Diagnosis and Treatment of Tethered Spinal Cord: A Systematic Review.

IF 6.2 2区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS
Patrick Hsieh,Eric Apaydin,Robert G Briggs,Dalal Al-Amodi,Andrea Aleman,Kellie Dubel,Ariana Sardano,Judy Saint-Val,Kim Sysawang,Diana Zhang,Sachi Yagyu,Aneesa Motala,Danica Tolentino,Susanne Hempel
{"title":"Diagnosis and Treatment of Tethered Spinal Cord: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Patrick Hsieh,Eric Apaydin,Robert G Briggs,Dalal Al-Amodi,Andrea Aleman,Kellie Dubel,Ariana Sardano,Judy Saint-Val,Kim Sysawang,Diana Zhang,Sachi Yagyu,Aneesa Motala,Danica Tolentino,Susanne Hempel","doi":"10.1542/peds.2024-068270","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"CONTEXT\r\nTethered cord syndrome is associated with motor and sensory deficits.\r\n\r\nOBJECTIVE\r\nOur objective was to summarize evidence regarding the diagnosis, prophylactic surgery, symptomatic treatment, and repeat surgery of tethered spinal cord in a systematic review (CRD42023461296).\r\n\r\nDATA SOURCES AND STUDY SELECTION\r\nWe searched 13 databases, reference-mined reviews, and contacted authors to identify diagnostic accuracy studies and treatment studies published until March 2024.\r\n\r\nDATA EXTRACTION\r\nOne reviewer abstracted data, and a content expert checked the data for accuracy. We assessed the risk of bias, strength of evidence (SoE), and applicability.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nThe evidence base includes 103 controlled studies, many with risk of bias and applicability concerns, and 355 case series providing additional clinical information. We found moderate SoE for MRI diagnosing tethered spinal cord, with medium to high diagnostic sensitivity and specificity. A small number of prophylactic surgery studies suggested motor function benefits and stability of neurologic status over time, but also complications such as surgical site infection (low SoE). A larger body of evidence documents treatments for symptomatic patients; studies revealed improvement in neurologic status after surgical detethering (low SoE), but also postoperative complications such as cerebrospinal fluid leakage (moderate SoE). A small body of evidence exists for retethering treatment (low or insufficient SoE for all outcomes).\r\n\r\nLIMITATIONS\r\nThere was insufficient evidence for key outcomes (eg, over- or undertreatment, clinical impact of diagnostic modalities, ambulation, quality of life).\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nThis comprehensive overview informs difficult clinical decisions that parents and their children with tethered spinal cords, as well as their health care providers, face.","PeriodicalId":20028,"journal":{"name":"Pediatrics","volume":"67 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2024-068270","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

CONTEXT Tethered cord syndrome is associated with motor and sensory deficits. OBJECTIVE Our objective was to summarize evidence regarding the diagnosis, prophylactic surgery, symptomatic treatment, and repeat surgery of tethered spinal cord in a systematic review (CRD42023461296). DATA SOURCES AND STUDY SELECTION We searched 13 databases, reference-mined reviews, and contacted authors to identify diagnostic accuracy studies and treatment studies published until March 2024. DATA EXTRACTION One reviewer abstracted data, and a content expert checked the data for accuracy. We assessed the risk of bias, strength of evidence (SoE), and applicability. RESULTS The evidence base includes 103 controlled studies, many with risk of bias and applicability concerns, and 355 case series providing additional clinical information. We found moderate SoE for MRI diagnosing tethered spinal cord, with medium to high diagnostic sensitivity and specificity. A small number of prophylactic surgery studies suggested motor function benefits and stability of neurologic status over time, but also complications such as surgical site infection (low SoE). A larger body of evidence documents treatments for symptomatic patients; studies revealed improvement in neurologic status after surgical detethering (low SoE), but also postoperative complications such as cerebrospinal fluid leakage (moderate SoE). A small body of evidence exists for retethering treatment (low or insufficient SoE for all outcomes). LIMITATIONS There was insufficient evidence for key outcomes (eg, over- or undertreatment, clinical impact of diagnostic modalities, ambulation, quality of life). CONCLUSIONS This comprehensive overview informs difficult clinical decisions that parents and their children with tethered spinal cords, as well as their health care providers, face.
脊髓拴系的诊断与治疗:系统回顾
目的我们的目标是通过一项系统性综述(CRD42023461296)总结有关脊髓系带综合征的诊断、预防性手术、对症治疗和重复手术的证据。数据来源与研究筛选我们检索了13个数据库、参考文献和综述,并联系了作者以确定诊断准确性研究和治疗研究,这些研究发表于2024年3月之前。我们对偏倚风险、证据强度(SoE)和适用性进行了评估。结果证据基础包括 103 项对照研究(其中许多存在偏倚风险和适用性问题)和 355 个提供额外临床信息的病例系列。我们发现 MRI 诊断脊髓系带的 SoE 中等,诊断灵敏度和特异性中等至高等。少量预防性手术研究表明,随着时间的推移,运动功能和神经状态的稳定性会有所改善,但也会出现手术部位感染等并发症(低SoE)。更多的证据记录了对无症状患者的治疗方法;研究显示,手术脱系后神经状态有所改善(低SoE),但也出现了脑脊液漏等术后并发症(中度SoE)。局限性:关键结果(如过度治疗或治疗不当、诊断方式的临床影响、行走能力、生活质量)方面的证据不足。结论:本综述为脊髓系带缠绕患者的父母及其子女以及医疗服务提供者所面临的临床决策难题提供了参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pediatrics
Pediatrics 医学-小儿科
CiteScore
12.80
自引率
5.00%
发文量
791
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: The Pediatrics® journal is the official flagship journal of the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP). It is widely cited in the field of pediatric medicine and is recognized as the leading journal in the field. The journal publishes original research and evidence-based articles, which provide authoritative information to help readers stay up-to-date with the latest developments in pediatric medicine. The content is peer-reviewed and undergoes rigorous evaluation to ensure its quality and reliability. Pediatrics also serves as a valuable resource for conducting new research studies and supporting education and training activities in the field of pediatrics. It aims to enhance the quality of pediatric outpatient and inpatient care by disseminating valuable knowledge and insights. As of 2023, Pediatrics has an impressive Journal Impact Factor (IF) Score of 8.0. The IF is a measure of a journal's influence and importance in the scientific community, with higher scores indicating a greater impact. This score reflects the significance and reach of the research published in Pediatrics, further establishing its prominence in the field of pediatric medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信