Parasitic plants show striking convergence in host preference across angiosperm lineages.

IF 3.6 2区 生物学 Q1 PLANT SCIENCES
Sebastian A Hatt, Olwen M Grace, Alex R Zuntini, Duncan D Cameron, Chris J Thorogood
{"title":"Parasitic plants show striking convergence in host preference across angiosperm lineages.","authors":"Sebastian A Hatt, Olwen M Grace, Alex R Zuntini, Duncan D Cameron, Chris J Thorogood","doi":"10.1093/aob/mcae180","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>The host specificity of a parasite underpins its ecology, distribution, invasive potential and adaptability, yet for most parasitic plants host ranges are poorly understood. We examine host-parasite relationships across lineages to infer how host specificity may have influenced the evolution of parasitism in plants.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Host preference data for all plant holoparasite species were manually collected from literature and herbarium specimens, then analysed to investigate and visualise host diversity and specificity.</p><p><strong>Key results: </strong>We reveal a disproportionality in host preference across host lineages: the Asteraceae contains 10% of angiosperm diversity but is infected by 31% of parasite species; meanwhile Monocots comprise 23% but are infected by just 3.2%. Furthermore, we observe striking convergence in host preference: Asteraceae, Euphorbiaceae and Fabaceae are infected by six, five and four independent parasite lineages, respectively. We also demonstrate considerable variation in the degree of host specificity among closely related parasite species; a result that does not reflect the expectation of holoparasites - especially endoparasites - as host specialists.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The marked pattern of convergence in preference across disparate lineages points to a common pathway in the evolution of parasitism of eudicots in preference to monocots, which may have in turn have been driven by a divergence in host root and vascular architecture. The unexpected variation in host specificity among closely related species suggests that even apparent generalists may comprise cryptic host-specific taxa. This highlights the value of host preference as an additional consideration in parasitic plant taxonomy. Together, our data point to a complex interplay between ecological and physiological factors driving the evolution of host-parasite interactions. Moreover, they emphasize how little is known about the ecology of most holoparasitic plants, a group of organisms that are especially vulnerable at a time of unprecedented biodiversity loss and extinction.</p>","PeriodicalId":8023,"journal":{"name":"Annals of botany","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of botany","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcae180","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims: The host specificity of a parasite underpins its ecology, distribution, invasive potential and adaptability, yet for most parasitic plants host ranges are poorly understood. We examine host-parasite relationships across lineages to infer how host specificity may have influenced the evolution of parasitism in plants.

Methods: Host preference data for all plant holoparasite species were manually collected from literature and herbarium specimens, then analysed to investigate and visualise host diversity and specificity.

Key results: We reveal a disproportionality in host preference across host lineages: the Asteraceae contains 10% of angiosperm diversity but is infected by 31% of parasite species; meanwhile Monocots comprise 23% but are infected by just 3.2%. Furthermore, we observe striking convergence in host preference: Asteraceae, Euphorbiaceae and Fabaceae are infected by six, five and four independent parasite lineages, respectively. We also demonstrate considerable variation in the degree of host specificity among closely related parasite species; a result that does not reflect the expectation of holoparasites - especially endoparasites - as host specialists.

Conclusions: The marked pattern of convergence in preference across disparate lineages points to a common pathway in the evolution of parasitism of eudicots in preference to monocots, which may have in turn have been driven by a divergence in host root and vascular architecture. The unexpected variation in host specificity among closely related species suggests that even apparent generalists may comprise cryptic host-specific taxa. This highlights the value of host preference as an additional consideration in parasitic plant taxonomy. Together, our data point to a complex interplay between ecological and physiological factors driving the evolution of host-parasite interactions. Moreover, they emphasize how little is known about the ecology of most holoparasitic plants, a group of organisms that are especially vulnerable at a time of unprecedented biodiversity loss and extinction.

寄生植物在寄主偏好方面表现出惊人的趋同性。
背景和目的:寄生虫的寄主特异性是其生态学、分布、入侵潜力和适应性的基础,然而对于大多数寄生植物的寄主范围却知之甚少。方法:从文献和标本馆标本中人工收集所有植物全寄生物种的寄主偏好数据,然后进行分析,以研究和直观展示寄主的多样性和特异性:关键结果:我们揭示了不同寄主种系对寄主偏好的比例失调:菊科占被子植物多样性的 10%,但却被 31% 的寄生虫物种所感染;而单子叶植物占 23%,但却只有 3.2% 被寄生虫所感染。此外,我们还观察到寄主偏好的惊人趋同:菊科、大戟科和豆科分别被六个、五个和四个独立的寄生虫品系所感染。我们还发现,亲缘关系密切的寄生虫物种之间的寄主专一性差异很大;这一结果并不反映全寄生虫(尤其是内寄生虫)作为寄主专家的预期:结论:不同种系的寄生虫对寄主的偏好明显趋同,这表明在寄生于裸子植物而非单子叶植物的进化过程中存在一条共同的途径,而寄主根系和维管结构的差异又可能是这一进化的驱动力。近缘物种之间寄主特异性的意外差异表明,即使是明显的通性物种也可能包括隐蔽的寄主特异性类群。这凸显了寄主偏好作为寄生植物分类中额外考虑因素的价值。总之,我们的数据表明,生态和生理因素之间存在着复杂的相互作用,推动着宿主与寄生虫之间相互作用的进化。此外,这些数据还强调了人们对大多数全寄生植物的生态学知之甚少,而在生物多样性空前丧失和灭绝的今天,这类生物显得尤为脆弱。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of botany
Annals of botany 生物-植物科学
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
4.80%
发文量
138
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Annals of Botany is an international plant science journal publishing novel and rigorous research in all areas of plant science. It is published monthly in both electronic and printed forms with at least two extra issues each year that focus on a particular theme in plant biology. The Journal is managed by the Annals of Botany Company, a not-for-profit educational charity established to promote plant science worldwide. The Journal publishes original research papers, invited and submitted review articles, ''Research in Context'' expanding on original work, ''Botanical Briefings'' as short overviews of important topics, and ''Viewpoints'' giving opinions. All papers in each issue are summarized briefly in Content Snapshots , there are topical news items in the Plant Cuttings section and Book Reviews . A rigorous review process ensures that readers are exposed to genuine and novel advances across a wide spectrum of botanical knowledge. All papers aim to advance knowledge and make a difference to our understanding of plant science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信