Diversity and structure of epibenthic communities across subtidal artificial hard habitats in the Bay of Cherbourg (English Channel).

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Bastien Taormina, Jean-Charles Leclerc, Anne-Marie Rusig, Maxime Navon, Maël Deloor, Pascal Claquin, Jean-Claude Dauvin
{"title":"Diversity and structure of epibenthic communities across subtidal artificial hard habitats in the Bay of Cherbourg (English Channel).","authors":"Bastien Taormina, Jean-Charles Leclerc, Anne-Marie Rusig, Maxime Navon, Maël Deloor, Pascal Claquin, Jean-Claude Dauvin","doi":"10.1080/08927014.2024.2419572","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To inform the performance of ecological engineering designs for artificial structures at sea, it is essential to characterise their impacts on the epibenthic communities colonising them. In this context, the present study aims to compare the community structure among natural and four different artificial hard habitats with different ages and features installed in the Bay of Cherbourg (English Channel): <i>i</i>) cinder blocks and <i>ii</i>) boulders, both installed six years prior to the study, and <i>iii</i>) smooth and <i>iv</i>) rugous concrete dykes, both installed one year prior to this study. Results showed that artificial habitats installed six years ago harboured communities with functional and taxonomic diversity characteristic of mature communities but were still different from those of natural habitat. Conversely, the two dyke habitats installed one year prior to this study presented a poorly diversified community dominated by opportunistic taxa. Furthermore, while the concrete used for the two dyke habitats presented different rugosity properties, both habitats supported similar communities, suggesting that such eco-engineering measures did not affect the settlement of early colonisers. Overall, this study highlights the need for long-term monitoring to comprehensively evaluate epibenthic colonisation of artificial structures.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08927014.2024.2419572","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To inform the performance of ecological engineering designs for artificial structures at sea, it is essential to characterise their impacts on the epibenthic communities colonising them. In this context, the present study aims to compare the community structure among natural and four different artificial hard habitats with different ages and features installed in the Bay of Cherbourg (English Channel): i) cinder blocks and ii) boulders, both installed six years prior to the study, and iii) smooth and iv) rugous concrete dykes, both installed one year prior to this study. Results showed that artificial habitats installed six years ago harboured communities with functional and taxonomic diversity characteristic of mature communities but were still different from those of natural habitat. Conversely, the two dyke habitats installed one year prior to this study presented a poorly diversified community dominated by opportunistic taxa. Furthermore, while the concrete used for the two dyke habitats presented different rugosity properties, both habitats supported similar communities, suggesting that such eco-engineering measures did not affect the settlement of early colonisers. Overall, this study highlights the need for long-term monitoring to comprehensively evaluate epibenthic colonisation of artificial structures.

瑟堡湾(英吉利海峡)潮下人工硬质生境底栖生物群落的多样性和结构。
为了解海上人工结构生态工程设计的性能,必须确定其对定居其中的底栖动物群落的影响。在此背景下,本研究旨在比较在瑟堡湾(英吉利海峡)安装的天然栖息地和四种不同年代和特征的人工硬质栖息地的群落结构:i) 煤渣块和 ii) 巨石,均在本研究六年前安装;iii) 平滑和 iv) 凹凸不平的混凝土堤坝,均在本研究一年前安装。结果显示,六年前安装的人工栖息地中的群落具有成熟群落特有的功能和分类多样性,但与自然栖息地中的群落仍有差异。相反,在本研究一年前安装的两个堤坝生境则呈现出以机会性分类群为主的低多样性群落。此外,虽然两个堤坝栖息地使用的混凝土具有不同的凹凸特性,但两个栖息地都支持相似的群落,这表明此类生态工程措施并未影响早期定殖者的定居。总之,本研究强调了长期监测的必要性,以全面评估人工结构的底栖生物定殖情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信