Patrick Hsieh,Eric Apaydin,Robert G Briggs,Dalal Al-Amodi,Andrea Aleman,Kellie Dubel,Ariana Sardano,Judy Saint-Val,Kim Sysawang,Diana Zhang,Sachi Yagyu,Aneesa Motala,Danica Tolentino,Susanne Hempel
{"title":"Diagnosis and Treatment of Tethered Spinal Cord: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Patrick Hsieh,Eric Apaydin,Robert G Briggs,Dalal Al-Amodi,Andrea Aleman,Kellie Dubel,Ariana Sardano,Judy Saint-Val,Kim Sysawang,Diana Zhang,Sachi Yagyu,Aneesa Motala,Danica Tolentino,Susanne Hempel","doi":"10.1542/peds.2024-068270","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"CONTEXT\r\nTethered cord syndrome is associated with motor and sensory deficits.\r\n\r\nOBJECTIVE\r\nOur objective was to summarize evidence regarding the diagnosis, prophylactic surgery, symptomatic treatment, and repeat surgery of tethered spinal cord in a systematic review (CRD42023461296).\r\n\r\nDATA SOURCES AND STUDY SELECTION\r\nWe searched 13 databases, reference-mined reviews, and contacted authors to identify diagnostic accuracy studies and treatment studies published until March 2024.\r\n\r\nDATA EXTRACTION\r\nOne reviewer abstracted data, and a content expert checked the data for accuracy. We assessed the risk of bias, strength of evidence (SoE), and applicability.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nThe evidence base includes 103 controlled studies, many with risk of bias and applicability concerns, and 355 case series providing additional clinical information. We found moderate SoE for MRI diagnosing tethered spinal cord, with medium to high diagnostic sensitivity and specificity. A small number of prophylactic surgery studies suggested motor function benefits and stability of neurologic status over time, but also complications such as surgical site infection (low SoE). A larger body of evidence documents treatments for symptomatic patients; studies revealed improvement in neurologic status after surgical detethering (low SoE), but also postoperative complications such as cerebrospinal fluid leakage (moderate SoE). A small body of evidence exists for retethering treatment (low or insufficient SoE for all outcomes).\r\n\r\nLIMITATIONS\r\nThere was insufficient evidence for key outcomes (eg, over- or undertreatment, clinical impact of diagnostic modalities, ambulation, quality of life).\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nThis comprehensive overview informs difficult clinical decisions that parents and their children with tethered spinal cords, as well as their health care providers, face.","PeriodicalId":20028,"journal":{"name":"Pediatrics","volume":"67 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2024-068270","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
CONTEXT
Tethered cord syndrome is associated with motor and sensory deficits.
OBJECTIVE
Our objective was to summarize evidence regarding the diagnosis, prophylactic surgery, symptomatic treatment, and repeat surgery of tethered spinal cord in a systematic review (CRD42023461296).
DATA SOURCES AND STUDY SELECTION
We searched 13 databases, reference-mined reviews, and contacted authors to identify diagnostic accuracy studies and treatment studies published until March 2024.
DATA EXTRACTION
One reviewer abstracted data, and a content expert checked the data for accuracy. We assessed the risk of bias, strength of evidence (SoE), and applicability.
RESULTS
The evidence base includes 103 controlled studies, many with risk of bias and applicability concerns, and 355 case series providing additional clinical information. We found moderate SoE for MRI diagnosing tethered spinal cord, with medium to high diagnostic sensitivity and specificity. A small number of prophylactic surgery studies suggested motor function benefits and stability of neurologic status over time, but also complications such as surgical site infection (low SoE). A larger body of evidence documents treatments for symptomatic patients; studies revealed improvement in neurologic status after surgical detethering (low SoE), but also postoperative complications such as cerebrospinal fluid leakage (moderate SoE). A small body of evidence exists for retethering treatment (low or insufficient SoE for all outcomes).
LIMITATIONS
There was insufficient evidence for key outcomes (eg, over- or undertreatment, clinical impact of diagnostic modalities, ambulation, quality of life).
CONCLUSIONS
This comprehensive overview informs difficult clinical decisions that parents and their children with tethered spinal cords, as well as their health care providers, face.
期刊介绍:
The Pediatrics® journal is the official flagship journal of the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP). It is widely cited in the field of pediatric medicine and is recognized as the leading journal in the field.
The journal publishes original research and evidence-based articles, which provide authoritative information to help readers stay up-to-date with the latest developments in pediatric medicine. The content is peer-reviewed and undergoes rigorous evaluation to ensure its quality and reliability.
Pediatrics also serves as a valuable resource for conducting new research studies and supporting education and training activities in the field of pediatrics. It aims to enhance the quality of pediatric outpatient and inpatient care by disseminating valuable knowledge and insights.
As of 2023, Pediatrics has an impressive Journal Impact Factor (IF) Score of 8.0. The IF is a measure of a journal's influence and importance in the scientific community, with higher scores indicating a greater impact. This score reflects the significance and reach of the research published in Pediatrics, further establishing its prominence in the field of pediatric medicine.