of quality antenatal care was assessed using data from both rounds of the survey. A multivariate multinomial logistic regression analysis was employed to identify the determinants of adequate quality ANC using the NFHS-5 data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The findings revealed that 32 per cent of mothers received adequate quality antenatal care in 2019-2021, an increase of only 9% points compared to the 2015-16 period. Two significant barriers to achieving adequate quality antenatal care, in terms of appropriateness of content, were the provision of Iron and Folic Acid (IFA) tablets and counselling. The highest utilisation of adequate quality antenatal care was observed in the southern states. The utilisation of quality ANC increased with an increase in women's education and wealth status; and was more prevalent among those with health insurance coverage and exposure to mass media.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite some improvements in the coverage of antenatal care, the quality of antenatal care continues to be very low and needs urgent attention. Achieving quality antenatal care in both content and experience requires addressing service gaps and developing better measures to capture and improve women's care experiences.</p>","PeriodicalId":9033,"journal":{"name":"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11515398/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-024-06806-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Antenatal care (ANC) is an important component in the continuum of care. Providing adequate quality ANC is necessary to prevent maternal and newborn mortality. The coverage of ANC has increased significantly in the last decade in India, but a mere increase in coverage is insufficient if the issue of quality is not simultaneously addressed. This study examines the change in each component of quality ANC between 2015-16 and 2019-21, highlights the factors associated with adequate quality ANC, and observes the state- and district-level distribution of adequate quality ANC during 2019-21.

Methods: This study is based on data from the two most recent rounds of the National Family Health Survey (NFHS), the Indian equivalent of the Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS). These rounds were conducted in 2015-16 and 2019-21 in selected households of India with a total of 190,797 and 176,843 sampled births, respectively. The dependent variable was quality antenatal care, a composite variable consisting of skilled healthcare providers, timeliness, sufficiency, and appropriateness of content. The independent variables were mother's age, education, wealth quintile, birth order, mass media exposure, health insurance coverage, relationship with the head of household, facility exposure, intended pregnancy, history of adverse pregnancy outcomes, and other socio-demographic variables. Change in each component and dimension of quality antenatal care was assessed using data from both rounds of the survey. A multivariate multinomial logistic regression analysis was employed to identify the determinants of adequate quality ANC using the NFHS-5 data.

Results: The findings revealed that 32 per cent of mothers received adequate quality antenatal care in 2019-2021, an increase of only 9% points compared to the 2015-16 period. Two significant barriers to achieving adequate quality antenatal care, in terms of appropriateness of content, were the provision of Iron and Folic Acid (IFA) tablets and counselling. The highest utilisation of adequate quality antenatal care was observed in the southern states. The utilisation of quality ANC increased with an increase in women's education and wealth status; and was more prevalent among those with health insurance coverage and exposure to mass media.

Conclusion: Despite some improvements in the coverage of antenatal care, the quality of antenatal care continues to be very low and needs urgent attention. Achieving quality antenatal care in both content and experience requires addressing service gaps and developing better measures to capture and improve women's care experiences.

对印度产前护理质量及其决定因素的评估。
背景:产前护理(ANC)是持续护理的重要组成部分。为防止孕产妇和新生儿死亡,有必要提供适当的高质量产前护理。过去十年中,印度的产前护理覆盖率大幅提高,但如果不同时解决质量问题,仅提高覆盖率是不够的。本研究探讨了 2015-16 年至 2019-21 年期间优质产前护理各组成部分的变化,强调了与适当优质产前护理相关的因素,并观察了 2019-21 年期间邦和区一级适当优质产前护理的分布情况:本研究基于最近两轮全国家庭健康调查(NFHS)的数据,该调查相当于印度的人口与健康调查(DHS)。这两轮调查分别于 2015-16 年和 2019-21 年在印度选定的家庭中进行,抽样出生人数分别为 190,797 人和 176,843 人。因变量是产前护理质量,这是一个由熟练的医疗保健提供者、及时性、充分性和内容适当性组成的复合变量。自变量包括母亲的年龄、教育程度、财富五分位数、出生顺序、大众媒体接触情况、医疗保险覆盖率、与户主的关系、设施接触情况、预期怀孕情况、不良妊娠结局史以及其他社会人口变量。利用两轮调查的数据评估了优质产前保健的各个组成部分和维度的变化。利用 NFHS-5 的数据进行了多变量多项式逻辑回归分析,以确定适当优质产前保健的决定因素:调查结果显示,2019-2021年有32%的母亲接受了适当质量的产前保健,与2015-16年相比仅增加了9%个百分点。就内容的适当性而言,实现适当质量产前保健的两个重要障碍是提供铁和叶酸(IFA)片和咨询。南部各州对高质量产前保健的利用率最高。优质产前护理的利用率随着妇女教育程度和财富状况的提高而增加;在那些有医疗保险和接触大众媒体的妇女中,优质产前护理的利用率更高:结论:尽管产前保健的覆盖率有所提高,但产前保健的质量仍然很低,亟需关注。要在内容和体验两方面实现高质量的产前护理,就必须解决服务差距问题,并制定更好的措施来记录和改善妇女的护理体验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
6.50%
发文量
845
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Pregnancy & Childbirth is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of pregnancy and childbirth. The journal welcomes submissions on the biomedical aspects of pregnancy, breastfeeding, labor, maternal health, maternity care, trends and sociological aspects of pregnancy and childbirth.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信