Randomised controlled trial comparing different intersession intervals of intermittent theta burst delivered to the dorsal medial prefrontal cortex.

0 PSYCHIATRY
Michelle S Goodman,Laura Schulze,Zafiris J Daskalakis,Gerasimos N Konstantinou,Farrokh Mansouri,Alisson P Trevizol,Daniel M Blumberger,Jonathan Downar
{"title":"Randomised controlled trial comparing different intersession intervals of intermittent theta burst delivered to the dorsal medial prefrontal cortex.","authors":"Michelle S Goodman,Laura Schulze,Zafiris J Daskalakis,Gerasimos N Konstantinou,Farrokh Mansouri,Alisson P Trevizol,Daniel M Blumberger,Jonathan Downar","doi":"10.1136/bmjment-2024-301290","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nIntermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) is a form of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) that can be administered in a fraction of the time of standard rTMS. Applying multiple daily iTBS sessions (ie, accelerated iTBS) may enable patients to achieve remission more rapidly. However, questions remain regarding the optimal time interval between treatment sessions.\r\n\r\nOBJECTIVE\r\nThe overall aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and tolerability of two accelerated bilateral iTBS protocols (ie, 30-min or 60-min intervals) and a once-daily bilateral iTBS protocol (ie, 0-min interval) while the number of pulses was held constant, in patients with treatment-resistant depression (TRD).\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\n182 patients with TRD were randomised to receive two sessions per day of bilateral iTBS of the dorsomedial prefrontal cortex (DMPFC) at 60-min, 30-min or 0-min intervals. Sham treatments were delivered using a shielded 'sham coil' which produced the auditory and tactile sensations of stimulation. The primary outcome measure was a change in depression scores on the 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD-17) after 20 days of treatment.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nHRSD-17 scores improved across all groups; however, these improvements did not significantly differ between the three groups after 20 days of treatment. Similarly, response and remission rates did not differ between the treatment groups.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nThese results suggest that contrary to our original hypothesis, implementing a 30-min or 60-min interval between two treatment sessions of DMPFC-iTBS does not lead to a more rapid improvement in symptoms, than once-daily iTBS administration.\r\n\r\nTRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER\r\nNCT02778035.","PeriodicalId":72434,"journal":{"name":"BMJ mental health","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ mental health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjment-2024-301290","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND Intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) is a form of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) that can be administered in a fraction of the time of standard rTMS. Applying multiple daily iTBS sessions (ie, accelerated iTBS) may enable patients to achieve remission more rapidly. However, questions remain regarding the optimal time interval between treatment sessions. OBJECTIVE The overall aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and tolerability of two accelerated bilateral iTBS protocols (ie, 30-min or 60-min intervals) and a once-daily bilateral iTBS protocol (ie, 0-min interval) while the number of pulses was held constant, in patients with treatment-resistant depression (TRD). METHODS 182 patients with TRD were randomised to receive two sessions per day of bilateral iTBS of the dorsomedial prefrontal cortex (DMPFC) at 60-min, 30-min or 0-min intervals. Sham treatments were delivered using a shielded 'sham coil' which produced the auditory and tactile sensations of stimulation. The primary outcome measure was a change in depression scores on the 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD-17) after 20 days of treatment. RESULTS HRSD-17 scores improved across all groups; however, these improvements did not significantly differ between the three groups after 20 days of treatment. Similarly, response and remission rates did not differ between the treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS These results suggest that contrary to our original hypothesis, implementing a 30-min or 60-min interval between two treatment sessions of DMPFC-iTBS does not lead to a more rapid improvement in symptoms, than once-daily iTBS administration. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT02778035.
随机对照试验:比较向背内侧前额叶皮层输送间歇性θ脉冲的不同时间间隔。
背景间歇性θ脉冲刺激(iTBS)是一种重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS),其实施时间仅为标准经颅磁刺激的一小部分。每天多次使用 iTBS(即加速 iTBS)可使患者更快地获得缓解。本研究的总体目标是比较两种加速双侧 iTBS 方案(即间隔 30 分钟或 60 分钟)和一种每日一次双侧 iTBS 方案(即间隔 0 分钟)的疗效和耐受性,同时保持脉冲数不变。方法182名TRD患者被随机分配到每天两次的背内侧前额叶皮层(DMPFC)双侧iTBS治疗中,每次治疗间隔为60分钟、30分钟或0分钟。假治疗使用屏蔽的 "假线圈 "进行,该线圈可产生听觉和触觉刺激。主要结果指标是治疗20天后17项汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HRSD-17)中抑郁评分的变化。结论这些结果表明,与我们最初的假设相反,在两个 DMPFC-iTBS 治疗疗程之间间隔 30 分钟或 60 分钟并不会比每天一次 iTBS 治疗更快地改善症状。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信