Mode of delivery in chorioamnionitis: impact on neonatal and maternal outcomes.

IF 2.8 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Vanessa R Kay, Isabella Liang, Jennifer Twiss, Michelle Morais
{"title":"Mode of delivery in chorioamnionitis: impact on neonatal and maternal outcomes.","authors":"Vanessa R Kay, Isabella Liang, Jennifer Twiss, Michelle Morais","doi":"10.1186/s12884-024-06877-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The impact of mode of delivery in chorioamnionitis on neonatal outcomes is unclear. This retrospective cohort study compares the rate of early onset neonatal sepsis between vaginal delivery and cesarean section.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Singleton pregnancies at greater than 24 + 0 weeks gestation with live birth and clinically-diagnosed chorioamnionitis from January 1, 2019 to December 31, 2021 were included. Cases with multiple gestations, terminations or histological chorioamnionitis alone were excluded. Rates of early onset neonatal sepsis, select secondary neonatal outcomes and a composite outcome of maternal infectious morbidity were compared using propensity score weighting. Subgroup analysis was done by indication for cesarean section.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After chart review, 378 cases were included with 197 delivering vaginally and 181 delivering via cesarean section. The groups differed on age, parity, hypertension, renal disease, gestational age, corticosteroid use, magnesium sulfate use, presence of meconium and percentage meeting Gibbs criteria before propensity score weighting. Rate of early onset neonatal sepsis was greater in the cesarean section group (13.8% versus 3.1%, adjusted risk difference 8.3% [3.5-13.1], p < 0.001). Secondary neonatal outcomes were similar between groups. When compared by indication, the rate of early onset neonatal sepsis was greater in the cesarean section for abnormal fetal surveillance group compared to vaginal delivery but not in the cesarean section for other reasons group. Adjusted rates of secondary neonatal outcomes did not differ between groups. The rate of maternal infectious morbidity was greater with cesarean section. (13.8% versus 1.5% [adjusted risk difference 13.0% [7.1-18.9], p < 0.0001). No other difference in maternal secondary outcomes was identified.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The rate of early onset neonatal sepsis was highest in the cesarean section group, particularly in those with abnormal fetal surveillance. Fetuses affected by or vulnerable to sepsis likely have a greater need for cesarean section.</p>","PeriodicalId":9033,"journal":{"name":"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth","volume":"24 1","pages":"693"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11520153/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-024-06877-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The impact of mode of delivery in chorioamnionitis on neonatal outcomes is unclear. This retrospective cohort study compares the rate of early onset neonatal sepsis between vaginal delivery and cesarean section.

Methods: Singleton pregnancies at greater than 24 + 0 weeks gestation with live birth and clinically-diagnosed chorioamnionitis from January 1, 2019 to December 31, 2021 were included. Cases with multiple gestations, terminations or histological chorioamnionitis alone were excluded. Rates of early onset neonatal sepsis, select secondary neonatal outcomes and a composite outcome of maternal infectious morbidity were compared using propensity score weighting. Subgroup analysis was done by indication for cesarean section.

Results: After chart review, 378 cases were included with 197 delivering vaginally and 181 delivering via cesarean section. The groups differed on age, parity, hypertension, renal disease, gestational age, corticosteroid use, magnesium sulfate use, presence of meconium and percentage meeting Gibbs criteria before propensity score weighting. Rate of early onset neonatal sepsis was greater in the cesarean section group (13.8% versus 3.1%, adjusted risk difference 8.3% [3.5-13.1], p < 0.001). Secondary neonatal outcomes were similar between groups. When compared by indication, the rate of early onset neonatal sepsis was greater in the cesarean section for abnormal fetal surveillance group compared to vaginal delivery but not in the cesarean section for other reasons group. Adjusted rates of secondary neonatal outcomes did not differ between groups. The rate of maternal infectious morbidity was greater with cesarean section. (13.8% versus 1.5% [adjusted risk difference 13.0% [7.1-18.9], p < 0.0001). No other difference in maternal secondary outcomes was identified.

Conclusions: The rate of early onset neonatal sepsis was highest in the cesarean section group, particularly in those with abnormal fetal surveillance. Fetuses affected by or vulnerable to sepsis likely have a greater need for cesarean section.

绒毛膜羊膜炎的分娩方式:对新生儿和产妇预后的影响。
背景:绒毛膜羊膜炎的分娩方式对新生儿预后的影响尚不明确。这项回顾性队列研究比较了阴道分娩和剖宫产的新生儿早期败血症发生率:方法:纳入2019年1月1日至2021年12月31日期间妊娠大于24+0周、活产且临床诊断为绒毛膜羊膜炎的单胎妊娠。不包括多胎妊娠、终止妊娠或仅有组织学绒毛膜羊膜炎的病例。采用倾向得分加权法比较了早发性新生儿败血症、部分继发性新生儿结局和孕产妇感染性发病率的综合结局的发生率。根据剖宫产指征进行了分组分析:经过病历审查,共纳入 378 例病例,其中 197 例为阴道分娩,181 例为剖宫产。两组在年龄、胎次、高血压、肾病、胎龄、皮质类固醇的使用、硫酸镁的使用、胎粪的存在以及倾向评分加权前符合吉布斯标准的百分比方面存在差异。剖宫产组新生儿早发败血症率更高(13.8% 对 3.1%,调整后风险差异为 8.3% [3.5-13.1],P 结论:剖宫产组新生儿早发败血症率更高:剖宫产组新生儿早发败血症的发生率最高,尤其是在胎儿监测异常的情况下。受败血症影响或易患败血症的胎儿可能更需要剖宫产。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
6.50%
发文量
845
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Pregnancy & Childbirth is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of pregnancy and childbirth. The journal welcomes submissions on the biomedical aspects of pregnancy, breastfeeding, labor, maternal health, maternity care, trends and sociological aspects of pregnancy and childbirth.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信