Social Interaction and Online Learning Efficiency for Middle School Students: The Mediating Role of Social Presence and Learning Engagement.

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Fangfang Gao, Chunzhen Wang, Han Xie, Jianzhong Hong
{"title":"Social Interaction and Online Learning Efficiency for Middle School Students: The Mediating Role of Social Presence and Learning Engagement.","authors":"Fangfang Gao, Chunzhen Wang, Han Xie, Jianzhong Hong","doi":"10.3390/bs14100896","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>(1) learning efficiency is recognized as the ultimate goal of online education, as it is related to the quality of online education and the cognitive development of students and is influenced by social interactions. This study explores the mediating roles of social presence and learning engagement in the relationship between social interaction and online learning efficiency, addressing gaps in prior studies that have not yet identified the underlying mechanisms. (2) students from three middle schools (N = 344; M<sub>age</sub> = 13.61; 56.68% women) completed self-report questionnaires regarding social interaction, social presence, learning engagement, and learning efficiency. (3) the study findings reveal significant serial mediation effects of social presence and learning engagement in the relationship between learner-instructor and learner-learner interactions and learning efficiency. Specifically, while the indirect effect of learner-instructor interaction through social presence alone (indirect effect = 0.08, 95% CI = [-0.00, 0.17]) was not significant, the pathways through learning engagement (indirect effect = 0.18, 95% CI = [0.11, 0.26]) and the combined mediation through both social presence and learning engagement (indirect effect = 0.06, 95% CI = [0.03, 0.09]) were statistically significant. Similarly, for learner-learner interaction, the indirect effects through social presence (indirect effect = 0.09, 0.17) and learning engagement (indirect effect = 0.17, 95% CI = [0.11, 0.24]) were significant, as was the serial mediation through both mediators (indirect effect = 0.07, 95% CI = [0.04, 0.11]). (4) social presence and learning engagement played crucial mediating roles in the links between social interactions and online learning efficiency, and the predictive efficacy of learner-learner and learner-instructor interactions on online learning efficiency was found to be unequal.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11505076/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14100896","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

(1) learning efficiency is recognized as the ultimate goal of online education, as it is related to the quality of online education and the cognitive development of students and is influenced by social interactions. This study explores the mediating roles of social presence and learning engagement in the relationship between social interaction and online learning efficiency, addressing gaps in prior studies that have not yet identified the underlying mechanisms. (2) students from three middle schools (N = 344; Mage = 13.61; 56.68% women) completed self-report questionnaires regarding social interaction, social presence, learning engagement, and learning efficiency. (3) the study findings reveal significant serial mediation effects of social presence and learning engagement in the relationship between learner-instructor and learner-learner interactions and learning efficiency. Specifically, while the indirect effect of learner-instructor interaction through social presence alone (indirect effect = 0.08, 95% CI = [-0.00, 0.17]) was not significant, the pathways through learning engagement (indirect effect = 0.18, 95% CI = [0.11, 0.26]) and the combined mediation through both social presence and learning engagement (indirect effect = 0.06, 95% CI = [0.03, 0.09]) were statistically significant. Similarly, for learner-learner interaction, the indirect effects through social presence (indirect effect = 0.09, 0.17) and learning engagement (indirect effect = 0.17, 95% CI = [0.11, 0.24]) were significant, as was the serial mediation through both mediators (indirect effect = 0.07, 95% CI = [0.04, 0.11]). (4) social presence and learning engagement played crucial mediating roles in the links between social interactions and online learning efficiency, and the predictive efficacy of learner-learner and learner-instructor interactions on online learning efficiency was found to be unequal.

初中生的社交互动与在线学习效率:社交存在感和学习参与的中介作用。
(1) 学习效率被认为是在线教育的终极目标,因为它关系到在线教育的质量和学生的认知发展,并受社交互动的影响。本研究探讨了社交存在和学习参与在社交互动与在线学习效率关系中的中介作用,弥补了以往研究尚未明确内在机制的不足。(2) 来自三所中学的学生(N = 344;Mage = 13.61;56.68%为女性)完成了有关社交互动、社交存在、学习参与和学习效率的自我报告问卷。(3) 研究结果显示,在学习者与教师、学习者与学习者之间的互动与学习效率的关系中,社会存在和学习投入具有显著的序列中介效应。具体地说,虽然学习者-指导者互动仅通过社会存在的间接效应(间接效应=0.08,95% CI=[-0.00,0.17])不显著,但通过学习参与的途径(间接效应=0.18,95% CI=[0.11,0.26])以及通过社会存在和学习参与的综合中介效应(间接效应=0.06,95% CI=[0.03,0.09])在统计上是显著的。同样,对于学习者与学习者之间的交互作用,通过社交存在(间接效应 = 0.09,0.17)和学习投入(间接效应 = 0.17,95% CI = [0.11,0.24])产生的间接效应以及通过这两个中介因素产生的串联中介效应(间接效应 = 0.07,95% CI = [0.04,0.11])也具有显著性。(4)社会存在和学习参与在社会交往与在线学习效率之间的联系中起着关键的中介作用,学习者-学习者和学习者-指导者之间的互动对在线学习效率的预测效果不均等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信