Evidencing the challenges of care delivery for people with intellectual disability and epilepsy in England by using the Step Together toolkit.

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
BJPsych Open Pub Date : 2024-10-28 DOI:10.1192/bjo.2024.749
Tom Shillito, Lance Watkins, Hafsha Ali, Georgina Page, Angie Pullen, Sarah Mitchell, Ashok Roy, Arjune Sen, Michael Kinney, Rhys Thomas, Phil Tittensor, Manny Bagary, Arun Subramanium, Bridie Kent, Rohit Shankar
{"title":"Evidencing the challenges of care delivery for people with intellectual disability and epilepsy in England by using the Step Together toolkit.","authors":"Tom Shillito, Lance Watkins, Hafsha Ali, Georgina Page, Angie Pullen, Sarah Mitchell, Ashok Roy, Arjune Sen, Michael Kinney, Rhys Thomas, Phil Tittensor, Manny Bagary, Arun Subramanium, Bridie Kent, Rohit Shankar","doi":"10.1192/bjo.2024.749","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>People with intellectual disability (PwID) and epilepsy have increased premature and potentially preventable mortality. This is related to a lack of equitable access to appropriate care. The Step Together guidance and toolkit, developed with patient, clinical, charity and commissioning stakeholders, allows evaluation and benchmarking of essential epilepsy service provision for PwID in eight key domains, at a care system level.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To evaluate care provisions for adult PwID and epilepsy at a system level in the 11 integrated care systems (ICSs) of the Midlands, the largest NHS England region (population: approximately 11 million), using the Step Together toolkit.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Post training, each ICS undertook its benchmarking with the toolkit and submitted their scores to Epilepsy Action, a national UK epilepsy charity, who oversaw the process. The outcomes were analysed descriptively to provide results, individual and cumulative, at care domain and system levels.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The toolkit was completed fully by nine of the 11 ICSs. Across all eight domains, overall score was 44.2% (mean 44.2%, median 43.3%, range 52.4%, interquartile range 23.8-76.2%). The domains of local planning (mean 31.1%, median 27.5%) and care planning (mean 31.4%, median 35.4%) scored the lowest, and sharing information scored the highest (mean 55.2%, median 62.5%). There was significant variability across each domain between the nine ICS. The user/carer participation domain had the widest variation across ICSs (0-100%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results demonstrate a significant variance in service provision for PwID and epilepsy across the nine ICSs. The toolkit identifies specific areas for improvement within each ICS and region.</p>","PeriodicalId":9038,"journal":{"name":"BJPsych Open","volume":"10 6","pages":"e186"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJPsych Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2024.749","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: People with intellectual disability (PwID) and epilepsy have increased premature and potentially preventable mortality. This is related to a lack of equitable access to appropriate care. The Step Together guidance and toolkit, developed with patient, clinical, charity and commissioning stakeholders, allows evaluation and benchmarking of essential epilepsy service provision for PwID in eight key domains, at a care system level.

Aims: To evaluate care provisions for adult PwID and epilepsy at a system level in the 11 integrated care systems (ICSs) of the Midlands, the largest NHS England region (population: approximately 11 million), using the Step Together toolkit.

Method: Post training, each ICS undertook its benchmarking with the toolkit and submitted their scores to Epilepsy Action, a national UK epilepsy charity, who oversaw the process. The outcomes were analysed descriptively to provide results, individual and cumulative, at care domain and system levels.

Results: The toolkit was completed fully by nine of the 11 ICSs. Across all eight domains, overall score was 44.2% (mean 44.2%, median 43.3%, range 52.4%, interquartile range 23.8-76.2%). The domains of local planning (mean 31.1%, median 27.5%) and care planning (mean 31.4%, median 35.4%) scored the lowest, and sharing information scored the highest (mean 55.2%, median 62.5%). There was significant variability across each domain between the nine ICS. The user/carer participation domain had the widest variation across ICSs (0-100%).

Conclusions: The results demonstrate a significant variance in service provision for PwID and epilepsy across the nine ICSs. The toolkit identifies specific areas for improvement within each ICS and region.

通过使用 "齐心协力 "工具包,证明为英格兰智障人士和癫痫患者提供护理所面临的挑战。
背景:智障人士(PwID)和癫痫患者的过早死亡率和潜在的可预防死亡率都在上升。这与缺乏公平获得适当护理的机会有关。与患者、临床、慈善机构和委托方等利益相关者共同开发的 "齐心协力 "指南和工具包允许在护理系统层面对八个关键领域为智障人士提供的基本癫痫服务进行评估和设定基准。目的:使用 "齐心协力 "工具包,在英格兰国家医疗服务系统(NHS)最大的地区--中部地区的 11 个综合护理系统(ICS)的系统层面评估为成年智障人士和癫痫患者提供的护理服务:方法:培训结束后,每个综合医疗系统根据工具包进行基准测试,并将分数提交给负责监督该过程的英国全国性癫痫慈善机构 "癫痫行动"(Epilepsy Action)。对结果进行描述性分析,以提供护理领域和系统层面的个人和累积结果:结果:11 家综合服务社中有 9 家全面完成了工具包。在所有八个领域中,总体得分率为 44.2%(平均值 44.2%,中位数 43.3%,范围 52.4%,四分位数间距 23.8-76.2%)。本地规划(平均值 31.1%,中位值 27.5%)和护理规划(平均值 31.4%,中位值 35.4%)得分最低,信息共享得分最高(平均值 55.2%,中位值 62.5%)。九家综合服务机构在每个领域的得分差异很大。用户/护理人员参与领域在各综合服务社之间的差异最大(0-100%):结果表明,九家综合服务中心在为残疾人和癫痫患者提供服务方面存在很大差异。该工具包确定了各综合服务中心和地区需要改进的具体领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BJPsych Open
BJPsych Open Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
3.70%
发文量
610
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Announcing the launch of BJPsych Open, an exciting new open access online journal for the publication of all methodologically sound research in all fields of psychiatry and disciplines related to mental health. BJPsych Open will maintain the highest scientific, peer review, and ethical standards of the BJPsych, ensure rapid publication for authors whilst sharing research with no cost to the reader in the spirit of maximising dissemination and public engagement. Cascade submission from BJPsych to BJPsych Open is a new option for authors whose first priority is rapid online publication with the prestigious BJPsych brand. Authors will also retain copyright to their works under a creative commons license.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信