James S. Sinclair, Rachel Stubbington, Ralf B. Schäfer, Libuše Barešová, Núria Bonada, Zoltán Csabai, J. Iwan Jones, Aitor Larrañaga, John F. Murphy, Petr Pařil, Marek Polášek, Jes J. Rasmussen, Michal Straka, Gábor Várbíró, Ralf C. M. Verdonschot, Ellen A. R. Welti, Peter Haase
{"title":"Ecological but Not Biological Traits of European Riverine Invertebrates Respond Consistently to Anthropogenic Impacts","authors":"James S. Sinclair, Rachel Stubbington, Ralf B. Schäfer, Libuše Barešová, Núria Bonada, Zoltán Csabai, J. Iwan Jones, Aitor Larrañaga, John F. Murphy, Petr Pařil, Marek Polášek, Jes J. Rasmussen, Michal Straka, Gábor Várbíró, Ralf C. M. Verdonschot, Ellen A. R. Welti, Peter Haase","doi":"10.1111/geb.13931","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>To determine which riverine invertebrate traits respond consistently to anthropogenic impacts across multiple biogeographic regions.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Location</h3>\n \n <p>Europe.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Time Period</h3>\n \n <p>1981–2021.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Major Taxa Studied</h3>\n \n <p>Riverine invertebrates.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We compiled a database of riverine invertebrate community time series for 673 sites across six European countries spanning six freshwater ecoregions. We compared trait responses to anthropogenic impacts (quantified as changes in ‘ecological quality’) among regions for seven ‘ecological’ traits, which reflect habitat preferences, and nine ‘biological’ traits (e.g., morphology or life history), which represent taxon-specific attributes that can influence ecosystem processes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Four ecological traits (current, microhabitat, salinity and trophic preferences) and one biological trait (dispersal mode) responded consistently across regions. These responses were primarily driven by spatial differences among poorer to better quality sites. Responses to temporal changes in quality were comparable but less pronounced.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Main Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Consistent responses to anthropogenic impacts across multiple ecological traits indicate these traits may improve broader scale measurements, comparisons and predictions of community responses. However, we could not use ecological traits to identify the actions of specific stressors because multiple traits always responded as a group. Inconsistent responses across almost all biological traits indicated that these traits may be less predictive of impacts across regions. Predictions of how biological traits, and associated ecosystem processes, respond to anthropogenic impacts may be most effective at regional scales where responses are more consistent.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":176,"journal":{"name":"Global Ecology and Biogeography","volume":"33 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/geb.13931","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Ecology and Biogeography","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/geb.13931","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aim
To determine which riverine invertebrate traits respond consistently to anthropogenic impacts across multiple biogeographic regions.
Location
Europe.
Time Period
1981–2021.
Major Taxa Studied
Riverine invertebrates.
Methods
We compiled a database of riverine invertebrate community time series for 673 sites across six European countries spanning six freshwater ecoregions. We compared trait responses to anthropogenic impacts (quantified as changes in ‘ecological quality’) among regions for seven ‘ecological’ traits, which reflect habitat preferences, and nine ‘biological’ traits (e.g., morphology or life history), which represent taxon-specific attributes that can influence ecosystem processes.
Results
Four ecological traits (current, microhabitat, salinity and trophic preferences) and one biological trait (dispersal mode) responded consistently across regions. These responses were primarily driven by spatial differences among poorer to better quality sites. Responses to temporal changes in quality were comparable but less pronounced.
Main Conclusions
Consistent responses to anthropogenic impacts across multiple ecological traits indicate these traits may improve broader scale measurements, comparisons and predictions of community responses. However, we could not use ecological traits to identify the actions of specific stressors because multiple traits always responded as a group. Inconsistent responses across almost all biological traits indicated that these traits may be less predictive of impacts across regions. Predictions of how biological traits, and associated ecosystem processes, respond to anthropogenic impacts may be most effective at regional scales where responses are more consistent.
期刊介绍:
Global Ecology and Biogeography (GEB) welcomes papers that investigate broad-scale (in space, time and/or taxonomy), general patterns in the organization of ecological systems and assemblages, and the processes that underlie them. In particular, GEB welcomes studies that use macroecological methods, comparative analyses, meta-analyses, reviews, spatial analyses and modelling to arrive at general, conceptual conclusions. Studies in GEB need not be global in spatial extent, but the conclusions and implications of the study must be relevant to ecologists and biogeographers globally, rather than being limited to local areas, or specific taxa. Similarly, GEB is not limited to spatial studies; we are equally interested in the general patterns of nature through time, among taxa (e.g., body sizes, dispersal abilities), through the course of evolution, etc. Further, GEB welcomes papers that investigate general impacts of human activities on ecological systems in accordance with the above criteria.