Assessing on-site plastics fragmentation: Linking macroplastics litter to microplastics pollution in vegetable fields.

IF 8.2 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Science of the Total Environment Pub Date : 2024-12-10 Epub Date: 2024-10-29 DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.177168
Fabio Corradini, Eva Melillán, Mauricio Schoebitz, Rocío Carrasco, María Jiménez
{"title":"Assessing on-site plastics fragmentation: Linking macroplastics litter to microplastics pollution in vegetable fields.","authors":"Fabio Corradini, Eva Melillán, Mauricio Schoebitz, Rocío Carrasco, María Jiménez","doi":"10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.177168","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study proposes a novel approach to determine whether farmers act as a pollution source of microplastics through macroplastic mismanagement or if they are temporary hosts of in-transit microplastics. Using a case-study approach, it was hypothesized that 90 % of soil microplastics would trace back to macroplastic waste mismanaged by farmers. To determine the amount of soil microplastics, linear transects were established and microplastic litter was counted and classified. Additionally, composite soil samples were used to count and colour-classify microplastics. The Kendall correlation was used to differentiate between the colour ranks of macro- and microplastics to discriminate between plastic on-site fragmentation or exogenous plastic pollution. For this, 37 vegetable farms in central Chile were assessed after the growing season. Farms showed lower microplastic counts than previously reported for similar productive conditions (3.68 ± 3.28 u/kg). A median colour correlation of 0.43 (IQR = 0.18-0.55) was observed between macro- and microplastics. Only in 25 % of the studied fields did on-site plastic fragmentation predominate over exogenous plastic pollution. The applied approach is simple to implement and does not require specialized laboratory equipment. We hope that the proposed methodology will serve in environmental monitoring to evaluate adherence to good agricultural practices and to guide pollution-prevention measures.</p>","PeriodicalId":422,"journal":{"name":"Science of the Total Environment","volume":" ","pages":"177168"},"PeriodicalIF":8.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science of the Total Environment","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.177168","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study proposes a novel approach to determine whether farmers act as a pollution source of microplastics through macroplastic mismanagement or if they are temporary hosts of in-transit microplastics. Using a case-study approach, it was hypothesized that 90 % of soil microplastics would trace back to macroplastic waste mismanaged by farmers. To determine the amount of soil microplastics, linear transects were established and microplastic litter was counted and classified. Additionally, composite soil samples were used to count and colour-classify microplastics. The Kendall correlation was used to differentiate between the colour ranks of macro- and microplastics to discriminate between plastic on-site fragmentation or exogenous plastic pollution. For this, 37 vegetable farms in central Chile were assessed after the growing season. Farms showed lower microplastic counts than previously reported for similar productive conditions (3.68 ± 3.28 u/kg). A median colour correlation of 0.43 (IQR = 0.18-0.55) was observed between macro- and microplastics. Only in 25 % of the studied fields did on-site plastic fragmentation predominate over exogenous plastic pollution. The applied approach is simple to implement and does not require specialized laboratory equipment. We hope that the proposed methodology will serve in environmental monitoring to evaluate adherence to good agricultural practices and to guide pollution-prevention measures.

评估现场塑料碎片:将菜地中的大塑料垃圾与微塑料污染联系起来。
本研究提出了一种新方法,以确定农民是否通过宏观塑料管理不善而成为微塑料的污染源,或者他们是否是在途微塑料的临时寄主。研究采用案例研究法,假设 90% 的土壤微塑料可追溯到农民管理不当的大型塑料废物。为了确定土壤微塑料的数量,研究人员建立了线性横断面,并对微塑料垃圾进行了计数和分类。此外,还使用复合土壤样本对微塑料进行计数和颜色分类。利用肯德尔相关性来区分大型塑料和微型塑料的颜色等级,以区分塑料现场破碎或外源塑料污染。为此,在生长季节结束后,对智利中部的 37 个蔬菜农场进行了评估。在类似的生产条件下,农场的微塑料数量(3.68 ± 3.28 u/kg)低于之前的报告。宏观塑料和微观塑料之间的颜色相关性中位数为 0.43(IQR = 0.18-0.55)。只有在 25% 的研究区域中,现场塑料碎片污染比外源塑料污染更为严重。所应用的方法简单易行,不需要专门的实验室设备。我们希望所提出的方法可用于环境监测,以评估良好农业规范的遵守情况,并指导污染预防措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Science of the Total Environment
Science of the Total Environment 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
17.60
自引率
10.20%
发文量
8726
审稿时长
2.4 months
期刊介绍: The Science of the Total Environment is an international journal dedicated to scientific research on the environment and its interaction with humanity. It covers a wide range of disciplines and seeks to publish innovative, hypothesis-driven, and impactful research that explores the entire environment, including the atmosphere, lithosphere, hydrosphere, biosphere, and anthroposphere. The journal's updated Aims & Scope emphasizes the importance of interdisciplinary environmental research with broad impact. Priority is given to studies that advance fundamental understanding and explore the interconnectedness of multiple environmental spheres. Field studies are preferred, while laboratory experiments must demonstrate significant methodological advancements or mechanistic insights with direct relevance to the environment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信