C. Hanagan, R. A. Bennett, A. Barbour, A. N. Hughes
{"title":"Afterslip and Creep in the Rate-Dependent Framework: Joint Inversion of Borehole Strain and GNSS Displacements for the Mw 7.1 Ridgecrest Earthquake","authors":"C. Hanagan, R. A. Bennett, A. Barbour, A. N. Hughes","doi":"10.1029/2024JB028908","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The elusive transition toward afterslip following an earthquake is challenging to capture with typical data resolution limits. A dense geodetic network recorded the Mw 7.1 Ridgecrest earthquake, including 16 Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) stations and 3 borehole strainmeters (BSM). The sub-nanostrain precision and sub-second sampling rate of BSMs bridges a gap between conventional seismologic and geodetic methods, exemplified by atypical postseismic shear strain reversals observed at nearfield (<2 km) station B921 that remain unexplained. We jointly invert GNSS displacements and BSM strains for coseismic and postseismic slip spanning hours to months over 7 independent periods. Cosiesmically, our model resolves the largest slip magnitudes of up to 6.6 m on the mainshock rupture plane, with similar patterns to other inferred slip distributions. The foreshock fault appears to slip coincidently with mainshock, revealing potential asperities activated during the preceding Mw 6.4 event. Postseismically, the best-fitting models adhere to mechanical rate-and-state expectations of logarithmically decaying slip adjacent to the coseismic rupture terminus, and where deep rheologic conditions favor creep. Most spatial variation occurs in the early postseismic timeframe (<1–2 weeks), with evidence for regional rheologic control and static stress dependence. Triggered creep on the neighboring Garlock Fault unexpectedly persists for >178 days—further highlighting the importance of fault networks in postseismic stress redistribution, critical to assessing future hazard.</p>","PeriodicalId":15864,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024JB028908","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The elusive transition toward afterslip following an earthquake is challenging to capture with typical data resolution limits. A dense geodetic network recorded the Mw 7.1 Ridgecrest earthquake, including 16 Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) stations and 3 borehole strainmeters (BSM). The sub-nanostrain precision and sub-second sampling rate of BSMs bridges a gap between conventional seismologic and geodetic methods, exemplified by atypical postseismic shear strain reversals observed at nearfield (<2 km) station B921 that remain unexplained. We jointly invert GNSS displacements and BSM strains for coseismic and postseismic slip spanning hours to months over 7 independent periods. Cosiesmically, our model resolves the largest slip magnitudes of up to 6.6 m on the mainshock rupture plane, with similar patterns to other inferred slip distributions. The foreshock fault appears to slip coincidently with mainshock, revealing potential asperities activated during the preceding Mw 6.4 event. Postseismically, the best-fitting models adhere to mechanical rate-and-state expectations of logarithmically decaying slip adjacent to the coseismic rupture terminus, and where deep rheologic conditions favor creep. Most spatial variation occurs in the early postseismic timeframe (<1–2 weeks), with evidence for regional rheologic control and static stress dependence. Triggered creep on the neighboring Garlock Fault unexpectedly persists for >178 days—further highlighting the importance of fault networks in postseismic stress redistribution, critical to assessing future hazard.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth serves as the premier publication for the breadth of solid Earth geophysics including (in alphabetical order): electromagnetic methods; exploration geophysics; geodesy and gravity; geodynamics, rheology, and plate kinematics; geomagnetism and paleomagnetism; hydrogeophysics; Instruments, techniques, and models; solid Earth interactions with the cryosphere, atmosphere, oceans, and climate; marine geology and geophysics; natural and anthropogenic hazards; near surface geophysics; petrology, geochemistry, and mineralogy; planet Earth physics and chemistry; rock mechanics and deformation; seismology; tectonophysics; and volcanology.
JGR: Solid Earth has long distinguished itself as the venue for publication of Research Articles backed solidly by data and as well as presenting theoretical and numerical developments with broad applications. Research Articles published in JGR: Solid Earth have had long-term impacts in their fields.
JGR: Solid Earth provides a venue for special issues and special themes based on conferences, workshops, and community initiatives. JGR: Solid Earth also publishes Commentaries on research and emerging trends in the field; these are commissioned by the editors, and suggestion are welcome.