Suicide among post-Arabellion refugees in Germany.

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
BJPsych Open Pub Date : 2024-10-25 DOI:10.1192/bjo.2024.755
Nensy Thu Ha Le, Jon Genuneit, Gerald Brennecke, Georg von Polier, Lars White, Daniel Radeloff
{"title":"Suicide among post-Arabellion refugees in Germany.","authors":"Nensy Thu Ha Le, Jon Genuneit, Gerald Brennecke, Georg von Polier, Lars White, Daniel Radeloff","doi":"10.1192/bjo.2024.755","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although immigrants are considered to be vulnerable to mental illness, there is limited knowledge regarding their suicide mortality.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To investigate standardised mortality ratios (SMR) for suicide among the largest immigrant populations in Germany before and after the refugee movement of 2015.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Data on immigrants and the general population in Germany between 2000 and 2020 were provided by the scientific section of the Federal Statistical Office. SMR with 95% confidence intervals were calculated by indirect standardisation for gender, age and calendar year for the pre-2015 and post-2015 time interval, first for all the immigrant populations studied and second for the Syrian, Afghan and Iraqi populations separately.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Immigrants from the countries studied showed a lower suicide risk compared with the German reference population (SMR = 0.38, 95% CI = 0.35-0.41). No differences in SMR were found between pre- and post-2015 time intervals, in either the aggregate data for all populations or the data for Syrian, Afghan and Iraqi populations. Post-2015, Afghan immigrants (SMR = 0.68, 95% CI = 0.54-0.83) showed a higher SMR than Syrians (SMR = 0.30, 95% CI = 0.25-0.36) or Iraqis (SMR = 0.37, 95% CI = 0.26-0.48).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite the many and varied stresses associated with flight, comparison of the pre- and post-2015 time intervals showed that the suicide risk of the populations studied did not change and was considerably lower than that of the German reference population. We attribute this to lower suicide rates in the countries of origin but also to flight-related selection processes that favour more resilient individuals.</p>","PeriodicalId":9038,"journal":{"name":"BJPsych Open","volume":"10 6","pages":"e188"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJPsych Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2024.755","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Although immigrants are considered to be vulnerable to mental illness, there is limited knowledge regarding their suicide mortality.

Aims: To investigate standardised mortality ratios (SMR) for suicide among the largest immigrant populations in Germany before and after the refugee movement of 2015.

Method: Data on immigrants and the general population in Germany between 2000 and 2020 were provided by the scientific section of the Federal Statistical Office. SMR with 95% confidence intervals were calculated by indirect standardisation for gender, age and calendar year for the pre-2015 and post-2015 time interval, first for all the immigrant populations studied and second for the Syrian, Afghan and Iraqi populations separately.

Results: Immigrants from the countries studied showed a lower suicide risk compared with the German reference population (SMR = 0.38, 95% CI = 0.35-0.41). No differences in SMR were found between pre- and post-2015 time intervals, in either the aggregate data for all populations or the data for Syrian, Afghan and Iraqi populations. Post-2015, Afghan immigrants (SMR = 0.68, 95% CI = 0.54-0.83) showed a higher SMR than Syrians (SMR = 0.30, 95% CI = 0.25-0.36) or Iraqis (SMR = 0.37, 95% CI = 0.26-0.48).

Conclusions: Despite the many and varied stresses associated with flight, comparison of the pre- and post-2015 time intervals showed that the suicide risk of the populations studied did not change and was considerably lower than that of the German reference population. We attribute this to lower suicide rates in the countries of origin but also to flight-related selection processes that favour more resilient individuals.

德国境内阿拉伯叛乱后难民的自杀情况。
背景:目的:调查 2015 年难民潮前后德国最大移民群体的自杀标准化死亡率(SMR):方法:联邦统计局科学部提供了2000年至2020年间德国移民和普通人口的数据。通过对2015年之前和2015年之后的时间间隔进行性别、年龄和日历年的间接标准化,首先计算了所有被研究移民人口的SMR,其次分别计算了叙利亚、阿富汗和伊拉克人口的SMR,并得出了95%的置信区间:与德国参考人群相比,来自所研究国家的移民自杀风险较低(SMR = 0.38,95% CI = 0.35-0.41)。无论是所有人群的总体数据,还是叙利亚、阿富汗和伊拉克人群的数据,都没有发现 2015 年前和 2015 年后的时间间隔在 SMR 方面存在差异。2015年后,阿富汗移民(SMR = 0.68,95% CI = 0.54-0.83)的SMR高于叙利亚人(SMR = 0.30,95% CI = 0.25-0.36)或伊拉克人(SMR = 0.37,95% CI = 0.26-0.48):尽管与飞行相关的压力多种多样,但对 2015 年之前和之后的时间段进行比较后发现,所研究人群的自杀风险没有变化,而且大大低于德国参考人群的自杀风险。我们将此归因于原籍国较低的自杀率,但也归因于与飞行相关的选择过程,这种选择过程有利于复原力更强的个体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BJPsych Open
BJPsych Open Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
3.70%
发文量
610
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Announcing the launch of BJPsych Open, an exciting new open access online journal for the publication of all methodologically sound research in all fields of psychiatry and disciplines related to mental health. BJPsych Open will maintain the highest scientific, peer review, and ethical standards of the BJPsych, ensure rapid publication for authors whilst sharing research with no cost to the reader in the spirit of maximising dissemination and public engagement. Cascade submission from BJPsych to BJPsych Open is a new option for authors whose first priority is rapid online publication with the prestigious BJPsych brand. Authors will also retain copyright to their works under a creative commons license.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信