Predicting pathological complete response following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer using merged model integrating MRI-based radiomics and deep learning data.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Haidi Lu, Yuan Yuan, Minglu Liu, Zhihui Li, Xiaolu Ma, Yuwei Xia, Feng Shi, Yong Lu, Jianping Lu, Fu Shen
{"title":"Predicting pathological complete response following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer using merged model integrating MRI-based radiomics and deep learning data.","authors":"Haidi Lu, Yuan Yuan, Minglu Liu, Zhihui Li, Xiaolu Ma, Yuwei Xia, Feng Shi, Yong Lu, Jianping Lu, Fu Shen","doi":"10.1186/s12880-024-01474-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To construct and compare merged models integrating clinical factors, MRI-based radiomics features and deep learning (DL) models for predicting pathological complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Totally 197 patients with LARC administered surgical resection after nCRT were assigned to cohort 1 (training and test sets); meanwhile, 52 cases were assigned to cohort 2 as a validation set. Radscore and DL models were established for predicting pCR applying pre- and post-nCRT MRI data, respectively. Different merged models integrating clinical factors, Radscore and DL model were constituted. Their predictive performances were validated and compared by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and decision curve analyses (DCA).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Merged models were established integrating selected clinical factors, Radscore and DL model for pCR prediction. The areas under the ROC curves (AUCs) of the pre-nCRT merged model were 0.834 (95% CI: 0.737-0.931) and 0.742 (95% CI: 0.650-0.834) in test and validation sets, respectively. The AUCs of the post-nCRT merged model were 0.746 (95% CI: 0.636-0.856) and 0.737 (95% CI: 0.646-0.828) in test and validation sets, respectively. DCA showed that the pretreatment algorithm could yield enhanced clinically benefit than the post-nCRT approach.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The pre-nCRT merged model including clinical factors, Radscore and DL model constitutes an effective non-invasive tool for pCR prediction in LARC.</p>","PeriodicalId":9020,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Imaging","volume":"24 1","pages":"289"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11515279/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12880-024-01474-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: To construct and compare merged models integrating clinical factors, MRI-based radiomics features and deep learning (DL) models for predicting pathological complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC).

Methods: Totally 197 patients with LARC administered surgical resection after nCRT were assigned to cohort 1 (training and test sets); meanwhile, 52 cases were assigned to cohort 2 as a validation set. Radscore and DL models were established for predicting pCR applying pre- and post-nCRT MRI data, respectively. Different merged models integrating clinical factors, Radscore and DL model were constituted. Their predictive performances were validated and compared by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and decision curve analyses (DCA).

Results: Merged models were established integrating selected clinical factors, Radscore and DL model for pCR prediction. The areas under the ROC curves (AUCs) of the pre-nCRT merged model were 0.834 (95% CI: 0.737-0.931) and 0.742 (95% CI: 0.650-0.834) in test and validation sets, respectively. The AUCs of the post-nCRT merged model were 0.746 (95% CI: 0.636-0.856) and 0.737 (95% CI: 0.646-0.828) in test and validation sets, respectively. DCA showed that the pretreatment algorithm could yield enhanced clinically benefit than the post-nCRT approach.

Conclusions: The pre-nCRT merged model including clinical factors, Radscore and DL model constitutes an effective non-invasive tool for pCR prediction in LARC.

利用基于磁共振成像的放射组学和深度学习数据的合并模型预测局部晚期直肠癌患者新辅助化放疗(nCRT)后的病理完全反应。
背景:构建并比较综合临床因素、基于磁共振成像的放射组学特征和深度学习(DL)模型的合并模型,以预测局部晚期直肠癌(LARC)患者对新辅助化放疗(nCRT)的病理完全反应(pCR):方法:197例局部晚期直肠癌(LARC)患者在接受新辅助化疗(nCRT)后接受了手术切除,这些患者被分配到群组1(训练集和测试集);同时,52例患者被分配到群组2作为验证集。应用nCRT前和nCRT后的磁共振成像数据,分别建立了预测pCR的Radscore和DL模型。综合临床因素、Radscore 和 DL 模型,建立了不同的合并模型。通过接收器操作特征(ROC)和决策曲线分析(DCA)验证并比较了它们的预测性能:结果:综合选定的临床因素、Radscore和DL模型,建立了预测pCR的合并模型。在测试集和验证集中,nCRT前合并模型的ROC曲线下面积(AUC)分别为0.834(95% CI:0.737-0.931)和0.742(95% CI:0.650-0.834)。在测试集和验证集中,nCRT 后合并模型的 AUC 分别为 0.746(95% CI:0.636-0.856)和 0.737(95% CI:0.646-0.828)。DCA显示,与nCRT后方法相比,预处理算法的临床效益更高:结论:包括临床因素、Radscore和DL模型在内的nCRT前合并模型是预测LARC pCR的有效无创工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Medical Imaging
BMC Medical Imaging RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.70%
发文量
198
审稿时长
27 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Imaging is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in the development, evaluation, and use of imaging techniques and image processing tools to diagnose and manage disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信