Leveraging the potential of 1.0-mm i.d. columns in UHPLC-HRMS-based untargeted metabolomics.

IF 3.8 2区 化学 Q1 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Danila La Gioia, Emanuela Salviati, Manuela Giovanna Basilicata, Claudia Felici, Oronza A Botrugno, Giovanni Tonon, Eduardo Sommella, Pietro Campiglia
{"title":"Leveraging the potential of 1.0-mm i.d. columns in UHPLC-HRMS-based untargeted metabolomics.","authors":"Danila La Gioia, Emanuela Salviati, Manuela Giovanna Basilicata, Claudia Felici, Oronza A Botrugno, Giovanni Tonon, Eduardo Sommella, Pietro Campiglia","doi":"10.1007/s00216-024-05588-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Untargeted metabolomics UHPLC-HRMS workflows typically employ narrowbore 2.1-mm inner diameter (i.d.) columns. However, the wide concentration range of the metabolome and the need to often analyze small sample amounts poses challenges to these approaches. Reducing the column diameter could be a potential solution. Herein, we evaluated the performance of a microbore 1.0-mm i.d. setup compared to the 2.1-mm i.d. benchmark for untargeted metabolomics. The 1.0-mm i.d. setup was implemented on a micro-UHPLC system, while the 2.1-mm i.d. on a standard UHPLC, both coupled to quadrupole-orbitrap HRMS. On polar standard metabolites, a sensitivity gain with an average 3.8-fold increase over the 2.1-mm i.d., along with lower LOD (LOD<sub>avg</sub> 1.48 ng/mL vs. 6.18 ng/mL) and LOQ (LOQ<sub>avg</sub> 4.94 ng/mL vs. 20.60 ng/mL), was observed. The microbore method detected and quantified all metabolites at LLOQ with respect to 2.1, also demonstrating good repeatability with lower CV% for retention times (0.29% vs. 0.63%) and peak areas (4.65% vs. 7.27%). The analysis of various samples, in both RP and HILIC modes, including different plasma volumes, dried blood spots (DBS), and colorectal cancer (CRC) patient-derived organoids (PDOs), in full scan-data dependent mode (FS-DDA) reported a significant increase in MS1 and MS2 features, as well as MS/MS spectral matches by 38.95%, 39.26%, and 18.23%, respectively. These findings demonstrate that 1.0-mm i.d. columns in UHPLC-HRMS could be a potential strategy to enhance coverage for low-amount samples while maintaining the same analytical throughput and robustness of 2.1-mm i.d. formats, with reduced solvent consumption.</p>","PeriodicalId":462,"journal":{"name":"Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-024-05588-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Untargeted metabolomics UHPLC-HRMS workflows typically employ narrowbore 2.1-mm inner diameter (i.d.) columns. However, the wide concentration range of the metabolome and the need to often analyze small sample amounts poses challenges to these approaches. Reducing the column diameter could be a potential solution. Herein, we evaluated the performance of a microbore 1.0-mm i.d. setup compared to the 2.1-mm i.d. benchmark for untargeted metabolomics. The 1.0-mm i.d. setup was implemented on a micro-UHPLC system, while the 2.1-mm i.d. on a standard UHPLC, both coupled to quadrupole-orbitrap HRMS. On polar standard metabolites, a sensitivity gain with an average 3.8-fold increase over the 2.1-mm i.d., along with lower LOD (LODavg 1.48 ng/mL vs. 6.18 ng/mL) and LOQ (LOQavg 4.94 ng/mL vs. 20.60 ng/mL), was observed. The microbore method detected and quantified all metabolites at LLOQ with respect to 2.1, also demonstrating good repeatability with lower CV% for retention times (0.29% vs. 0.63%) and peak areas (4.65% vs. 7.27%). The analysis of various samples, in both RP and HILIC modes, including different plasma volumes, dried blood spots (DBS), and colorectal cancer (CRC) patient-derived organoids (PDOs), in full scan-data dependent mode (FS-DDA) reported a significant increase in MS1 and MS2 features, as well as MS/MS spectral matches by 38.95%, 39.26%, and 18.23%, respectively. These findings demonstrate that 1.0-mm i.d. columns in UHPLC-HRMS could be a potential strategy to enhance coverage for low-amount samples while maintaining the same analytical throughput and robustness of 2.1-mm i.d. formats, with reduced solvent consumption.

在基于 UHPLC-HRMS 的非靶向代谢组学研究中发挥 1.0 毫米内径色谱柱的潜力。
非靶向代谢组学 UHPLC-HRMS 工作流程通常采用内径 (i.d.) 为 2.1 毫米的窄孔色谱柱。然而,代谢组的浓度范围很广,而且经常需要分析少量样品,这给这些方法带来了挑战。缩小色谱柱直径可能是一个潜在的解决方案。在此,我们评估了微孔 1.0 毫米内径装置与 2.1 毫米内径基准装置相比在非靶向代谢组学方面的性能。1.0 毫米内径装置在微型超高效液相色谱系统上使用,而 2.1 毫米内径装置在标准超高效液相色谱系统上使用,两者均与四极杆-轨道阱 HRMS 联用。对于极性标准代谢物,与 2.1 mm 直径法相比,灵敏度平均提高了 3.8 倍,LOD(LODavg 1.48 ng/mL vs. 6.18 ng/mL)和 LOQ(LOQavg 4.94 ng/mL vs. 20.60 ng/mL)也有所降低。与 2.1 相比,微孔法检测和定量的所有代谢物都达到了最低检出限,同时还表现出良好的重复性,保留时间(0.29% 对 0.63%)和峰面积(4.65% 对 7.27%)的 CV%都较低。在全扫描-数据依赖模式(FS-DDA)下,以 RP 和 HILIC 两种模式分析了各种样品,包括不同容量的血浆、干血斑(DBS)和结直肠癌(CRC)患者衍生的器官组织(PDO),结果表明 MS1 和 MS2 特征以及 MS/MS 图谱匹配度分别显著提高了 38.95%、39.26% 和 18.23%。这些研究结果表明,在超高效液相色谱-质谱联用仪中使用 1.0 毫米内径色谱柱可能是一种潜在的策略,可以在保持与 2.1 毫米内径色谱柱相同的分析通量和稳健性的同时,减少溶剂消耗,提高对低浓度样品的覆盖率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
4.70%
发文量
638
审稿时长
2.1 months
期刊介绍: Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry’s mission is the rapid publication of excellent and high-impact research articles on fundamental and applied topics of analytical and bioanalytical measurement science. Its scope is broad, and ranges from novel measurement platforms and their characterization to multidisciplinary approaches that effectively address important scientific problems. The Editors encourage submissions presenting innovative analytical research in concept, instrumentation, methods, and/or applications, including: mass spectrometry, spectroscopy, and electroanalysis; advanced separations; analytical strategies in “-omics” and imaging, bioanalysis, and sampling; miniaturized devices, medical diagnostics, sensors; analytical characterization of nano- and biomaterials; chemometrics and advanced data analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信