Ecological but Not Biological Traits of European Riverine Invertebrates Respond Consistently to Anthropogenic Impacts

IF 6.3 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
James S. Sinclair, Rachel Stubbington, Ralf B. Schäfer, Libuše Barešová, Núria Bonada, Zoltán Csabai, J. Iwan Jones, Aitor Larrañaga, John F. Murphy, Petr Pařil, Marek Polášek, Jes J. Rasmussen, Michal Straka, Gábor Várbíró, Ralf C. M. Verdonschot, Ellen A. R. Welti, Peter Haase
{"title":"Ecological but Not Biological Traits of European Riverine Invertebrates Respond Consistently to Anthropogenic Impacts","authors":"James S. Sinclair,&nbsp;Rachel Stubbington,&nbsp;Ralf B. Schäfer,&nbsp;Libuše Barešová,&nbsp;Núria Bonada,&nbsp;Zoltán Csabai,&nbsp;J. Iwan Jones,&nbsp;Aitor Larrañaga,&nbsp;John F. Murphy,&nbsp;Petr Pařil,&nbsp;Marek Polášek,&nbsp;Jes J. Rasmussen,&nbsp;Michal Straka,&nbsp;Gábor Várbíró,&nbsp;Ralf C. M. Verdonschot,&nbsp;Ellen A. R. Welti,&nbsp;Peter Haase","doi":"10.1111/geb.13931","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>To determine which riverine invertebrate traits respond consistently to anthropogenic impacts across multiple biogeographic regions.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Location</h3>\n \n <p>Europe.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Time Period</h3>\n \n <p>1981–2021.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Major Taxa Studied</h3>\n \n <p>Riverine invertebrates.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We compiled a database of riverine invertebrate community time series for 673 sites across six European countries spanning six freshwater ecoregions. We compared trait responses to anthropogenic impacts (quantified as changes in ‘ecological quality’) among regions for seven ‘ecological’ traits, which reflect habitat preferences, and nine ‘biological’ traits (e.g., morphology or life history), which represent taxon-specific attributes that can influence ecosystem processes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Four ecological traits (current, microhabitat, salinity and trophic preferences) and one biological trait (dispersal mode) responded consistently across regions. These responses were primarily driven by spatial differences among poorer to better quality sites. Responses to temporal changes in quality were comparable but less pronounced.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Main Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Consistent responses to anthropogenic impacts across multiple ecological traits indicate these traits may improve broader scale measurements, comparisons and predictions of community responses. However, we could not use ecological traits to identify the actions of specific stressors because multiple traits always responded as a group. Inconsistent responses across almost all biological traits indicated that these traits may be less predictive of impacts across regions. Predictions of how biological traits, and associated ecosystem processes, respond to anthropogenic impacts may be most effective at regional scales where responses are more consistent.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":176,"journal":{"name":"Global Ecology and Biogeography","volume":"33 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/geb.13931","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Ecology and Biogeography","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/geb.13931","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim

To determine which riverine invertebrate traits respond consistently to anthropogenic impacts across multiple biogeographic regions.

Location

Europe.

Time Period

1981–2021.

Major Taxa Studied

Riverine invertebrates.

Methods

We compiled a database of riverine invertebrate community time series for 673 sites across six European countries spanning six freshwater ecoregions. We compared trait responses to anthropogenic impacts (quantified as changes in ‘ecological quality’) among regions for seven ‘ecological’ traits, which reflect habitat preferences, and nine ‘biological’ traits (e.g., morphology or life history), which represent taxon-specific attributes that can influence ecosystem processes.

Results

Four ecological traits (current, microhabitat, salinity and trophic preferences) and one biological trait (dispersal mode) responded consistently across regions. These responses were primarily driven by spatial differences among poorer to better quality sites. Responses to temporal changes in quality were comparable but less pronounced.

Main Conclusions

Consistent responses to anthropogenic impacts across multiple ecological traits indicate these traits may improve broader scale measurements, comparisons and predictions of community responses. However, we could not use ecological traits to identify the actions of specific stressors because multiple traits always responded as a group. Inconsistent responses across almost all biological traits indicated that these traits may be less predictive of impacts across regions. Predictions of how biological traits, and associated ecosystem processes, respond to anthropogenic impacts may be most effective at regional scales where responses are more consistent.

Abstract Image

欧洲沿河无脊椎动物的生态特征而非生物特征对人类活动影响的反应一致
确定在多个生物地理区域中,河流无脊椎动物的哪些特征会对人为影响做出一致的反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Global Ecology and Biogeography
Global Ecology and Biogeography 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
3.10%
发文量
170
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Global Ecology and Biogeography (GEB) welcomes papers that investigate broad-scale (in space, time and/or taxonomy), general patterns in the organization of ecological systems and assemblages, and the processes that underlie them. In particular, GEB welcomes studies that use macroecological methods, comparative analyses, meta-analyses, reviews, spatial analyses and modelling to arrive at general, conceptual conclusions. Studies in GEB need not be global in spatial extent, but the conclusions and implications of the study must be relevant to ecologists and biogeographers globally, rather than being limited to local areas, or specific taxa. Similarly, GEB is not limited to spatial studies; we are equally interested in the general patterns of nature through time, among taxa (e.g., body sizes, dispersal abilities), through the course of evolution, etc. Further, GEB welcomes papers that investigate general impacts of human activities on ecological systems in accordance with the above criteria.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信