COVID-19 and Health-care Business Continuity in Africa: Perceptions of Risks and Vulnerabilities by Mid-level Management Staff in a Tertiary Care Hospital.

IF 0.6 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Mokogwu Ndubuisi, Obehi Aituaje Akoria, Darlington Ewaen Obaseki, Oko-Oboh Agbonvihele Gregrey
{"title":"COVID-19 and Health-care Business Continuity in Africa: Perceptions of Risks and Vulnerabilities by Mid-level Management Staff in a Tertiary Care Hospital.","authors":"Mokogwu Ndubuisi, Obehi Aituaje Akoria, Darlington Ewaen Obaseki, Oko-Oboh Agbonvihele Gregrey","doi":"10.4103/aam.aam_145_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The novel SARS-CoV-2 outbreak disrupted businesses globally and created fears in the general public and among health-care professionals. Almost universally, considerations about the coronavirus pandemic and its effects became priority in the daily operations of businesses, leaving hitherto pressing concerns in the back stage. Early in the pandemic, the management of University of Benin Teaching Hospital set up a Business Continuity Team which undertook an evaluation of the perceptions of mid-level hospital managers about their departments' and units' risks and vulnerabilities in the face of the ongoing pandemic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A modified International Labour Organization (ILO) risk profile self-assessment tool which focused on \"people,\" \"processes,\" \"profits,\" and \"partnerships\" was used to assess mid-level managers' perceptions of their respective departments' and units' risks and vulnerabilities, consequent on the COVID-19 pandemic. Responses were obtained from heads of departments and units using an online survey. Final scores were divided into terciles (three equal groups) in respect of perceived risks and adverse outcomes of the COVID-19 pandemic. Scores in the lower tercile were grouped as low risk/vulnerability, the middle group of scores as medium risk/vulnerability, and scores in the upper tercile as high risk/vulnerability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Responses were obtained from 35 (49.3%) of the 71 clinical and nonclinical departments and units in the hospital. Fifteen of these (42.9%) were clinical. Nineteen (54.2%) departments were assessed to be at high risk/vulnerability, 9 (47.4%) of which were clinical. Twelve (34.3%) departments were assessed to be at medium risk/vulnerability - 4 (33.3%) of them, clinical. No department was assessed to be at low risk. The highest risk ratings were in the domains of \"profits\" and \"partnerships:\" 54 (84.4%) mid-level managers assessed their departments and units to be at high risk of the negative impacts of the coronavirus pandemic with respect to \"profits\" and 51 (79.7%) with respect to \"partnerships.\"</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Mid-level managers in clinical and nonclinical departments and units assessed their departments and units to be at medium and high risk of the negative impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic, using the ILO's modified tool. Our findings enabled the management of the hospital and the Business Continuity Team to address the specific areas of concerns that were highlighted, develop contingency plans, and frame risk communication during the pandemic, with a view to fostering increased sense of safety in the workforce. This approach to risk assessment is repeatable, and we recommended it to other hospitals in Africa.</p>","PeriodicalId":7938,"journal":{"name":"Annals of African Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of African Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/aam.aam_145_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The novel SARS-CoV-2 outbreak disrupted businesses globally and created fears in the general public and among health-care professionals. Almost universally, considerations about the coronavirus pandemic and its effects became priority in the daily operations of businesses, leaving hitherto pressing concerns in the back stage. Early in the pandemic, the management of University of Benin Teaching Hospital set up a Business Continuity Team which undertook an evaluation of the perceptions of mid-level hospital managers about their departments' and units' risks and vulnerabilities in the face of the ongoing pandemic.

Methods: A modified International Labour Organization (ILO) risk profile self-assessment tool which focused on "people," "processes," "profits," and "partnerships" was used to assess mid-level managers' perceptions of their respective departments' and units' risks and vulnerabilities, consequent on the COVID-19 pandemic. Responses were obtained from heads of departments and units using an online survey. Final scores were divided into terciles (three equal groups) in respect of perceived risks and adverse outcomes of the COVID-19 pandemic. Scores in the lower tercile were grouped as low risk/vulnerability, the middle group of scores as medium risk/vulnerability, and scores in the upper tercile as high risk/vulnerability.

Results: Responses were obtained from 35 (49.3%) of the 71 clinical and nonclinical departments and units in the hospital. Fifteen of these (42.9%) were clinical. Nineteen (54.2%) departments were assessed to be at high risk/vulnerability, 9 (47.4%) of which were clinical. Twelve (34.3%) departments were assessed to be at medium risk/vulnerability - 4 (33.3%) of them, clinical. No department was assessed to be at low risk. The highest risk ratings were in the domains of "profits" and "partnerships:" 54 (84.4%) mid-level managers assessed their departments and units to be at high risk of the negative impacts of the coronavirus pandemic with respect to "profits" and 51 (79.7%) with respect to "partnerships."

Conclusion: Mid-level managers in clinical and nonclinical departments and units assessed their departments and units to be at medium and high risk of the negative impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic, using the ILO's modified tool. Our findings enabled the management of the hospital and the Business Continuity Team to address the specific areas of concerns that were highlighted, develop contingency plans, and frame risk communication during the pandemic, with a view to fostering increased sense of safety in the workforce. This approach to risk assessment is repeatable, and we recommended it to other hospitals in Africa.

COVID-19 与非洲医疗保健业务连续性:一家三级医院的中层管理人员对风险和脆弱性的看法。
目的:新型 SARS-CoV-2 的爆发扰乱了全球的商业活动,在公众和医疗保健专业人员中造成了恐慌。几乎所有企业在日常运营中都优先考虑冠状病毒大流行及其影响,而把之前紧迫的问题放在了次要位置。大流行初期,贝宁大学教学医院管理层成立了一个业务连续性小组,负责评估医院中层管理人员对其部门和单位在大流行面前的风险和脆弱性的看法:方法:使用国际劳工组织(ILO)的一种经过修改的风险状况自我评估工具,重点评估 "人员"、"流程"、"利润 "和 "合作伙伴关系",以评估中层管理人员对各自部门和单位在 COVID-19 大流行病中的风险和脆弱性的看法。各部门和单位负责人通过在线调查做出了答复。根据对 COVID-19 大流行的风险和不利后果的感知,最终得分被分为三等分(三个相等的组别)。得分较低的三等分组为低风险/易受感染组,得分中等的一组为中风险/易受感染组,得分较高的一组为高风险/易受感染组:在医院的 71 个临床和非临床部门和单位中,有 35 个(49.3%)做出了答复。其中 15 个(42.9%)是临床科室。19个(54.2%)科室被评估为高风险/易受伤害科室,其中9个(47.4%)为临床科室。12个(34.3%)科室被评估为中度风险/易受攻击,其中4个(33.3%)为临床科室。没有一个部门被评估为低风险。风险评级最高的是 "利润 "和 "伙伴关系 "领域:"54名(84.4%)中层管理人员认为其所在部门和单位在 "利润 "和 "合作关系 "方面面临冠状病毒大流行负面影响的高风险,51名(79.7%)认为其所在部门和单位面临冠状病毒大流行负面影响的高风险:临床和非临床科室和单位的中层管理人员使用国际劳工组织修改过的工具,评估了其所在科室和单位受 COVID-19 大流行负面影响的中度和高度风险。我们的评估结果使医院管理层和业务连续性小组能够解决突出的具体关切领域,制定应急计划,并在大流行病期间进行风险沟通,以增强员工的安全感。这种风险评估方法可以重复使用,我们向非洲的其他医院推荐了这种方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of African Medicine
Annals of African Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
期刊介绍: The Annals of African Medicine is published by the Usmanu Danfodiyo University Teaching Hospital, Sokoto, Nigeria and the Annals of African Medicine Society. The Journal is intended to serve as a medium for the publication of research findings in the broad field of Medicine in Africa and other developing countries, and elsewhere which have relevance to Africa. It will serve as a source of information on the state of the art of Medicine in Africa, for continuing education for doctors in Africa and other developing countries, and also for the publication of meetings and conferences. The journal will publish articles I any field of Medicine and other fields which have relevance or implications for Medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信