Letter: Filling the Gaps—Enhancing MASLD Prognosis With Imaging, Diverse Populations and Extended Follow-Up. Authors' Reply

IF 6.6 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Nobuharu Tamaki, Takefumi Kimura, Shun-Ichi Wakabayashi, Takeji Umemura, Namiki Izumi, Rohit Loomba, Masayuki Kurosaki
{"title":"Letter: Filling the Gaps—Enhancing MASLD Prognosis With Imaging, Diverse Populations and Extended Follow-Up. Authors' Reply","authors":"Nobuharu Tamaki,&nbsp;Takefumi Kimura,&nbsp;Shun-Ichi Wakabayashi,&nbsp;Takeji Umemura,&nbsp;Namiki Izumi,&nbsp;Rohit Loomba,&nbsp;Masayuki Kurosaki","doi":"10.1111/apt.18356","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In this study, we investigated whether the number of cardiometabolic criteria was associated with cardiovascular event risk and liver-related event risk [<span>1</span>]. We found that while the risk of cardiovascular events increased with the number of cardiometabolic criteria, no association was observed between the number of cardiometabolic criteria and liver-related event risk. Since the diagnosis of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) requires the presence of at least one cardiometabolic criterion, our findings indicate the need for further examination of the MASLD diagnostic criteria.</p><p>As noted by Shen et al., a limitation of the Japan Medical Data Center (JMDC) database is the lack of imaging data [<span>2</span>]. In this study, the diagnosis of steatotic liver relied on International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-10 codes and non-invasive steatosis markers. Although magnetic resonance elastography and proton density fat fraction provide accurate assessments of liver fibrosis and hepatic steatosis content, their application in large populations presents significant challenges [<span>3, 4</span>]. While steatotic liver is often diagnosed via ultrasound in large populations, ultrasound has low sensitivity for detecting mild steatosis [<span>5, 6</span>]. Furthermore, the phenomenon of ‘burned-out’, where hepatic steatosis decreases as fibrosis progresses, is well documented [<span>7</span>]. Consequently, ultrasound-based diagnosis of steatotic liver may introduce additional biases. Nonetheless, the use of ICD-10 codes and non-invasive steatosis markers for diagnosing steatotic liver in large cohorts remains meaningful.</p><p>We acknowledge that the JMDC cohort predominantly consists of relatively young males, which introduces a bias. As a result, the incidence rates of cardiovascular and liver-related events in this cohort are likely lower compared to higher-risk populations, such as the elderly. Therefore, while it is essential to evaluate the relevance of cardiometabolic criteria in high-risk populations, our findings raise important questions regarding the current MASLD diagnostic criteria.</p><p>Regarding the follow-up period, there may be some misunderstanding. In the follow-up analysis, we examined the association between the average number of cardiometabolic criteria and event risk from the first year of observation through the tenth year, with an average follow-up period of 5.2 years. Thus, our results reflect the association between long-term changes in clinical status and event risk.</p><p>In this study, we found that cardiometabolic criteria were not strongly associated with liver-related event risk. Although the impact of antidiabetic drugs and glycaemic control was beyond the scope of this investigation [<span>8</span>], we plan to explore this aspect in future research.</p><p>The authors' declarations of personal and financial interests are unchanged from those in the original article [Ref. <span>1</span>].</p><p><b>Nobuharu Tamaki:</b> conceptualization, writing – original draft, writing – review and editing, funding acquisition. <b>Takefumi Kimura:</b> conceptualization, writing – original draft, writing – review and editing. <b>Shun-Ichi Wakabayashi:</b> conceptualization, writing – original draft, writing – review and editing. <b>Takeji Umemura:</b> writing – review and editing, funding acquisition, supervision. <b>Namiki Izumi:</b> writing – review and editing, supervision. <b>Rohit Loomba:</b> writing – review and editing, supervision, funding acquisition. <b>Masayuki Kurosaki:</b> conceptualization, funding acquisition, writing – original draft, writing – review and editing, supervision.</p><p>Rohit Loomba serves as a consultant to Aardvark Therapeutics, Altimmune, Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, AstraZeneca, Cascade Pharmaceuticals, Eli Lilly, Gilead, Glympse bio, Inipharma, Intercept, Inventiva, Ionis, Janssen Inc., Lipidio, Madrigal, Neurobo, Novo Nordisk, Merck, Pfizer, Sagimet, 89 bio, Takeda, Terns Pharmaceuticals and Viking Therapeutics. RL has stock options in Sagimet biosciences. In addition, his institution received research grants from Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Astrazeneca, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Galectin Therapeutics, Gilead, Intercept, Hanmi, Intercept, Inventiva, Ionis, Janssen, Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Merck, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Sonic Incytes and Terns Pharmaceuticals. Co-founder of LipoNexus Inc. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.</p><p>This article is linked to Tamaki et al papers. To view these articles, visit https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.18205 and https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.18338.</p>","PeriodicalId":121,"journal":{"name":"Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics","volume":"60 11-12","pages":"1664-1665"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/apt.18356","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/apt.18356","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this study, we investigated whether the number of cardiometabolic criteria was associated with cardiovascular event risk and liver-related event risk [1]. We found that while the risk of cardiovascular events increased with the number of cardiometabolic criteria, no association was observed between the number of cardiometabolic criteria and liver-related event risk. Since the diagnosis of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) requires the presence of at least one cardiometabolic criterion, our findings indicate the need for further examination of the MASLD diagnostic criteria.

As noted by Shen et al., a limitation of the Japan Medical Data Center (JMDC) database is the lack of imaging data [2]. In this study, the diagnosis of steatotic liver relied on International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-10 codes and non-invasive steatosis markers. Although magnetic resonance elastography and proton density fat fraction provide accurate assessments of liver fibrosis and hepatic steatosis content, their application in large populations presents significant challenges [3, 4]. While steatotic liver is often diagnosed via ultrasound in large populations, ultrasound has low sensitivity for detecting mild steatosis [5, 6]. Furthermore, the phenomenon of ‘burned-out’, where hepatic steatosis decreases as fibrosis progresses, is well documented [7]. Consequently, ultrasound-based diagnosis of steatotic liver may introduce additional biases. Nonetheless, the use of ICD-10 codes and non-invasive steatosis markers for diagnosing steatotic liver in large cohorts remains meaningful.

We acknowledge that the JMDC cohort predominantly consists of relatively young males, which introduces a bias. As a result, the incidence rates of cardiovascular and liver-related events in this cohort are likely lower compared to higher-risk populations, such as the elderly. Therefore, while it is essential to evaluate the relevance of cardiometabolic criteria in high-risk populations, our findings raise important questions regarding the current MASLD diagnostic criteria.

Regarding the follow-up period, there may be some misunderstanding. In the follow-up analysis, we examined the association between the average number of cardiometabolic criteria and event risk from the first year of observation through the tenth year, with an average follow-up period of 5.2 years. Thus, our results reflect the association between long-term changes in clinical status and event risk.

In this study, we found that cardiometabolic criteria were not strongly associated with liver-related event risk. Although the impact of antidiabetic drugs and glycaemic control was beyond the scope of this investigation [8], we plan to explore this aspect in future research.

The authors' declarations of personal and financial interests are unchanged from those in the original article [Ref. 1].

Nobuharu Tamaki: conceptualization, writing – original draft, writing – review and editing, funding acquisition. Takefumi Kimura: conceptualization, writing – original draft, writing – review and editing. Shun-Ichi Wakabayashi: conceptualization, writing – original draft, writing – review and editing. Takeji Umemura: writing – review and editing, funding acquisition, supervision. Namiki Izumi: writing – review and editing, supervision. Rohit Loomba: writing – review and editing, supervision, funding acquisition. Masayuki Kurosaki: conceptualization, funding acquisition, writing – original draft, writing – review and editing, supervision.

Rohit Loomba serves as a consultant to Aardvark Therapeutics, Altimmune, Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, AstraZeneca, Cascade Pharmaceuticals, Eli Lilly, Gilead, Glympse bio, Inipharma, Intercept, Inventiva, Ionis, Janssen Inc., Lipidio, Madrigal, Neurobo, Novo Nordisk, Merck, Pfizer, Sagimet, 89 bio, Takeda, Terns Pharmaceuticals and Viking Therapeutics. RL has stock options in Sagimet biosciences. In addition, his institution received research grants from Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Astrazeneca, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Galectin Therapeutics, Gilead, Intercept, Hanmi, Intercept, Inventiva, Ionis, Janssen, Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Merck, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Sonic Incytes and Terns Pharmaceuticals. Co-founder of LipoNexus Inc. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

This article is linked to Tamaki et al papers. To view these articles, visit https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.18205 and https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.18338.

信:填补空白--通过影像学、不同人群和延长随访来加强 MASLD 的预后。作者回复。
在这项研究中,我们调查了心脏代谢标准的数量是否与心血管事件风险和肝脏相关事件风险有关[1]。我们发现,虽然心血管事件风险随着心脏代谢标准的数量增加而增加,但在心脏代谢标准的数量与肝脏相关事件风险之间却没有观察到任何关联。由于代谢功能障碍相关性脂肪性肝病(MASLD)的诊断要求至少存在一项心脏代谢标准,我们的研究结果表明有必要进一步研究MASLD的诊断标准。在本研究中,脂肪肝的诊断依赖于国际疾病分类(ICD)-10代码和非侵入性脂肪肝标志物。虽然磁共振弹性成像和质子密度脂肪分数能准确评估肝纤维化和肝脂肪变性的含量,但在大量人群中应用这些指标却面临着巨大挑战[3, 4]。虽然在大量人群中,脂肪肝通常是通过超声波诊断出来的,但超声波检测轻度脂肪肝的灵敏度较低[5, 6]。此外,"烧毁 "现象,即肝脏脂肪变性随着肝纤维化的进展而减轻,也是有据可查的 [7]。因此,基于超声波的脂肪肝诊断可能会带来额外的偏差。尽管如此,使用 ICD-10 编码和非侵入性脂肪变性标记物诊断大型队列中的脂肪变性肝脏仍然很有意义。我们承认,JMDC 队列主要由相对年轻的男性组成,这带来了偏差。因此,与老年人等高风险人群相比,该队列中心血管和肝脏相关事件的发生率可能较低。因此,尽管评估心血管代谢标准在高危人群中的相关性非常重要,但我们的研究结果提出了有关当前 MASLD 诊断标准的重要问题。在随访分析中,我们研究了从观察第一年到第十年(平均随访时间为 5.2 年)的心脏代谢标准平均数量与事件风险之间的关联。因此,我们的结果反映了临床状态的长期变化与事件风险之间的关联。在这项研究中,我们发现心脏代谢标准与肝脏相关事件风险并无密切联系。尽管抗糖尿病药物和血糖控制的影响超出了本研究的范围[8],但我们计划在未来的研究中探讨这方面的问题。作者的个人和经济利益声明与原文[参考文献 1]中的声明相同。Takefumi Kimura:构思、撰写-原稿、撰写-审阅和编辑。Shun-Ichi Wakabayashi:构思、写作--原稿、写作--审阅和编辑。Takeji Umemura:撰写--审阅和编辑、获取资金、监督。Namiki Izumi:写作--审阅和编辑、监督。Rohit Loomba:写作--审阅和编辑、监督、获取资金。Masayuki Kurosaki:构思、获取资金、撰写-原稿、撰写-审阅和编辑、监督。Rohit Loomba 担任 Aardvark Therapeutics、Altimmune、Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals、AstraZeneca、Cascade Pharmaceuticals、Eli Lilly、Gilead、Glympse bio、Inipharma、Intercept、Inventiva、Ionis、Janssen Inc、Lipidio、Madrigal、Neurobo、诺和诺德、默克、辉瑞、Sagimet、89 bio、武田、Terns Pharmaceuticals 和 Viking Therapeutics。RL 拥有 Sagimet 生物科学公司的股票期权。此外,他所在的机构还获得了 Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals、阿斯利康、勃林格殷格翰、百时美施贵宝、礼来、Galectin Therapeutics、吉利德、Intercept、韩美、Intercept、Inventiva、Ionis、杨森、Madrigal Pharmaceuticals、默克、诺和诺德、辉瑞、Sonic Incytes 和 Terns Pharmaceuticals 的研究资助。LipoNexus Inc.联合创始人。本文与 Tamaki 等人的论文相关。要查看这些文章,请访问 https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.18205 和 https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.18338。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.60
自引率
7.90%
发文量
527
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics is a global pharmacology journal focused on the impact of drugs on the human gastrointestinal and hepato-biliary systems. It covers a diverse range of topics, often with immediate clinical relevance to its readership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信