Identification and Validation of a Threshold for Early Posttransplant Bronchoalveolar Fluid Hyaluronan that Distinguishes Lung Recipients at Risk for CLAD.

Jamie L Todd,Jeremy M Weber,Francine L Kelly,Andrew Nagler,Patrick McArthur,Lerin Eason,Jeeyon G Rim,Courtney W Frankel,John A Belperio,Marie Budev,Tereza Martinu,Kunal Patel,John M Reynolds,Pali D Shah,Lianne G Singer,Laurie D Snyder,Wayne Tsuang,S Sam Weigt,Megan L Neely,Scott M Palmer
{"title":"Identification and Validation of a Threshold for Early Posttransplant Bronchoalveolar Fluid Hyaluronan that Distinguishes Lung Recipients at Risk for CLAD.","authors":"Jamie L Todd,Jeremy M Weber,Francine L Kelly,Andrew Nagler,Patrick McArthur,Lerin Eason,Jeeyon G Rim,Courtney W Frankel,John A Belperio,Marie Budev,Tereza Martinu,Kunal Patel,John M Reynolds,Pali D Shah,Lianne G Singer,Laurie D Snyder,Wayne Tsuang,S Sam Weigt,Megan L Neely,Scott M Palmer","doi":"10.1016/j.healun.2024.10.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nFew tools exist for early identification of patients at risk for chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD). We previously showed hyaluronan (HA), a matrix molecule that regulates lung inflammation and fibrosis, accumulates in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) and blood in CLAD. We aimed to determine if early posttransplant HA elevations inform CLAD risk.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nHA was quantified in 3080 BALF and 1323 blood samples collected over the first posttransplant year in 743 adult lung recipients at 5 centers. The relationship between BALF or blood HA and CLAD was assessed using Cox models with a time-dependent binary covariate for \"elevated\" HA. Potential thresholds for elevated HA were examined using a grid search between the 50th and 85th percentile. The optimal threshold was identified using fit statistics, and the association between the selected threshold and CLAD was internally validated through iterative resampling. A multivariable Cox model using the selected threshold was performed to evaluate the association of elevated HA with CLAD considering other factors that may influence CLAD risk.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nBALF HA levels >19.1ng/mL (65th percentile), had the largest hazard ratio for CLAD (HR 1.70, 95% CI 1.25-1.31; p<0.001), optimized fit statistics, and demonstrated robust reproducibility. In a multivariable model, the occurrence of BALF HA >19.1 ng/mL in the first posttransplant year conferred a 66% increase in the hazards for CLAD (adjusted HR 1.66, 95% CI 1.19-2.32; p=0.003). Blood HA was not significantly associated with CLAD.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nWe identified and validated a precise threshold for BALF HA in the first posttransplant year that distinguishes patients at increased CLAD risk.","PeriodicalId":22654,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation","volume":"96 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healun.2024.10.014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND Few tools exist for early identification of patients at risk for chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD). We previously showed hyaluronan (HA), a matrix molecule that regulates lung inflammation and fibrosis, accumulates in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) and blood in CLAD. We aimed to determine if early posttransplant HA elevations inform CLAD risk. METHODS HA was quantified in 3080 BALF and 1323 blood samples collected over the first posttransplant year in 743 adult lung recipients at 5 centers. The relationship between BALF or blood HA and CLAD was assessed using Cox models with a time-dependent binary covariate for "elevated" HA. Potential thresholds for elevated HA were examined using a grid search between the 50th and 85th percentile. The optimal threshold was identified using fit statistics, and the association between the selected threshold and CLAD was internally validated through iterative resampling. A multivariable Cox model using the selected threshold was performed to evaluate the association of elevated HA with CLAD considering other factors that may influence CLAD risk. RESULTS BALF HA levels >19.1ng/mL (65th percentile), had the largest hazard ratio for CLAD (HR 1.70, 95% CI 1.25-1.31; p<0.001), optimized fit statistics, and demonstrated robust reproducibility. In a multivariable model, the occurrence of BALF HA >19.1 ng/mL in the first posttransplant year conferred a 66% increase in the hazards for CLAD (adjusted HR 1.66, 95% CI 1.19-2.32; p=0.003). Blood HA was not significantly associated with CLAD. CONCLUSIONS We identified and validated a precise threshold for BALF HA in the first posttransplant year that distinguishes patients at increased CLAD risk.
确定并验证移植后早期支气管肺泡液透明质酸的阈值,以区分有 CLAD 风险的肺部受者。
背景很少有工具可用于早期识别有慢性肺移植功能障碍(CLAD)风险的患者。我们以前研究发现,透明质酸(HA)是一种调节肺部炎症和纤维化的基质分子,会在 CLAD 患者的支气管肺泡灌洗液(BALF)和血液中蓄积。我们的目的是确定移植后早期 HA 升高是否可为 CLAD 风险提供信息。方法对 5 个中心的 743 名成年肺部受者在移植后第一年内采集的 3080 份 BALF 和 1323 份血液样本中的 HA 进行量化。使用Cox模型评估了BALF或血液HA与CLAD之间的关系,HA "升高 "的二元协变量与时间相关。在第 50 个百分位数和第 85 个百分位数之间进行网格搜索,检查了 HA 升高的潜在阈值。使用拟合统计量确定了最佳阈值,并通过迭代重采样对所选阈值与 CLAD 之间的关联进行了内部验证。考虑到可能影响 CLAD 风险的其他因素,使用选定阈值的多变量 Cox 模型评估 HA 升高与 CLAD 的关联。1ng/mL(第 65 百分位数),CLAD 的危险比最大(HR 1.70,95% CI 1.25-1.31;p19.1 ng/mL 在移植后第一年,CLAD 的危险增加 66%(调整后 HR 1.66,95% CI 1.19-2.32;p=0.003)。结论我们确定并验证了移植后第一年BALF HA的精确阈值,该阈值可将CLAD风险增加的患者区分开来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信