Virologically suppressed switch to Dolutegravir/Lamivudine 2-Drug regimen versus switch to commonly prescribed 3-Drug regimens in the United States.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Gerald Pierone, Jennifer S Fusco, Laurence Brunet, Vani Vannappagari, Supriya Sarkar, Cassidy E Henegar, Jean van Wyk, Michael B Wohlfeiler, Anthony Mills, Gregory P Fusco
{"title":"Virologically suppressed switch to Dolutegravir/Lamivudine 2-Drug regimen versus switch to commonly prescribed 3-Drug regimens in the United States.","authors":"Gerald Pierone, Jennifer S Fusco, Laurence Brunet, Vani Vannappagari, Supriya Sarkar, Cassidy E Henegar, Jean van Wyk, Michael B Wohlfeiler, Anthony Mills, Gregory P Fusco","doi":"10.1186/s12981-024-00668-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Two-drug regimens (2DRs) have been introduced in recent years to potentially reduce antiretroviral therapy (ART) toxicities and drug-drug interactions while demonstrating comparable efficacy to three-drug regimens (3DRs) for people with HIV (PWH). The objective of this study was to compare the real-world effectiveness and durability of a single-tablet 2DR of dolutegravir/lamivudine (DTG/3TC) with that of commonly prescribed 3DRs in ART-experienced, virologically suppressed PWH during the first 24 months of DTG/3TC availability in the United States.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Virologically suppressed (viral load [VL] < 200 copies/mL) adult PWH initiating DTG/3TC 2DR, bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (BIC/FTC/TAF), or a DTG-based 3DR between 01MAY2019 and 31OCT2020 were identified in the OPERA<sup>®</sup> cohort and followed through 30APR2021. Univariate Poisson regression (incidence rates) and marginal structural Cox proportional hazards models with inverse probability of treatment weights (hazard ratios) were used to quantify relationships between regimen type and confirmed virologic failure (2 consecutive VLs ≥ 200 copies/mL) or regimen discontinuation. Reasons for discontinuation were examined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 8,037 ART-experienced, virologically suppressed PWH met the inclusion criteria and switched to DTG/3TC (n = 1,450), BIC/FTC/TAF (n = 5,691), or a DTG-based 3DR (n = 896). Incidence rates of confirmed virologic failure were low for all groups, at 0.66 (DTG/3TC), 0.84 (BIC/FTC/TAF), and 1.78 (DTG 3DR) per 100 person-years (py). Compared to DTG/3TC, only the DTG 3DRs were associated with a statistically significant increased hazard of confirmed virologic failure (hazard ratio: 5.21, 95% confidence interval: 1.85, 14.67). Discontinuation rates per 100 py were highest in the DTG 3DR group (24.90), followed by the DTG/3TC group (17.69) and the BIC/FTC/TAF group (8.30). Regardless of regimen, discontinuations were infrequently attributed to effectiveness (VL ≥ 200 copies/mL; 4%) or tolerability (adverse diagnoses, side effects, or lab abnormalities; 6%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among virologically suppressed PWH initiating a new regimen, few individuals experienced virologic failure in real-world clinical care. While rates of regimen discontinuation were high, most discontinuations could not be attributed to a lack of virologic control or poor tolerability. These findings suggest that DTG/3TC is an effective option for ART-experienced, virologically suppressed PWH.</p>","PeriodicalId":7503,"journal":{"name":"AIDS Research and Therapy","volume":"21 1","pages":"76"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11515283/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AIDS Research and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12981-024-00668-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Two-drug regimens (2DRs) have been introduced in recent years to potentially reduce antiretroviral therapy (ART) toxicities and drug-drug interactions while demonstrating comparable efficacy to three-drug regimens (3DRs) for people with HIV (PWH). The objective of this study was to compare the real-world effectiveness and durability of a single-tablet 2DR of dolutegravir/lamivudine (DTG/3TC) with that of commonly prescribed 3DRs in ART-experienced, virologically suppressed PWH during the first 24 months of DTG/3TC availability in the United States.

Methods: Virologically suppressed (viral load [VL] < 200 copies/mL) adult PWH initiating DTG/3TC 2DR, bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (BIC/FTC/TAF), or a DTG-based 3DR between 01MAY2019 and 31OCT2020 were identified in the OPERA® cohort and followed through 30APR2021. Univariate Poisson regression (incidence rates) and marginal structural Cox proportional hazards models with inverse probability of treatment weights (hazard ratios) were used to quantify relationships between regimen type and confirmed virologic failure (2 consecutive VLs ≥ 200 copies/mL) or regimen discontinuation. Reasons for discontinuation were examined.

Results: A total of 8,037 ART-experienced, virologically suppressed PWH met the inclusion criteria and switched to DTG/3TC (n = 1,450), BIC/FTC/TAF (n = 5,691), or a DTG-based 3DR (n = 896). Incidence rates of confirmed virologic failure were low for all groups, at 0.66 (DTG/3TC), 0.84 (BIC/FTC/TAF), and 1.78 (DTG 3DR) per 100 person-years (py). Compared to DTG/3TC, only the DTG 3DRs were associated with a statistically significant increased hazard of confirmed virologic failure (hazard ratio: 5.21, 95% confidence interval: 1.85, 14.67). Discontinuation rates per 100 py were highest in the DTG 3DR group (24.90), followed by the DTG/3TC group (17.69) and the BIC/FTC/TAF group (8.30). Regardless of regimen, discontinuations were infrequently attributed to effectiveness (VL ≥ 200 copies/mL; 4%) or tolerability (adverse diagnoses, side effects, or lab abnormalities; 6%).

Conclusions: Among virologically suppressed PWH initiating a new regimen, few individuals experienced virologic failure in real-world clinical care. While rates of regimen discontinuation were high, most discontinuations could not be attributed to a lack of virologic control or poor tolerability. These findings suggest that DTG/3TC is an effective option for ART-experienced, virologically suppressed PWH.

在美国,病毒被抑制后改用多鲁曲韦/拉米夫定两药方案与改用常用的三药方案。
背景:双药治疗方案(2DR)是近年来推出的一种治疗方案,它可以减少抗逆转录病毒疗法(ART)的毒性和药物相互作用,同时对艾滋病病毒感染者(PWH)具有与三药治疗方案(3DR)相当的疗效。本研究的目的是比较多罗替拉韦/拉米夫定(DTG/3TC)单片剂 2DR 与常用的 3DR 在美国 DTG/3TC 上市后 24 个月内对有抗逆转录病毒治疗经验、病毒学抑制的感染者的实际疗效和持久性:病毒载量[VL] ®队列,并随访至 2021 年 4 月 30 日。采用单变量泊松回归(发病率)和边际结构 Cox 比例危险模型(治疗加权的逆概率)(危险比)来量化治疗方案类型与确诊病毒学失败(连续 2 次 VL≥ 200 copies/mL)或治疗方案终止之间的关系。对停药原因进行了研究:共有8037名有抗逆转录病毒治疗经验、病毒学抑制的PWH符合纳入标准,并改用DTG/3TC(1450人)、BIC/FTC/TAF(5691人)或基于DTG的3DR(896人)。所有组别的确诊病毒学失败发生率都很低,分别为每 100 人年 0.66 例(DTG/3TC)、0.84 例(BIC/FTC/TAF)和 1.78 例(DTG 3DR)。与 DTG/3TC 相比,只有 DTG 3DR 与确诊病毒学失败的风险显著增加有关(风险比:5.21,95% 置信区间:1.85, 14.67)。每 100 个 py 中,DTG 3DR 组的停药率最高(24.90),其次是 DTG/3TC 组(17.69)和 BIC/FTC/TAF 组(8.30)。无论采用哪种治疗方案,因疗效(VL ≥ 200 copies/mL;4%)或耐受性(不良诊断、副作用或实验室异常;6%)而停药的情况并不常见:结论:在接受新治疗方案的病毒学抑制的艾滋病患者中,很少有人在实际临床治疗中出现病毒学失败。虽然治疗方案的停药率很高,但大多数停药并不能归因于缺乏病毒学控制或耐受性差。这些研究结果表明,DTG/3TC 是有抗逆转录病毒治疗经验、病毒学抑制的 PWH 的有效选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
AIDS Research and Therapy
AIDS Research and Therapy INFECTIOUS DISEASES-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
4.50%
发文量
51
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: AIDS Research and Therapy publishes articles on basic science, translational, clinical, social, epidemiological, behavioral and educational sciences articles focused on the treatment and prevention of HIV/AIDS, and the search for the cure. The Journal publishes articles on novel and developing treatment strategies for AIDS as well as on the outcomes of established treatment strategies. Original research articles on animal models that form an essential part of the AIDS treatment research are also considered
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信