Characterizing local pig breeds as reservoirs for the domestic pig genetic variability worldwide via contributions to gene diversity and allelic richness

IF 2.7 2区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
Katherine D Arias, Iván Fernández, Juan Pablo Gutiérrez, Riccardo Bozzi, Isabel Álvarez, Félix Goyache
{"title":"Characterizing local pig breeds as reservoirs for the domestic pig genetic variability worldwide via contributions to gene diversity and allelic richness","authors":"Katherine D Arias, Iván Fernández, Juan Pablo Gutiérrez, Riccardo Bozzi, Isabel Álvarez, Félix Goyache","doi":"10.1093/jas/skae329","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Contributions to gene diversity and allelic richness were computed in a total of 2,260 domestic pig genotypes, sharing 53,626 autosomal SNPs, belonging to 98 pig subpopulations worldwide (41 Asian, 696 genotypes; 20 American, 262 genotypes; and 37 European, 686 genotypes), using 616 pig samples belonging to six different Cosmopolitan pig breeds as an outgroup, to ascertain if local pig subpopulation can be considered reservoirs of genetic diversity for the whole domestic pig species worldwide. Assessments were carried out for the whole dataset and separately for the American-European and Asian subsets. Effective population size was computed at the subpopulation level using molecular coancestry and linkage disequilibrium information to ensure that estimates of contributions to diversity were not affected by demographic issues. Most American and European pig subpopulations tended to have favorable contributions to both gene diversity and allelic richness. However, contributions to allelic richness were more consistent than those obtained for gene diversity, whether the computations are performed using either the whole dataset or the American-Asian subset, suggesting that allelic richness can be a key parameter to identify putative reservoirs for the species. The Asian pig subpopulations never contributed favorably to the allelic richness of the domestic pig metapopulation. Although these results can partially be explained by the highly divergent origins of the American-European and the Asian pig subpopulations, it cannot be discarded that the results obtained for the Asian subpopulations are biased due to a worse calling performance of the pig SNP arrays used for genotyping. The use of other potentially less biased sources of genotypic information is advisable to compare the Asian and American-European pig subpopulations genetic diversity.","PeriodicalId":14895,"journal":{"name":"Journal of animal science","volume":"236 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of animal science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skae329","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Contributions to gene diversity and allelic richness were computed in a total of 2,260 domestic pig genotypes, sharing 53,626 autosomal SNPs, belonging to 98 pig subpopulations worldwide (41 Asian, 696 genotypes; 20 American, 262 genotypes; and 37 European, 686 genotypes), using 616 pig samples belonging to six different Cosmopolitan pig breeds as an outgroup, to ascertain if local pig subpopulation can be considered reservoirs of genetic diversity for the whole domestic pig species worldwide. Assessments were carried out for the whole dataset and separately for the American-European and Asian subsets. Effective population size was computed at the subpopulation level using molecular coancestry and linkage disequilibrium information to ensure that estimates of contributions to diversity were not affected by demographic issues. Most American and European pig subpopulations tended to have favorable contributions to both gene diversity and allelic richness. However, contributions to allelic richness were more consistent than those obtained for gene diversity, whether the computations are performed using either the whole dataset or the American-Asian subset, suggesting that allelic richness can be a key parameter to identify putative reservoirs for the species. The Asian pig subpopulations never contributed favorably to the allelic richness of the domestic pig metapopulation. Although these results can partially be explained by the highly divergent origins of the American-European and the Asian pig subpopulations, it cannot be discarded that the results obtained for the Asian subpopulations are biased due to a worse calling performance of the pig SNP arrays used for genotyping. The use of other potentially less biased sources of genotypic information is advisable to compare the Asian and American-European pig subpopulations genetic diversity.
通过对基因多样性和等位基因丰富度的贡献,确定地方猪种作为全球家猪遗传变异库的特征
计算了属于全球 98 个猪亚群(41 个亚洲亚群,696 个基因型;20 个美洲亚群,262 个基因型;37 个欧洲亚群,686 个基因型)的 2,260 个家猪基因型(共享 53,626 个常染色体 SNPs)的基因多样性和等位基因丰富度的贡献,并以属于 6 个不同世界猪种的 616 个猪样本作为外群,以确定当地猪亚群是否可被视为全球整个家猪物种的遗传多样性宝库。对整个数据集以及美欧和亚洲子集分别进行了评估。在亚种群水平上,利用分子共存和连锁不平衡信息计算有效种群规模,以确保对多样性贡献的估计不受人口统计问题的影响。大多数美洲猪和欧洲猪亚种群往往对基因多样性和等位基因丰富度都有有利的贡献。然而,与基因多样性的贡献相比,等位基因丰富度的贡献更为一致,无论计算时使用的是整个数据集还是美洲-亚洲子集。亚洲猪亚群从未对家猪元群的等位基因丰富度做出有利贡献。虽然美欧猪亚群和亚洲猪亚群的起源高度不同可以部分解释这些结果,但也不能排除亚洲亚群的结果存在偏差,因为用于基因分型的猪 SNP 阵列的调用性能较差。在比较亚欧猪亚群遗传多样性时,最好使用其他可能偏差较小的基因型信息来源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of animal science
Journal of animal science 农林科学-奶制品与动物科学
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
12.10%
发文量
1589
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Animal Science (JAS) is the premier journal for animal science and serves as the leading source of new knowledge and perspective in this area. JAS publishes more than 500 fully reviewed research articles, invited reviews, technical notes, and letters to the editor each year. Articles published in JAS encompass a broad range of research topics in animal production and fundamental aspects of genetics, nutrition, physiology, and preparation and utilization of animal products. Articles typically report research with beef cattle, companion animals, goats, horses, pigs, and sheep; however, studies involving other farm animals, aquatic and wildlife species, and laboratory animal species that address fundamental questions related to livestock and companion animal biology will be considered for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信