Head-to-head comparison of 68 Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT, 18F-FDG PET/CT, and contrast-enhanced CT for the detection of various tumors.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Masao Watanabe, Wolfgang P Fendler, Hong Grafe, Nader Hirmas, Rainer Hamacher, Helena Lanzafame, Kim M Pabst, Hubertus Hautzel, Clemens Aigner, Stefan Kasper, Bastian von Tresckow, Martin Stuschke, Sherko Kümmel, Celine Lugnier, Boris Hadaschik, Viktor Grünwald, Fadi Zarrad, David Kersting, Jens T Siveke, Ken Herrmann, Manuel Weber
{"title":"Head-to-head comparison of <sup>68</sup> Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT, <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT, and contrast-enhanced CT for the detection of various tumors.","authors":"Masao Watanabe, Wolfgang P Fendler, Hong Grafe, Nader Hirmas, Rainer Hamacher, Helena Lanzafame, Kim M Pabst, Hubertus Hautzel, Clemens Aigner, Stefan Kasper, Bastian von Tresckow, Martin Stuschke, Sherko Kümmel, Celine Lugnier, Boris Hadaschik, Viktor Grünwald, Fadi Zarrad, David Kersting, Jens T Siveke, Ken Herrmann, Manuel Weber","doi":"10.1007/s12149-024-01993-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>FAPI-PET/CT exhibits high tumor uptake and low background accumulation, enabling high-sensitivity tumor detection. We compared the diagnostic performance of <sup>68</sup> Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT plus contrast-enhanced CT (CE-CT), <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT plus CE-CT, and standalone CE-CT in patients with various malignancies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>232 patients underwent <sup>68</sup> Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT,<sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT, and CE-CT each within 4 weeks. Detection rates were assessed by a blinded reader, with ≥ 2 weeks between scans of the same patient to avoid recall bias. A sub-analysis of diagnostic performance was performed for 490 histopathologically validated lesions. Detection rates were compared using McNemar's test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Lesion-based detection rates in <sup>68</sup> Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT plus CE-CT, <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT plus CE-CT, and CE-CT alone were 91.2% (1540/1688), 82.5% (1393/1688) and 60.2% (1016/1688). The detection rates were significantly higher for <sup>68</sup> Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT plus CE-CT than for <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT plus CE-CT (p < 0.02 for primary lesions and p < 0.001 for total, abdominopelvic nodal, liver and other visceral lesions) and CE-CT (p < 0.0001 for total, primary, cervicothoracic nodal, abdominopelvic nodal, liver, other visceral, and bone lesions). In the sub-analysis, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value, and accuracy were 61.3%, 96.7%, 81.4%, 91.4% and 90.0% for <sup>68</sup> Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT plus CE-CT, 57.0%, 95.7%, 75.7%, 90.5% and 88.4% for <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT plus CE-CT, and 51.6%, 97.2%, 81.4%, 89.6% and 88.6% for CECT, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong><sup>68</sup> Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT plus CE-CT demonstrates a higher tumor detection rate than <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT plus CE-CT and CE-CT in a diverse spectrum of malignancies, especially for primary, abdominopelvic nodal, liver, and other visceral lesions. Further studies on which entities draw particular benefit from <sup>68</sup> Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT are warranted to aid appropriate diagnostic workup.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>A total of N = 232 patients were analyzed. Of these, N = 50 patients were included in a prospective interventional trial (NCT05160051), and N = 175 in a prospective observational trial (NCT04571086) for correlation and clinical follow-up of PET findings; N = 7 patients were analyzed retrospectively.</p>","PeriodicalId":8007,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Nuclear Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Nuclear Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12149-024-01993-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: FAPI-PET/CT exhibits high tumor uptake and low background accumulation, enabling high-sensitivity tumor detection. We compared the diagnostic performance of 68 Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT plus contrast-enhanced CT (CE-CT), 18F-FDG PET/CT plus CE-CT, and standalone CE-CT in patients with various malignancies.

Methods: 232 patients underwent 68 Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT,18F-FDG PET/CT, and CE-CT each within 4 weeks. Detection rates were assessed by a blinded reader, with ≥ 2 weeks between scans of the same patient to avoid recall bias. A sub-analysis of diagnostic performance was performed for 490 histopathologically validated lesions. Detection rates were compared using McNemar's test.

Results: Lesion-based detection rates in 68 Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT plus CE-CT, 18F-FDG PET/CT plus CE-CT, and CE-CT alone were 91.2% (1540/1688), 82.5% (1393/1688) and 60.2% (1016/1688). The detection rates were significantly higher for 68 Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT plus CE-CT than for 18F-FDG PET/CT plus CE-CT (p < 0.02 for primary lesions and p < 0.001 for total, abdominopelvic nodal, liver and other visceral lesions) and CE-CT (p < 0.0001 for total, primary, cervicothoracic nodal, abdominopelvic nodal, liver, other visceral, and bone lesions). In the sub-analysis, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value, and accuracy were 61.3%, 96.7%, 81.4%, 91.4% and 90.0% for 68 Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT plus CE-CT, 57.0%, 95.7%, 75.7%, 90.5% and 88.4% for 18F-FDG PET/CT plus CE-CT, and 51.6%, 97.2%, 81.4%, 89.6% and 88.6% for CECT, respectively.

Conclusions: 68 Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT plus CE-CT demonstrates a higher tumor detection rate than 18F-FDG PET/CT plus CE-CT and CE-CT in a diverse spectrum of malignancies, especially for primary, abdominopelvic nodal, liver, and other visceral lesions. Further studies on which entities draw particular benefit from 68 Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT are warranted to aid appropriate diagnostic workup.

Trial registration: A total of N = 232 patients were analyzed. Of these, N = 50 patients were included in a prospective interventional trial (NCT05160051), and N = 175 in a prospective observational trial (NCT04571086) for correlation and clinical follow-up of PET findings; N = 7 patients were analyzed retrospectively.

68 Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT、18F-FDG PET/CT 和对比增强 CT 在检测各种肿瘤方面的头对头比较。
目的:FAPI-PET/CT具有高肿瘤摄取和低背景累积的特点,可实现高灵敏度的肿瘤检测。我们比较了 68 Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT 加对比增强 CT(CE-CT)、18F-FDG PET/CT 加 CE-CT 和独立 CE-CT 对各种恶性肿瘤患者的诊断性能。检测率由一名盲读者评估,同一患者的扫描间隔≥2周,以避免回忆偏差。对 490 个经组织病理学验证的病变进行了诊断性能子分析。采用麦克尼马检验比较了检出率:68 Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT 加 CE-CT、18F-FDG PET/CT 加 CE-CT 和单独 CE-CT 基于病灶的检出率分别为 91.2%(1540/1688)、82.5%(1393/1688)和 60.2%(1016/1688)。68 Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT 加 CE-CT 的检出率明显高于 18F-FDG PET/CT 加 CE-CT (P 68 Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT 加 CE-CT、18F-FDG PET/CT 加 CE-CT 分别为 57.0%、95.7%、75.7%、90.5% 和 88.4%,CECT 分别为 51.6%、97.2%、81.4%、89.6% 和 88.6%):68Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT加CE-CT在多种恶性肿瘤中的肿瘤检出率高于18F-FDG PET/CT加CE-CT和CE-CT,尤其是在原发性、腹盆腔结节、肝脏和其他内脏病变中。有必要进一步研究哪些实体可从 68 Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT 中特别获益,以帮助进行适当的诊断工作:共分析了 N = 232 名患者。其中,N = 50 例患者被纳入前瞻性介入试验(NCT05160051),N = 175 例患者被纳入前瞻性观察试验(NCT04571086),以对 PET 结果进行相关性分析和临床随访;N = 7 例患者被进行回顾性分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Nuclear Medicine
Annals of Nuclear Medicine 医学-核医学
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
7.70%
发文量
111
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Annals of Nuclear Medicine is an official journal of the Japanese Society of Nuclear Medicine. It develops the appropriate application of radioactive substances and stable nuclides in the field of medicine. The journal promotes the exchange of ideas and information and research in nuclear medicine and includes the medical application of radionuclides and related subjects. It presents original articles, short communications, reviews and letters to the editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信