A review of professionalism in surgery.

Q3 Medicine
Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings Pub Date : 2024-09-24 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1080/08998280.2024.2403375
Catherine H Davis, Gayle A DiLalla, Shruthi R Perati, Jenna S Lee, Alisha R Oropallo, Chantal R Reyna, Lisa K Cannada
{"title":"A review of professionalism in surgery.","authors":"Catherine H Davis, Gayle A DiLalla, Shruthi R Perati, Jenna S Lee, Alisha R Oropallo, Chantal R Reyna, Lisa K Cannada","doi":"10.1080/08998280.2024.2403375","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Physicians, and specifically surgeons, have unique expectations and responsibilities regarding professionalism. Further, surgeons interact with multiple different groups of people including surgical peers, trainees, other physicians, ancillary care partners, and patients. Communication between all of these groups must be respectful, appropriate, and effective, even in the high-stress environment of surgery. Norms of professional behavior are evolving to reflect the practices of the current era as well as the increasingly diverse surgical workforce. Thus, multiple surgical societies as well as the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education have incorporated professionalism as a core pillar of surgeon evaluation. While professionalism has typically been modeled, the trait is now being more formally taught in medical education pathways. Future directions for professionalism in surgery include validated modules, more formalized surgeon review, linkage to credentialing, and reimbursement.</p>","PeriodicalId":8828,"journal":{"name":"Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11492646/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08998280.2024.2403375","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Physicians, and specifically surgeons, have unique expectations and responsibilities regarding professionalism. Further, surgeons interact with multiple different groups of people including surgical peers, trainees, other physicians, ancillary care partners, and patients. Communication between all of these groups must be respectful, appropriate, and effective, even in the high-stress environment of surgery. Norms of professional behavior are evolving to reflect the practices of the current era as well as the increasingly diverse surgical workforce. Thus, multiple surgical societies as well as the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education have incorporated professionalism as a core pillar of surgeon evaluation. While professionalism has typically been modeled, the trait is now being more formally taught in medical education pathways. Future directions for professionalism in surgery include validated modules, more formalized surgeon review, linkage to credentialing, and reimbursement.

外科专业精神回顾。
内科医生,特别是外科医生,对职业精神有着独特的期望和责任。此外,外科医生还与多个不同的群体打交道,包括外科同行、受训人员、其他医生、辅助护理合作伙伴和患者。所有这些群体之间的沟通都必须是尊重、适当和有效的,即使是在高压力的手术环境中。职业行为规范正在不断演变,以反映当今时代的实践以及日益多样化的外科队伍。因此,多个外科协会以及毕业后医学教育认证委员会已将职业精神作为外科医生评估的核心支柱。虽然职业精神通常是以身作则,但现在医学教育途径中更多地正式教授了这一特质。外科专业精神的未来发展方向包括验证模块、更正式的外科医生审查、与资格认证挂钩以及报销。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
245
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信