Reassess Hospital Costs and Mortality Between Myocardial Infarction With and Without ST-Segment Elevation in a Modern Context

IF 1.1 4区医学 Q4 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS

Annals of Noninvasive Electrocardiology Pub Date : 2024-10-26 DOI:10.1111/anec.70027

Honglan Ma, Sen Wu, Jinlong Cao, Tianzhi Cai

{"title":"Reassess Hospital Costs and Mortality Between Myocardial Infarction With and Without ST-Segment Elevation in a Modern Context","authors":"Honglan Ma, Sen Wu, Jinlong Cao, Tianzhi Cai","doi":"10.1111/anec.70027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) may have higher hospitalization costs and poorer prognosis than non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A single-center retrospective study was conducted on 758 STEMI patients and 386 NSTEMI patients from January 1, 2020 to May 30, 2023 aimed to investigate the differences in cost and mortality.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>STEMI patients had higher maximal troponin I (15,222.5 (27.18, 40,000.00) vs. 2731.5 (10.73, 27,857.25), <i>p</i> < 0.001) and lower left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (56% (53%, 59%) vs. 57% (55%, 59%), <i>p</i> < 0.001) compared to NSTEMI patients. The clinical symptoms were mainly persistent or interrupted chest pain/distress in either STEMI or NSTEMI patients. STEMI patients had a significantly higher risk of combined hypotension than NSTEMI patients (8.97% vs. 3.89%, <i>p =</i> 0.002), and IABP was much more frequently used in the STEMI group with a statistical difference (2.90% vs. 0.52%, <i>p =</i> 0.015). STEMI patients have statistically higher hospitalization costs (RMB, ¥) (31,667 (25,337.79, 39,790) vs. 30,506.91 (21,405.96, 40,233.75), <i>p = 0.006</i>) and longer hospitalization days (10 (8, 11) vs. 9 (8, 11), <i>p = 0.001</i>) compared to NSTEMI patients. Although in-hospital mortality was higher in STEMI patients, the difference was not statistically significant (3.56% vs. 2.07%, <i>p = 0.167</i>). Multivariable logistic regression was performed and found that systolic blood pressure and NT-proBNP were risk factors for patient death (OR ≥ 1).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>STEMI patients are more likely comorbid cardiogenic shock, heart failure complications with higher hospitalization costs and longer hospitalization days. And relatively more use of acute mechanical circulatory support devices such as IABP.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Trial Registration</h3>\n \n <p>ChiCTR2300077885</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":8074,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Noninvasive Electrocardiology","volume":"29 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11512201/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Noninvasive Electrocardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/anec.70027","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) may have higher hospitalization costs and poorer prognosis than non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI).

Methods

A single-center retrospective study was conducted on 758 STEMI patients and 386 NSTEMI patients from January 1, 2020 to May 30, 2023 aimed to investigate the differences in cost and mortality.

Results

STEMI patients had higher maximal troponin I (15,222.5 (27.18, 40,000.00) vs. 2731.5 (10.73, 27,857.25), p < 0.001) and lower left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (56% (53%, 59%) vs. 57% (55%, 59%), p < 0.001) compared to NSTEMI patients. The clinical symptoms were mainly persistent or interrupted chest pain/distress in either STEMI or NSTEMI patients. STEMI patients had a significantly higher risk of combined hypotension than NSTEMI patients (8.97% vs. 3.89%, p = 0.002), and IABP was much more frequently used in the STEMI group with a statistical difference (2.90% vs. 0.52%, p = 0.015). STEMI patients have statistically higher hospitalization costs (RMB, ¥) (31,667 (25,337.79, 39,790) vs. 30,506.91 (21,405.96, 40,233.75), p = 0.006) and longer hospitalization days (10 (8, 11) vs. 9 (8, 11), p = 0.001) compared to NSTEMI patients. Although in-hospital mortality was higher in STEMI patients, the difference was not statistically significant (3.56% vs. 2.07%, p = 0.167). Multivariable logistic regression was performed and found that systolic blood pressure and NT-proBNP were risk factors for patient death (OR ≥ 1).

Conclusion

STEMI patients are more likely comorbid cardiogenic shock, heart failure complications with higher hospitalization costs and longer hospitalization days. And relatively more use of acute mechanical circulatory support devices such as IABP.

Trial Registration

ChiCTR2300077885

Abstract Image

查看原文本刊更多论文

在现代背景下，重新评估有 ST 段抬高和无 ST 段抬高心肌梗死之间的医院成本和死亡率。

背景：与非ST段抬高型心肌梗死（NSTEMI）相比，ST段抬高型心肌梗死（STEMI）患者的住院费用可能更高，预后更差：2020年1月1日至2023年5月30日期间，对758名STEMI患者和386名NSTEMI患者进行了单中心回顾性研究，旨在调查成本和死亡率的差异：STEMI 患者的最大肌钙蛋白 I 较高（15222.5（27.18，40000.00）vs 2731.5（10.73，27857.25），P 结论：STEMI 患者更容易合并其他并发症：STEMI 患者更容易合并心源性休克、心衰并发症，住院费用更高，住院天数更长。使用急性机械循环支持装置（如 IABP）的人数相对较多：ChiCTR2300077885。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Annals of Noninvasive Electrocardiology 医学-心血管系统

CiteScore

3.40

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

6-12 weeks

期刊介绍： The ANNALS OF NONINVASIVE ELECTROCARDIOLOGY (A.N.E) is an online only journal that incorporates ongoing advances in the clinical application and technology of traditional and new ECG-based techniques in the diagnosis and treatment of cardiac patients. ANE is the first journal in an evolving subspecialty that incorporates ongoing advances in the clinical application and technology of traditional and new ECG-based techniques in the diagnosis and treatment of cardiac patients. The publication includes topics related to 12-lead, exercise and high-resolution electrocardiography, arrhythmias, ischemia, repolarization phenomena, heart rate variability, circadian rhythms, bioengineering technology, signal-averaged ECGs, T-wave alternans and automatic external defibrillation. ANE publishes peer-reviewed articles of interest to clinicians and researchers in the field of noninvasive electrocardiology. Original research, clinical studies, state-of-the-art reviews, case reports, technical notes, and letters to the editors will be published to meet future demands in this field.